OBJECTIVE: PDAC patients who undergo surgical resection and receive effective chemotherapy have the best chance of long-term survival. Unfortunately, we lack predictive biomarkers to guide optimal systemic treatment. Ex-vivo generation of PDO for pharmacotyping may serve as predictive biomarkers in PDAC. The goal of the current study was to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of a PDO-guided precision medicine framework of care. METHODS: PDO cultures were established from surgical specimens and endoscopic biopsies, expanded in Matrigel, and used for high-throughput drug testing (pharmacotyping). Efficacy of standard-of-care chemotherapeutics was assessed by measuring cell viability after drug exposure. RESULTS: A framework for rapid pharmacotyping of PDOs was established across a multi-institutional consortium of academic medical centers. Specimens obtained remotely and shipped to a central biorepository maintain viability and allowed generation of PDOs with 77% success. Early cultures maintain the clonal heterogeneity seen in PDAC with similar phenotypes (cystic-solid). Late cultures exhibit a dominant clone with a pharmacotyping profile similar to early passages. The biomass required for accurate pharmacotyping can be minimized by leveraging a high-throughput technology. Twenty-nine cultures were pharmacotyped to derive a population distribution of chemotherapeutic sensitivity at our center. Pharmacotyping rapidly-expanded PDOs was completed in a median of 48 (range 18-102) days. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid development of PDOs from patients undergoing surgery for PDAC is eminently feasible within the perioperative recovery period, enabling the potential for pharmacotyping to guide postoperative adjuvant chemotherapeutic selection. Studies validating PDOs as a promising predictive biomarker are ongoing.
OBJECTIVE: PDAC patients who undergo surgical resection and receive effective chemotherapy have the best chance of long-term survival. Unfortunately, we lack predictive biomarkers to guide optimal systemic treatment. Ex-vivo generation of PDO for pharmacotyping may serve as predictive biomarkers in PDAC. The goal of the current study was to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of a PDO-guided precision medicine framework of care. METHODS: PDO cultures were established from surgical specimens and endoscopic biopsies, expanded in Matrigel, and used for high-throughput drug testing (pharmacotyping). Efficacy of standard-of-care chemotherapeutics was assessed by measuring cell viability after drug exposure. RESULTS: A framework for rapid pharmacotyping of PDOs was established across a multi-institutional consortium of academic medical centers. Specimens obtained remotely and shipped to a central biorepository maintain viability and allowed generation of PDOs with 77% success. Early cultures maintain the clonal heterogeneity seen in PDAC with similar phenotypes (cystic-solid). Late cultures exhibit a dominant clone with a pharmacotyping profile similar to early passages. The biomass required for accurate pharmacotyping can be minimized by leveraging a high-throughput technology. Twenty-nine cultures were pharmacotyped to derive a population distribution of chemotherapeutic sensitivity at our center. Pharmacotyping rapidly-expanded PDOs was completed in a median of 48 (range 18-102) days. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid development of PDOs from patients undergoing surgery for PDAC is eminently feasible within the perioperative recovery period, enabling the potential for pharmacotyping to guide postoperative adjuvant chemotherapeutic selection. Studies validating PDOs as a promising predictive biomarker are ongoing.
Authors: Nathan G Richards; David W Rittenhouse; Boris Freydin; Joseph A Cozzitorto; Dane Grenda; Hallgeir Rui; Greg Gonye; Eugene P Kennedy; Charles J Yeo; Jonathan R Brody; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kyaw L Aung; Sandra E Fischer; Robert E Denroche; Gun-Ho Jang; Anna Dodd; Sean Creighton; Bernadette Southwood; Sheng-Ben Liang; Dianne Chadwick; Amy Zhang; Grainne M O'Kane; Hamzeh Albaba; Shari Moura; Robert C Grant; Jessica K Miller; Faridah Mbabaali; Danielle Pasternack; Ilinca M Lungu; John M S Bartlett; Sangeet Ghai; Mathieu Lemire; Spring Holter; Ashton A Connor; Richard A Moffitt; Jen Jen Yeh; Lee Timms; Paul M Krzyzanowski; Neesha Dhani; David Hedley; Faiyaz Notta; Julie M Wilson; Malcolm J Moore; Steven Gallinger; Jennifer J Knox Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Vincent P Groot; Stacy Mosier; Ammar A Javed; Jonathan A Teinor; Georgios Gemenetzis; Ding Ding; Lisa M Haley; Jun Yu; Richard A Burkhart; Alina Hasanain; Marija Debeljak; Hirohiko Kamiyama; Amol Narang; Daniel A Laheru; Lei Zheng; Ming-Tseh Lin; Christopher D Gocke; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Michael G Goggins; I Quintus Molenaar; John L Cameron; Matthew J Weiss; Victor E Velculescu; Jin He; Christopher L Wolfgang; James R Eshleman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Pascal Belleau; Dannielle D Engle; Hervé Tiriac; Dennis Plenker; Astrid Deschênes; Tim D D Somerville; Fieke E M Froeling; Richard A Burkhart; Robert E Denroche; Gun-Ho Jang; Koji Miyabayashi; C Megan Young; Hardik Patel; Michelle Ma; Joseph F LaComb; Randze Lerie D Palmaira; Ammar A Javed; Jasmine C Huynh; Molly Johnson; Kanika Arora; Nicolas Robine; Minita Shah; Rashesh Sanghvi; Austin B Goetz; Cinthya Y Lowder; Laura Martello; Else Driehuis; Nicolas LeComte; Gokce Askan; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Hans Clevers; Laura D Wood; Ralph H Hruban; Elizabeth Thompson; Andrew J Aguirre; Brian M Wolpin; Aaron Sasson; Joseph Kim; Maoxin Wu; Juan Carlos Bucobo; Peter Allen; Divyesh V Sejpal; William Nealon; James D Sullivan; Jordan M Winter; Phyllis A Gimotty; Jean L Grem; Dominick J DiMaio; Jonathan M Buscaglia; Paul M Grandgenett; Jonathan R Brody; Michael A Hollingsworth; Grainne M O'Kane; Faiyaz Notta; Edward Kim; James M Crawford; Craig Devoe; Allyson Ocean; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenneth H Yu; Ellen Li; Christopher R Vakoc; Benjamin Hubert; Sandra E Fischer; Julie M Wilson; Richard Moffitt; Jennifer Knox; Alexander Krasnitz; Steven Gallinger; David A Tuveson Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 38.272
Authors: Erik S Knudsen; Uthra Balaji; Brian Mannakee; Paris Vail; Cody Eslinger; Christopher Moxom; John Mansour; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz Journal: Gut Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Jin He; Alex B Blair; Vincent P Groot; Ammar A Javed; Richard A Burkhart; Georgios Gemenetzis; Ralph H Hruban; Kevin M Waters; Justin Poling; Lei Zheng; Daniel Laheru; Joseph M Herman; Martin A Makary; Matthew J Weiss; John L Cameron; Christopher L Wolfgang Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Toni T Seppälä; Jacquelyn W Zimmerman; Reecha Suri; Haley Zlomke; Gabriel D Ivey; Annamaria Szabolcs; Christopher R Shubert; John L Cameron; William R Burns; Kelly J Lafaro; Jin He; Christopher L Wolfgang; Ying S Zou; Lei Zheng; David A Tuveson; James R Eshlemann; David P Ryan; Alec C Kimmelman; Theodore S Hong; David T Ting; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Richard A Burkhart Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Sebastian Schuth; Solange Le Blanc; Teresa G Krieger; Julia Jabs; Christian Conrad; Oliver Strobel; Miriam Schenk; Nathalia A Giese; Markus W Büchler; Roland Eils Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-10-22
Authors: John Kokkinos; Anya Jensen; George Sharbeen; Joshua A McCarroll; David Goldstein; Koroush S Haghighi; Phoebe A Phillips Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Magdalena Huber; Corinna U Brehm; Thomas M Gress; Malte Buchholz; Bilal Alashkar Alhamwe; Elke Pogge von Strandmann; Emily P Slater; Jörg W Bartsch; Christian Bauer; Matthias Lauth Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-10-03 Impact factor: 5.923