Literature DB >> 33792283

In Vivo Evaluation of the Regenerative Capability of Glycylglycine Ethyl Ester-Substituted Polyphosphazene and Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Blends: A Rabbit Critical-Sized Bone Defect Model.

Kenneth S Ogueri1,2, Kennedy S Ogueri3, Aneesah McClinton2, Ho-Man Kan2, Chinedu C Ude2, Mohammed A Barajaa2,4, Harry R Allcock3, Cato T Laurencin1,2,5,6,4.   

Abstract

In an effort to understand the biological capability of polyphosphazene-based polymers, three-dimensional biomimetic bone scaffolds were fabricated using the blends of poly[(glycine ethylglycinato)75(phenylphenoxy)25]phosphazene (PNGEGPhPh) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and an in vivo evaluation was performed in a rabbit critical-sized bone defect model. The matrices constructed from PNGEGPhPh-PLGA blends were surgically implanted into 15 mm critical-sized radial defects of the rabbits as structural templates for bone tissue regeneration. PLGA, which is the most commonly used synthetic bone graft substitute, was used as a control in this study. Radiological and histological analyses demonstrated that PNGEGPhPh-PLGA blends exhibited favorable in vivo biocompatibility and osteoconductivity, as the newly designed matrices allowed new bone formation to occur without adverse immunoreactions. The X-ray images of the blends showed higher levels of radiodensity than that of the pristine PLGA, indicating higher rates of new bone formation and regeneration. Micro-computed tomography quantification revealed that new bone volume fractions were significantly higher for the PNGEGPhPh-PLGA blends than for the PLGA controls after 4 weeks. The new bone volume increased linearly with increasing time points, with the new tissues observed throughout the defect area for the blend and only at the implant site's extremes for the PLGA control. Histologically, the polyphosphazene system appeared to show tissue responses and bone ingrowths superior to PLGA. By the end of the study, the defects with PNGEGPhPh-PLGA scaffolds exhibited evidence of effective bone tissue ingrowth and minimal inflammatory responses. Thus, polyphosphazene-containing biomaterials have excellent translational potential for use in bone regenerative engineering applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biocompatible polymers; biodegradable polymers; critical-sized bone defect; poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); polyphosphazenes; regenerative biomaterials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33792283      PMCID: PMC8084594          DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng        ISSN: 2373-9878


  24 in total

Review 1.  Enabling Technologies for Personalized and Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Dean Ho; Stephen R Quake; Edward R B McCabe; Wee Joo Chng; Edward K Chow; Xianting Ding; Bruce D Gelb; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Jason Hassenstab; Chih-Ming Ho; William C Mobley; Garry P Nolan; Steven T Rosen; Patrick Tan; Yun Yen; Ali Zarrinpar
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 2.  Additive Manufacturing of Precision Biomaterials.

Authors:  Elia A Guzzi; Mark W Tibbitt
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Materializing Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Natalie Artzi
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Inorganic Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Anna M Brokesh; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 5.  Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Ganesh Narayanan; Varadraj N Vernekar; Emmanuel L Kuyinu; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  A Regenerative Polymer Blend Composed of Glycylglycine ethyl ester-substituted Polyphosphazene and Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid).

Authors:  Kenneth S Ogueri; Kennedy S Ogueri; Harry R Allcock; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  ACS Appl Polym Mater       Date:  2020-01-08

7.  Osteoconductive and osteoinductive biodegradable microspheres serving as injectable micro-scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Jianping Mao; Pengfei Wei; Zuoying Yuan; Wei Jing; Jingjing Cao; Guangping Li; Jianxun Guo; Honggang Wang; Dafu Chen; Qing Cai
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 8.  Polyphosphazene polymers: The next generation of biomaterials for regenerative engineering and therapeutic drug delivery.

Authors:  Kenneth S Ogueri; Kennedy S Ogueri; Harry R Allcock; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  J Vac Sci Technol B Nanotechnol Microelectron       Date:  2020-04-09

9.  Biodegradable Polyphosphazene-Based Blends for Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Kenneth S Ogueri; Jorge L Escobar Ivirico; Lakshmi S Nair; Harry R Allcock; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2017-01-30

10.  3D-Printing of Hierarchically Designed and Osteoconductive Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Nicolas Söhling; Jonas Neijhoft; Vinzenz Nienhaus; Valentin Acker; Jana Harbig; Fabian Menz; Joachim Ochs; René D Verboket; Ulrike Ritz; Andreas Blaeser; Edgar Dörsam; Johannes Frank; Ingo Marzi; Dirk Henrich
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.623

View more
  1 in total

1.  Biodegradable Polyphosphazenes for Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Feiyang Chen; O R Teniola; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  J Mater Res       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.909

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.