Literature DB >> 32645718

Temperature Is Sufficient to Condition a Flavor Preference for a Cold-Paired Solution in Rats.

Kristen E Kay1, Laura E Martin2, Kimberly F James2, Sashel M Haygood3, Ann-Marie Torregrossa2,4.   

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that stimulus temperature modifies taste signaling. However, understanding how temperature modifies taste-driven behavior is difficult to separate as we must first understand how temperature alone modifies behavior. Previous work has suggested that cold water is more rewarding and "satiating" than warm water, and water above orolingual temperature is avoided in brief-access testing. We explored the strength of cold water preference and warm water avoidance by asking: (1) if cold temperature alone was sufficient to condition a flavor preference and (2) if avoidance of warm stimuli is driven by novelty. We addressed these questions using custom-designed equipment that allows us to monitor and maintain solution temperatures. We conducted two-bottle preference tests, after pairing Kool-Aid flavors with 10 or 40 °C. Rats preferred the flavor paired with cold temperature, both while it was cold and for 1 day while solutions were presented at 22 °C. We then examined the role of novelty in avoidance of 40 °C. Rats were maintained on 10, 22, or 40 °C water in their home cage to increase familiarity with the temperatures. Rats were then subject to a series of brief-access taste tests to water or sucrose at 10 to 40 °C. Rats that had 40 °C experience licked more to 40 °C water, but not sucrose, during brief-access testing. In a series of two-bottle preference tests, rats maintained on 40 °C water had a decreased preference for 10 °C water when paired opposite 40 °C water. Together, these data contribute to our understanding of orosensory-driven behavior with water at different temperatures.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  taste; temperature; water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32645718      PMCID: PMC7545254          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  20 in total

1.  Analysis of a new nonnutritive positive reinforcer based on thirst.

Authors:  D HENDRY; R H RASCHE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-10

2.  Thermal stimulation of taste.

Authors:  A Cruz; B G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Interactions of temperature and taste in conditioned aversions.

Authors:  Patrick L Smith; James C Smith; Thomas A Houpt
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-11-26

4.  Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose infusions: a detailed analysis using an electronic esophagus preparation.

Authors:  G Elizalde; A Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1990-01

Review 5.  Modulation of taste processing by temperature.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Water temperature preference shifts during hydration.

Authors:  R M Gold; J Prowse
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1974-08

7.  Tongue cooling: a new reward for thirsty rodents.

Authors:  J Mendelson; D Chillag
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-12-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Food deprivation- and palatability-induced microstructural changes in ingestive behavior.

Authors:  J D Davis; M C Perez
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-01

9.  Temperature modulates taste responsiveness and stimulates gustatory neurons in the rat geniculate ganglion.

Authors:  Joseph M Breza; Kathleen S Curtis; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Water intake, pleasure and water temperature in humans.

Authors:  D Boulze; P Montastruc; M Cabanac
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1983-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  TRPV1-Lineage Somatosensory Fibers Communicate with Taste Neurons in the Mouse Parabrachial Nucleus.

Authors:  Jinrong Li; Md Sams Sazzad Ali; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Tasting temperature: neural and behavioral responses to thermal stimulation of oral mucosa.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2021-01-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.