Literature DB >> 18845021

Associations between the portion sizes of food groups consumed and measures of adiposity in the British National Diet and Nutrition Survey.

Mary T Kelly1, Kirsten L Rennie, Julie M W Wallace, Paula J Robson, Robert W Welch, Mary P Hannon-Fletcher, M Barbara E Livingstone.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to examine the associations between the portion sizes of food groups consumed with measures of adiposity using data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of British adults. Seven-day weighed dietary records, physical activity diaries and anthropometric measurements were used. Foods eaten were assigned to thirty different food groups and analyses were undertaken separately for men and women. The median daily portion size of each food group consumed was calculated. The potential mis-reporting [corrected] of dietary energy intake (EI) was identified using the following equation: EI--estimated energy requirements/EER [corrected] x 100 = percentage of under-reporting (UR) of energy needs. Multinomial logistic regression (adjusted for age, social class, physical activity level and UR) was used to determine the portion sizes of food groups most strongly associated with obesity status. Few positive associations between the portion sizes of food groups consumed and obesity status were found. However, UR was prevalent, with a median UR of predicted energy needs of 34 and 33 % in men and women, respectively. After the adjustment was made for UR, more associations between the food groups and obesity status became apparent in both sexes. The present study suggests that the true effect of increased portion size of foods on obesity status may be masked by high levels of UR. Alternatively, these data may indicate that an increased risk of obesity is not associated with specific foods/food groups but rather with an overall increase in the range of foods and food groups being consumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18845021     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508060777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  20 in total

1.  Use of accelerometer data in prediction equations for capturing implausible dietary intakes in adolescents.

Authors:  Sabrina E Noel; Calum Mattocks; Pauline Emmett; Chris J Riddoch; Andrew R Ness; P K Newby
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  The Influence of Portion Size and Timing of Meals on Weight Balance and Obesity.

Authors:  Christina Berg; Heléne Bertéus Forslund
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-03

3.  Reliability and responsiveness of virtual portion size creation tasks: Influences of context, foods, and a bariatric surgical procedure.

Authors:  Jeon D Hamm; Jany Dotel; Shoran Tamura; Ari Shechter; Musya Herzog; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Jeanine Albu; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Blandine Laferrère; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-06-06

4.  Perceived 'healthiness' of foods can influence consumers' estimations of energy density and appropriate portion size.

Authors:  G P Faulkner; L K Pourshahidi; J M W Wallace; M A Kerr; T A McCaffrey; M B E Livingstone
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Obesity-Induced Structural and Neuronal Plasticity in the Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Jennifer L Thompson; Michael Drysdale; Corey Baimel; Manpreet Kaur; Taigan MacGowan; Kimberley A Pitman; Stephanie L Borgland
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Dietary energy density and obesity: how consumption patterns differ by body weight status.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Vernarelli; Diane C Mitchell; Barbara J Rolls; Terryl J Hartman
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 5.614

7.  Portion Sizes from 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Differed by Sex among Those Who Selected the Same Portion Size Category on a Food Frequency Questionnaire.

Authors:  Minji Kang; Song-Yi Park; Carol J Boushey; Lynne R Wilkens; Kristine R Monroe; Loïc Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Suzanne P Murphy; Hee-Young Paik
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  Application of the ≤ 10:1 carbohydrate to fiber ratio to identify healthy grain foods and its association with cardiometabolic risk factors.

Authors:  Mariane de Mello Fontanelli; Renata Micha; Cristiane Hermes Sales; Junxiu Liu; Dariush Mozaffarian; Regina Mara Fisberg
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 5.614

9.  Personal and social norms for food portion sizes in lean and obese adults.

Authors:  H B Lewis; S E Forwood; A L Ahern; K Verlaers; E Robinson; S Higgs; S A Jebb
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Estimating food portions. Influence of unit number, meal type and energy density.

Authors:  Eva Almiron-Roig; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Jessica Dodd; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.