| Literature DB >> 32674402 |
Angela Martínez Arroyo1,2, Camila Corvalán Aguilar3, Ximena Palma Molina1, Ximena Ceballos Sanchez1, Regina Mara Fisberg2.
Abstract
Diet during adolescence can have lasting effects on nutritional status, health, and development. We hypothesized that dietary patterns with low-quality nutrition are associated with overweightness. We collected data for 882 Chilean adolescents from the Growth and Obesity Cohort Study (mean age: 12 years). Dietary intake was assessed through 24-h recalls and weight status data were obtained during clinical visits. Dietary patterns were obtained through exploratory factor analysis. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine cross-sectional associations between dietary patterns and overweight (BMI z-score ≥ 1SD). Four dietary patterns were identified: "Breakfast/Light dinner", "Natural foods", "Western", and "Snacking". "Breakfast/Light dinner", "Western", and "Snacking" patterns provided higher energy and excess nutrients (sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar). Moreover, adolescents with higher adherence to "Western" or " Snacking" patterns (third tertile) had higher odds of being classified as overweight (OR = 1.67; 95%CI: 1.103-2.522 and OR = 1.86; 95%CI: 1.235-2.792, respectively) than those with lower adherence (first tertile). "Natural foods" pattern was also associated with overweightness (OR = 1.83; 95%CI: 1.219-2.754). These dietary patterns were associated with overconsumption of nutrients of public health concern. Three of the four main dietary patterns were associated with overweightness. These results highlight the need of prioritizing adolescents on obesity prevention strategies.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent diet; dietary pattern; dietary quality; exploratory factor analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32674402 PMCID: PMC7400834 DOI: 10.3390/nu12072083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flowchart for participant selection in the study.
Anthropometric, sociodemographic, and maternal characteristics of 882 Chilean adolescents, GOCS Study 2014–2015.
| Characteristics |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 434 | 49.2 |
| Female | 448 | 50.8 |
| Tanner Stage ¥ | ||
| 1 | 54 | 6.1 |
| 2 | 222 | 25.2 |
| 3 | 144 | 16.3 |
| 4 | 257 | 29.1 |
| 5 | 182 | 20.6 |
| Missing | 23 | 2.6 |
| Weight status (BMI-for-age | ||
| Underweight | 43 | 4.9 |
| Normal Weight | 383 | 43.5 |
| Overweight | 275 | 31.2 |
| Obesity | 180 | 20.4 |
| Sleep (hours) | ||
| ≥9 h | 236 | 26.8 |
| <9 h | 532 | 60.3 |
| Missing | 114 | 12.9 |
| School administrative status | ||
| Private | 543 | 61.6 |
| Public | 330 | 37.4 |
| Missing | 9 | 1 |
| School feeding program | ||
| No | 603 | 68.4 |
| Yes | 279 | 31.6 |
| Maternal Obesity † | ||
| No | 520 | 59.0 |
| Yes | 338 | 38.3 |
| Missing | 24 | 2.7 |
| Maternal education (years) | ||
| <12 years | 578 | 65.5 |
| ≥12 years | 280 | 31.8 |
| Missing | 24 | 2.7 |
* BMI-for-age z score: underweight ≤ −1 SD, normal < −1 SD and < +1 SD, overweight ≥ +1 SD and < +2 SD, obesity ≥ +2 SD [24]; † Maternal obesity = BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. ¥ Tanner status: girls were evaluated according to their breast development and boys were evaluated according their genitalia development [25].
Dietary Patterns practiced by GOCS adolescents (n:882), Chile 2014–2015.
| Food and Beverage Groups | Breakfast/Light Dinner | Natural Foods | Western | Snacking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milk | −0.22 | 0.00 | −0.32 | −0.12 |
| Flavored milk | −0.24 | −0.20 | 0.06 | 0.28 * |
| Yogurt | −0.10 | 0.03 | 0.01 | −0.73 * |
| Cheeses | 0.06 | −0.06 | 0.16 | 0.11 |
| Meats | −0.16 | 0.50 * | 0.29 * | 0.07 |
| Cold cuts | 0.27 * | −0.15 | 0.27 * | 0.00 |
| Processed meats | 0.01 | −0.20 | 0.41 * | −0.07 |
| Junk Food | −0.18 | −0.23 | 0.11 | 0.09 |
| Flavored juices | −0.22 | 0.16 | −0.07 | 0.24 |
| Soft drink | −0.07 | 0.03 | 0.41 * | 0.14 |
| Tea and coffee | 0.73 * | 0.04 | −0.11 | 0.08 |
| Bread | 0.64 * | −0.04 | 0.18 | 0.11 |
| Ready to eat cereal | −0.09 | 0.03 | −0.02 | −0.77 * |
| Rice, pastas, potatoes | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.47 * | −0.05 |
| Vegetables | 0.09 | 0.81 * | −0.01 | 0.00 |
| Fresh fruit | 0.08 | 0.16 | −0.23 | 0.05 |
| Eggs | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.00 | −0.07 |
| Homemade dishes | 0.14 | −0.11 | −0.62 * | 0.01 |
| Soups | −0.10 | 0.18 | −0.19 | 0.13 |
| Cracker and salt snack | −0.14 | −0.11 | 0.16 | 0.03 |
| Confectionery and chocolate | −0.07 | 0.02 | −0.03 | 0.17 |
| Cookies | −0.23 | −0.07 | −0.11 | 0.29 * |
| Cakes | −0.09 | 0.03 | −0.19 | 0.25 * |
| Desserts and ice cream | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.01 | −0.03 |
| Sugar | 0.70 * | 0.10 | −0.12 | 0.08 |
| Chocolate powder | −0.19 | −0.03 | −0.27 * | 0.01 |
| Margarine and butter | 0.49 * | −0.08 | 0.05 | −0.09 |
| Oil, lemon, salt, vinegar (for salad) | 0.00 | 0.79 * | 0.03 | −0.07 |
| Mayonnaise and ketchup | −0.01 | 0.04 | 0.31 * | 0.06 |
| % of explained variance | 7.42 | 6.42 | 5.64 | 5.43 |
| % of accumulated explained variance | 7.42 | 13.84 | 19.48 | 24.90 |
| Eigenvalues | 2.16 | 1.88 | 1.63 | 1.55 |
* All Factor loadings |0.25| are shown in bold for readability purposes. Bartlet sphericity test = p < 0.0001, KMO: 0.52.
Adherence (%) according to sociodemographic, anthropometric, and maternal nutrition status of 882 Chilean adolescents, GOCS Study 2014–2015 Chile.
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Sex | Male | 30.2 | 131 | 34.1 | 148 | 35.7 | 155 | 0.126 | 35.5 | 154 | 33.4 | 145 | 31.1 | 135 | 0.292 |
| Female | 36.4 | 163 | 32.6 | 146 | 31.0 | 139 | 31.3 | 140 | 33.3 | 149 | 35.5 | 159 | |||
| Tanner stage ¥ | 1–3 | 31.4 | 132 | 33.6 | 141 | 35.0 | 147 | 0.617 | 36.0 | 151 | 32.9 | 138 | 31.2 | 131 | 0.243 |
| 4–5 | 34.4 | 151 | 33.0 | 145 | 32.6 | 143 | 30.8 | 135 | 34.2 | 150 | 35.1 | 154 | |||
| Weight status ‡ | Underweight | 30.2 | 13 | 23.3 | 10 | 46.5 | 20 | 0.013 * | 32.6 | 14 | 32.6 | 14 | 34.9 | 15 | 0.167 |
| Normal Weight | 36.2 | 139 | 30.0 | 115 | 33.9 | 130 | 37.0 | 142 | 34.6 | 133 | 28.4 | 109 | |||
| Overweight | 33.1 | 91 | 40.0 | 110 | 26.9 | 74 | 31.3 | 86 | 33.1 | 91 | 35.6 | 98 | |||
| Obesity | 28.3 | 51 | 32.8 | 59 | 38.9 | 70 | 28.9 | 52 | 31.1 | 56 | 40.0 | 72 | |||
| Sleep Hours | ≥9 h | 33.5 | 79 | 34.8 | 82 | 31.8 | 75 | 0.727 | 32.2 | 76 | 37.3 | 88 | 30.5 | 72 | 0.324 |
| <9 h | 35.7 | 190 | 32.0 | 170 | 32.3 | 172 | 34.6 | 184 | 31.8 | 169 | 33.7 | 179 | |||
| School administrative status | Public | 30.6 | 101 | 32.4 | 107 | 37.0 | 122 | 0.186 | 34.9 | 115 | 32.7 | 108 | 32.4 | 107 | 0.728 |
| Private | 34.8 | 189 | 34.1 | 185 | 31.1 | 169 | 32.2 | 175 | 34.1 | 185 | 33.7 | 183 | |||
| School feeding program £ | Yes | 32.6 | 91 | 33.3 | 93 | 34.1 | 95 | 0.939 | 37.3 | 104 | 35.1 | 98 | 27.6 | 77 | 0.042 * |
| No | 33.7 | 203 | 33.3 | 201 | 33.0 | 199 | 31.5 | 190 | 32.5 | 196 | 36.0 | 217 | |||
| Maternal Obesity | Yes | 36.5 | 100 | 32.7 | 113 | 30.8 | 125 | 0.069 | 33.3 | 113 | 33.1 | 114 | 33.7 | 111 | 0.966 |
| No | 29.6 | 190 | 33.4 | 170 | 37.0 | 160 | 33.4 | 173 | 33.7 | 172 | 32.8 | 175 | |||
| Maternal education years | ≥12 years | 35.3 | 204 | 32.7 | 189 | 32.0 | 185 | 0.304 | 31.8 | 184 | 32.9 | 190 | 35.3 | 204 | 0.076 |
| <12 years | 30.0 | 84 | 35.7 | 100 | 34.3 | 96 | 38.2 | 107 | 33.6 | 94 | 28.2 | 79 | |||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Sex | Male | 29.3 | 127 | 35.7 | 155 | 35.0 | 152 | 0.040 * | 33.9 | 147 | 31.8 | 138 | 34.3 | 149 | 0.627 |
| Female | 37.3 | 167 | 31.0 | 139 | 31.7 | 142 | 32.8 | 147 | 34.8 | 156 | 32.4 | 145 | |||
| Tanner status ¥ | 1–3 | 32.4 | 136 | 36.0 | 151 | 31.7 | 133 | 0.324 | 33.3 | 140 | 32.9 | 138 | 33.8 | 142 | 0.900 |
| 4–5 | 33.9 | 149 | 31.2 | 137 | 34.9 | 153 | 33.9 | 149 | 33.7 | 148 | 32.4 | 142 | |||
| Weight status ‡ | Underweight | 27.9 | 12 | 41.9 | 18 | 30.2 | 13 | 0.675 | 34.9 | 15 | 27.9 | 12 | 37.2 | 16 | 0.408 |
| Normal Weight | 35.4 | 136 | 30.5 | 117 | 34.1 | 131 | 35.9 | 138 | 30.5 | 117 | 33.6 | 129 | |||
| Overweight | 31.6 | 87 | 34.2 | 94 | 34.2 | 94 | 33.1 | 91 | 34.2 | 94 | 32.7 | 90 | |||
| Obesity | 32.8 | 59 | 36.1 | 65 | 31.1 | 56 | 27.8 | 50 | 39.4 | 71 | 32.8 | 59 | |||
| Sleep Hours | ≥9 h | 33.9 | 80 | 32.2 | 76 | 33.9 | 80 | 0.663 | 33.5 | 79 | 31.4 | 74 | 35.2 | 83 | 0.611 |
| <9 h | 32.7 | 174 | 35.5 | 189 | 31.8 | 169 | 34.8 | 185 | 33.7 | 179 | 31.6 | 168 | |||
| School administrative status | Public | 34.6 | 114 | 31.5 | 104 | 33.9 | 112 | 0.670 | 31.5 | 104 | 37.9 | 125 | 30.6 | 101 | 0.082 |
| Private | 32.8 | 178 | 34.4 | 187 | 32.8 | 178 | 34.4 | 187 | 30.6 | 166 | 35.0 | 190 | |||
| School feeding program £ | Yes | 36.9 | 103 | 35.5 | 99 | 27.6 | 77 | 0.046 * | 27.6 | 77 | 32.3 | 90 | 40.1 | 112 | 0.007 * |
| No | 31.7 | 191 | 32.3 | 195 | 36.0 | 217 | 36.0 | 217 | 33.8 | 204 | 30.2 | 182 | |||
| Maternal obesity | No | 35.2 | 183 | 33.7 | 175 | 31.2 | 162 | 0.197 | 33.1 | 172 | 34.2 | 178 | 32.7 | 170 | 0.719 |
| Yes | 30.2 | 102 | 33.4 | 113 | 36.4 | 123 | 33.7 | 114 | 31.7 | 107 | 34.6 | 117 | |||
| Maternal education years | ≥12 years | 33.0 | 191 | 35.3 | 204 | 31.7 | 183 | 0.265 | 35.1 | 203 | 32.5 | 188 | 32.4 | 187 | 0.561 |
| <12 years | 33.2 | 93 | 30.4 | 85 | 36.4 | 102 | 31.4 | 88 | 34.6 | 97 | 33.9 | 95 | |||
T: Tertile adherence. All values are shown as percentages (for categorical). ¥ Tanner status: girls were evaluated according to their breast development and boys were evaluated according their genitalia development [25]. ‡ Nutritional status, BMI-for-age z score: underweight ≤ −1 SD, normal < −1 SD and < +1 SD, overweight ≥ +1 SD and < +2 SD, obesity ≥ +2 SD [24]. £ School feeding program: adolescents receive some food services of feeding program (yes or no). * X2 Pearson tests, p value < 0.05.
Medians nutrient intake according to tertile † of adherence to dietary patterns in GOCS adolescents (n:882).
| Dietary Patterns | Saturated Fat (%) IE § | Added Sugars (%) IE § | Sodium mg/1000 kcal | Energy/day (kcal) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medians | IQR † |
| Medians | IQR † |
| Medians | IQR † |
| Medians | IQR † |
| ||
| Breakfast/Light dinner | tertile 1 | 9.8 | 1.8 | 0.001 abc | 18.3 | 6.6 | 0.285 | 1468 | 286 | 0.001 ab | 1754 | 504 | 0.017 c |
| tertile 2 | 9.6 | 2.1 | 17.4 | 6.8 | 1535 | 261 | 1758 | 464 | |||||
| tertile 3 | 9.0 | 2.4 | 17.3 | 6.4 | 1515 | 254 | 1819 | 427 | |||||
| Natural foods | tertile 1 | 9.7 | 2.2 | 0.001 bc | 17.5 | 6.5 | 0.949 | 1478 | 257 | 0.017 ab | 1809 | 478 | 0.194 c |
| tertile 2 | 9.6 | 2.2 | 17.9 | 6.3 | 1521 | 286 | 1763 | 442 | |||||
| tertile 3 | 9.1 | 2.1 | 17.4 | 7.3 | 1530 | 277 | 1781 | 464 | |||||
| Western | tertile 1 | 9.5 | 2.0 | 0.077 bc | 17.5 | 6.8 | 0.404 | 1488 | 304 | 0.424 b | 1738 | 441 | 0.001 bc |
| tertile 2 | 9.4 | 2.2 | 18.2 | 7.3 | 1514 | 272 | 1733 | 429 | |||||
| tertile 3 | 9.7 | 2.5 | 17.2 | 6.2 | 1526 | 247 | 1913 | 417 | |||||
| Snacking | tertile 1 | 9.6 | 2.1 | 0.215 a | 16.5 | 6.5 | 0.001 bc | 1528 | 263 | 0.001 bc | 1704 | 470 | 0.001 bc |
| tertile 2 | 9.5 | 2.3 | 16.8 | 6.5 | 1553 | 288 | 1887 | 446 | |||||
| tertile 3 | 9.5 | 2.6 | 19.3 | 6.2 | 1460 | 258 | 1754 | 504 | |||||
Tertile 1 lower adherence, tertile 3 higher adherence. § IE, energy intake day. † Interquartile range (IQR). a Significant difference between tertile 1 and 2 of the factor scores. b Significant difference between tertile 1 and 3 of the factor scores. c Significant difference between tertile 2 and 3 of the factor scores. ‡ Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s test post hoc, p value < 0.05.
Crude odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio of overweight, according to tertile of dietary pattern practiced by GOCS adolescents. Chile, 2014–2015.
| Dietary Patterns | Crude Model | Adjusted Model 1 § | Adjusted Model 2 | | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORs † | 95% CI * | ORs † | 95% CI * | ORs † | 95% CI * | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| tertile 1 ¶ | Ref ‡ | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| tertile 2 | 1.45 | 1.045 | 2.003 * | 1.28 | 0.903 | 1.815 | 1.25 | 0.839 | 1.875 |
| tertile 3 | 1.03 | 0.744 | 1.420 | 0.90 | 0.634 | 1.274 | 1.03 | 0.689 | 1.529 |
|
| |||||||||
| tertile 1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| tertile 2 | 1.13 | 0.818 | 1.562 | 1.15 | 0.810 | 1.620 | 1.07 | 0.717 | 1.583 |
| tertile 3 | 1.55 | 1.119 | 2.146 * | 1.68 | 1.180 | 2.390 * | 1.83 | 1.219 | 2.754 * |
|
| |||||||||
| tertile 1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| tertile 2 | 1.19 | 0.864 | 1.651 | 1.14 | 0.802 | 1.608 | 1.07 | 0.720 | 1.603 |
| tertile 3 | 1.06 | 0.764 | 1.459 | 1.00 | 0.701 | 1.418 | 1.67 | 1.103 | 2.522 * |
|
| |||||||||
| tertile 1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| tertile 2 | 1.39 | 1.003 | 1.920 * | 1.53 | 1.077 | 2.160 * | 1.51 | 1.013 | 2.235 * |
| tertile 3 | 1.12 | 0.807 | 1.541 | 1.19 | 0.839 | 1.680 | 1.86 | 1.235 | 2.792 * |
* 95% Confidence Intervals, value p < 0.05. † ORs: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval. ‡ Ref: reference. § Logistic model 1: adjusted for sex, age, tanner, maternal obesity, maternal education (n:816). | Logistic model 2: adjusted for sex, age, tanner, maternal obesity, maternal education and misreporting (n:816). ¶ Tertile 1 lower adherence, tertile 3 higher adherence.