Literature DB >> 19173702

Incorporating genotype uncertainty into mark-recapture-type models for estimating abundance using DNA samples.

Janine A Wright1, Richard J Barker, Matthew R Schofield, Alain C Frantz, Andrea E Byrom, Dianne M Gleeson.   

Abstract

Sampling DNA noninvasively has advantages for identifying animals for uses such as mark-recapture modeling that require unique identification of animals in samples. Although it is possible to generate large amounts of data from noninvasive sources of DNA, a challenge is overcoming genotyping errors that can lead to incorrect identification of individuals. A major source of error is allelic dropout, which is failure of DNA amplification at one or more loci. This has the effect of heterozygous individuals being scored as homozygotes at those loci as only one allele is detected. If errors go undetected and the genotypes are naively used in mark-recapture models, significant overestimates of population size can occur. To avoid this it is common to reject low-quality samples but this may lead to the elimination of large amounts of data. It is preferable to retain these low-quality samples as they still contain usable information in the form of partial genotypes. Rather than trying to minimize error or discarding error-prone samples we model dropout in our analysis. We describe a method based on data augmentation that allows us to model data from samples that include uncertain genotypes. Application is illustrated using data from the European badger (Meles meles).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173702     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01165.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Spatial proximity moderates genotype uncertainty in genetic tagging studies.

Authors:  Ben C Augustine; J Andrew Royle; Daniel W Linden; Angela K Fuller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of Photo and Genotype-Based Misidentification Error on Estimates of Survival, Detection and State Transition using Multistate Survival Models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Winiarski; Kevin McGarigal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of photo-matching algorithms commonly used for photographic capture-recapture studies.

Authors:  Maximilian Matthé; Marco Sannolo; Kristopher Winiarski; Annemarieke Spitzen-van der Sluijs; Daniel Goedbloed; Sebastian Steinfartz; Ulrich Stachow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  A maximum-likelihood method to correct for allelic dropout in microsatellite data with no replicate genotypes.

Authors:  Chaolong Wang; Kari B Schroeder; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Determining Occurrence Dynamics when False Positives Occur: Estimating the Range Dynamics of Wolves from Public Survey Data.

Authors:  David A W Miller; James D Nichols; Justin A Gude; Lindsey N Rich; Kevin M Podruzny; James E Hines; Michael S Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.

Authors:  Brett T McClintock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Multiple Systems Estimation (or Capture-Recapture Estimation) to Inform Public Policy.

Authors:  Sheila M Bird; Ruth King
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.