Literature DB >> 32671538

Evaluation of artifacts of cochlear implant electrodes in cone beam computed tomography.

Nicholas Bevis1, Thomas Effertz2, Dirk Beutner2, Christian Gueldner3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) offers a valid alternative to conventional Computed Tomography (CT). A possible radiation dose reduction with the use of CBCT in postoperative imaging of CIs is of great importance. Whether the visualization of Cochlear Implant (CI) electrodes in CBCT correlates with the radiation dose applied was investigated in this study.
METHODS: We compared the visualization quality of Contour Advance CIs to Straight CIs from Cochlear using CBCT with varying tube parameters on whole-head specimen.
RESULTS: The internal diameter of the cochlea decreases from base to apex, resulting in a significantly different intracochlear positioning of the two tested CI models. While electrodes of the Contour Advance series are located close to the modiolus, thus closer to the spiral ganglion neurons, those of the Straight series are located further away. The artifact portion of the electrode amounts to 50-70% of the radiological diameter of the electrode. An increase in artifact portion from the base (electrode #1 approx. 50%) to the apex (electrode #20 approx. 70%) of the cochlea was observed. The visualization of electrodes in the medial and apical part of the cochlea is limited due to artifact overlapping. There was no correlation between the artifact size and the applied radiation dose.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that a reduction of the radiation dose by up to 45% of the currently applied radiation dose of standard protocols would be possible. Investigations of the effects on subjective image quality still need to be performed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; CT; Cochlear implant; Dose reduction; Electrode artifact; Radiation dose

Year:  2020        PMID: 32671538     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06198-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  18 in total

1.  Width of the normal facial canal measured by high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Masahiro Komori; Kazuomi Yamada; Yasuyuki Hinohira; Hiroshi Aritomo; Naoaki Yanagihara
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 2.  Effective dose of cone beam CT (CBCT) of the facial skeleton: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Al-Okshi; C Lindh; H Salé; M Gunnarsson; M Rohlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Flat Panel Angiography in the Cross-Sectional Imaging of the Temporal Bone: Assessment of Image Quality and Radiation Dose Compared with a 64-Section Multisection CT Scanner.

Authors:  G Conte; E Scola; S Calloni; R Brambilla; M Campoleoni; L Lombardi; F Di Berardino; D Zanetti; L M Gaini; F Triulzi; C Sina
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Flat-panel CT versus 128-slice CT in temporal bone imaging: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Lorenzo Piergallini; Elisa Scola; Bruno Tuscano; Roberto Brambilla; Mauro Campoleoni; Gabriella Raimondi; Luciano Lombardi; Federica Di Berardino; Diego Zanetti; Clara Sina; Fabio Triulzi; Giorgio Conte
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Stapedius reflex to electrical stimulation in a patient with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  J Jerger; H Jenkins; R Fifer; D Mecklenburg
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Co-registration of cone beam CT and preoperative MRI for improved accuracy of electrode localization following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  A S Dragovic; A K Stringer; L Campbell; C Shaul; S J O'Leary; R J Briggs
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2018-01-18

7.  Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; René H Gifford; Geoffrey J Service; Nicole M Tombers; Becky J Hughes-Borst; Brian A Neff; Charles W Beatty
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Use of intraoperative CT scanning for quality control assessment of cochlear implant electrode array placement.

Authors:  Robert F Labadie; Antonio D Schefano; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; Alejandro Rivas; Matthew R O'Malley; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea.

Authors:  Ersin Avci; Tim Nauwelaers; Thomas Lenarz; Volkmar Hamacher; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 10.  Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials.

Authors:  Megan J Foggia; Rene Vielman Quevedo; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Postoperative radiological assessment of the mastoid facial canal in cochlear implant patients in correlation with facial nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Iris Burck; Rania A Helal; Nagy N N Naguib; Nour-Eldin A Nour-Eldin; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Simon Martin; Martin Leinung; Silke Helbig; Timo Stöver; Annette Lehn; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.