Literature DB >> 32661176

Spatial proximity moderates genotype uncertainty in genetic tagging studies.

Ben C Augustine1,2, J Andrew Royle3, Daniel W Linden4, Angela K Fuller5.   

Abstract

Accelerating declines of an increasing number of animal populations worldwide necessitate methods to reliably and efficiently estimate demographic parameters such as population density and trajectory. Standard methods for estimating demographic parameters from noninvasive genetic samples are inefficient because lower-quality samples cannot be used, and they assume individuals are identified without error. We introduce the genotype spatial partial identity model (gSPIM), which integrates a genetic classification model with a spatial population model to combine both spatial and genetic information, thus reducing genotype uncertainty and increasing the precision of demographic parameter estimates. We apply this model to data from a study of fishers (Pekania pennanti) in which 37% of hair samples were originally discarded because of uncertainty in individual identity. The gSPIM density estimate using all collected samples was 25% more precise than the original density estimate, and the model identified and corrected three errors in the original individual identity assignments. A simulation study demonstrated that our model increased the accuracy and precision of density estimates 63 and 42%, respectively, using three replicated assignments (e.g., PCRs for microsatellites) per genetic sample. Further, the simulations showed that the gSPIM model parameters are identifiable with only one replicated assignment per sample and that accuracy and precision are relatively insensitive to the number of replicated assignments for high-quality samples. Current genotyping protocols devote the majority of resources to replicating and confirming high-quality samples, but when using the gSPIM, genotyping protocols could be more efficient by devoting more resources to low-quality samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification; genetic capture–recapture; microsatellite; partial identity; spatial capture–recapture

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32661176      PMCID: PMC7395497          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2000247117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

1.  Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Craig R Miller; Paul Joyce; Lisette P Waits
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Population size estimation in Yellowstone wolves with error-prone noninvasive microsatellite genotypes.

Authors:  Scott Creel; Goran Spong; Jennifer L Sands; Jay Rotella; Janet Zeigle; Lawrence Joe; Kerry M Murphy; Douglas Smith
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Uncovering a latent multinomial: analysis of mark-recapture data with misidentification.

Authors:  William A Link; Jun Yoshizaki; Larissa L Bailey; Kenneth H Pollock
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Incorporating genotype uncertainty into mark-recapture-type models for estimating abundance using DNA samples.

Authors:  Janine A Wright; Richard J Barker; Matthew R Schofield; Alain C Frantz; Andrea E Byrom; Dianne M Gleeson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR.

Authors:  P Taberlet; S Griffin; B Goossens; S Questiau; V Manceau; N Escaravage; L P Waits; J Bouvet
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Genetic tagging in the Anthropocene: scaling ecology from alleles to ecosystems.

Authors:  Clayton T Lamb; Adam T Ford; Michael F Proctor; J Andrew Royle; Garth Mowat; Stan Boutin
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Spatial proximity moderates genotype uncertainty in genetic tagging studies.

Authors:  Ben C Augustine; J Andrew Royle; Daniel W Linden; Angela K Fuller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Spatially explicit inference for open populations: estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies.

Authors:  Beth Gardner; Juan Reppucci; Mauro Lucherini; J Andrew Royle
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Range contractions of the world's large carnivores.

Authors:  Christopher Wolf; William J Ripple
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  PROTAX-Sound: A probabilistic framework for automated animal sound identification.

Authors:  Ulisses Moliterno de Camargo; Panu Somervuo; Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spatial proximity moderates genotype uncertainty in genetic tagging studies.

Authors:  Ben C Augustine; J Andrew Royle; Daniel W Linden; Angela K Fuller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Occupancy data improves parameter precision in spatial capture-recapture models.

Authors:  José Jiménez; Francisco Díaz-Ruiz; Pedro Monterroso; Jorge Tobajas; Pablo Ferreras
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.167

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.