Literature DB >> 2109327

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose infusions: a detailed analysis using an electronic esophagus preparation.

G Elizalde1, A Sclafani.   

Abstract

The present series of experiments examined the rat's conditioned preference for flavors associated with intragastric (IG) Polycose infusions. Adult female rats were fitted with two chronic intragastric catheters and were trained to drink flavored water (CS+; e.g., cherry-water) paired with IG infusions of 32% Polycose. On alternate days a different flavor (CS-; grape-water) was paired with IG water infusions. The flavored water and chow were available 23 hr/day. In subsequent two-choice tests the rats displayed strong preferences for the CS+ flavor (up to 98%). The CS+ preference persisted for several weeks during extinction tests when both the CS+ and CS- were paired with IG water or with no infusions. The rats also preferred the CS+ to plain water which contrasts with the mild aversion naive rats display to the flavored water. The acquired preference for the CS+ flavor was not as strong, however, as the rats' innate preferences for the taste of saccharin or Polycose. Also, unlike their response to saccharin and Polycose, the rats' acceptance (absolute intake) of the CS+ flavor was not elevated. CS+ intake was increased, though, when saccharin was added to the flavored water. The rats reversed their flavor preference when the reinforcement contingencies were reversed. Also, in the absence of unique flavor cues, the rats learned to prefer, apparently based on somatosensory cues, the sipper tube that was paired with IG Polycose infusions. The effects of flavor and IG Polycose infusions on drinking patterns and caloric intake are also described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2109327     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90043-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  39 in total

Review 1.  Gut-brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 2.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Posttraining flavor exposure in hungry rats after simultaneous conditioning with a nutrient converts the CS into a conditioned inhibitor.

Authors:  David Garcia-Burgos; Felisa González
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 5.  A neural systems analysis of the potentiation of feeding by conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Gorica D Petrovich
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-10-25

6.  Obesity: outwitting the wisdom of the body?

Authors:  Susan E Swithers; Terry L Davidson
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  A mixed design reveals that glucose moieties facilitate extinction of a conditioned taste aversion in rats.

Authors:  Michael E Smith; Ralph Norgren; Patricia Sue Grigson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-06

9.  Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-04

10.  Insular cortex lesions fail to block flavor and taste preference learning in rats.

Authors:  Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.