Literature DB >> 19397581

Uncovering a latent multinomial: analysis of mark-recapture data with misidentification.

William A Link1, Jun Yoshizaki, Larissa L Bailey, Kenneth H Pollock.   

Abstract

Natural tags based on DNA fingerprints or natural features of animals are now becoming very widely used in wildlife population biology. However, classic capture-recapture models do not allow for misidentification of animals which is a potentially very serious problem with natural tags. Statistical analysis of misidentification processes is extremely difficult using traditional likelihood methods but is easily handled using Bayesian methods. We present a general framework for Bayesian analysis of categorical data arising from a latent multinomial distribution. Although our work is motivated by a specific model for misidentification in closed population capture-recapture analyses, with crucial assumptions which may not always be appropriate, the methods we develop extend naturally to a variety of other models with similar structure. Suppose that observed frequencies f are a known linear transformation f=A'x of a latent multinomial variable x with cell probability vector pi=pi(theta). Given that full conditional distributions [theta | x] can be sampled, implementation of Gibbs sampling requires only that we can sample from the full conditional distribution [x | f, theta], which is made possible by knowledge of the null space of A'. We illustrate the approach using two data sets with individual misidentification, one simulated, the other summarizing recapture data for salamanders based on natural marks.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19397581     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01244.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  Spatial proximity moderates genotype uncertainty in genetic tagging studies.

Authors:  Ben C Augustine; J Andrew Royle; Daniel W Linden; Angela K Fuller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations.

Authors:  D L Borchers; B C Stevenson; D Kidney; L Thomas; T A Marques
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 3.  iDNA from terrestrial haematophagous leeches as a wildlife surveying and monitoring tool - prospects, pitfalls and avenues to be developed.

Authors:  Ida Bærholm Schnell; Rahel Sollmann; Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer; Mark E Siddall; Douglas W Yu; Andreas Wilting; M Thomas P Gilbert
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Effects of Photo and Genotype-Based Misidentification Error on Estimates of Survival, Detection and State Transition using Multistate Survival Models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Winiarski; Kevin McGarigal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of photo-matching algorithms commonly used for photographic capture-recapture studies.

Authors:  Maximilian Matthé; Marco Sannolo; Kristopher Winiarski; Annemarieke Spitzen-van der Sluijs; Daniel Goedbloed; Sebastian Steinfartz; Ulrich Stachow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The challenges of recognising individuals with few distinguishing features: Identifying red foxes Vulpes vulpes from camera-trap photos.

Authors:  Jo Dorning; Stephen Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A paradox of local abundance amidst regional rarity: the value of montane refugia for Persian leopard conservation.

Authors:  Mohammad S Farhadinia; Brett T McClintock; Paul J Johnson; Pouyan Behnoud; Kaveh Hobeali; Peyman Moghadas; Luke T B Hunter; David W Macdonald
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Computer-assisted photo identification outperforms visible implant elastomers in an endangered salamander, Eurycea tonkawae.

Authors:  Nathan F Bendik; Thomas A Morrison; Andrew G Gluesenkamp; Mark S Sanders; Lisa J O'Donnell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.

Authors:  Brett T McClintock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.