Literature DB >> 15387021

An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets--are standards as expected?

A C Cash1, S A Good, R V Curtis, F McDonald.   

Abstract

The slots of five upper left central incisor brackets from 11 commercially available bracket systems (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif: Twin Torque Roth, Clarity MBT, and Victory Series MBT; Dentarum, Pforzheim, Germany: Discovery Roth (0.56 mm) and Elegance Plastic Roth; Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany: Mini Mono MBT; TP LaPorte, Indiana: Nu-Edge Roth and Mxi Advant-Edge Roth; Ormco Corp., Orange, Calif: Damon II SL Roth; Ortho Organizers, San Marcos, Calif: Elite Mini Opti-MIM Roth and Elite Mini Opti-MIM MBT) were measured in the 0.022-inch (0.5588 mm) dimension. Measurements were taken after operator calibration, and a digital readout was produced. Results indicate that all bracket slots are oversized. Three bracket systems slots (Twin Torque, Clarity, and Mini Mono) were within 5% (+/-1.08, 1.655, 1.75) of their stated dimensions with essentially parallel slot walls. The Elegance Plastic slot was parallel sided but oversized by 12% (+/-1.15). The geometry of bracket slots was also variable. The Victory Series slot was slightly divergent with the top oversized by 6% (+/-1.035). The Nu-Edge slot was divergent and slot top oversized by 14% (+/-1.32). The Mxi Advant-Edge, Damon II SL, Elite Mini Opti-MIM Roth, and MBT were all convergent, and the base of the Damon slot was oversized by 17% (+/-1.79). The Discovery bracket was convergent, and the slot base was oversized by 24% (+/-1.255), which was the largest recorded variance. This bracket also had a 7% difference between the widths of the slot top and the base. Inaccurate machining of bracket slot dimensions and the use of undersized archwires may directly and adversely affect three-dimensional tooth positioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15387021     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0450:AEOSSI>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  37 in total

1.  Precision of implementing virtual setups for orthodontic treatment using CAD/CAM-fabricated custom archwires.

Authors:  Ralf Müller-Hartwich; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Katharina Schubert
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Control of lower incisor inclination with a completely customized lingual appliance for dentoalveolar compensation of class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Stefan Lossdörfer; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Novel methods reveal that parallelism contributes to the functional vertical slot dimension in ceramic and metal brackets.

Authors:  Matthew Silver; Alfred C Griffin; Lauren Azzopardi; Mohammed I Masoud; Oluwabunmi Tokede; Alfred C Griffin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Precision of indirect bonding of lingual brackets using the Quick Modul System (QMS)®.

Authors:  Katharina Schubert; Thomas Halbich; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Ralf Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Evaluation of crown inclination and angulation after orthodontic treatment using digital models : Comparison to the prescription of the brackets used.

Authors:  Iury Oliveira Castro; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Ana Helena Gonçalves de Alencar; José Valladares-Neto; Carlos Estrela
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  The Cortical Boundary Line as a Guide for Incisor Re-positioning with Anterior Segmental Osteotomies.

Authors:  Abraham Vinod Korath; Ratna Padmanabhan; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-09-23

7.  Measurement of orthodontic bracket tie wing elastic and plastic deformation by arch wire torque expression utilizing an optical image correlation technique.

Authors:  Ryan A Lacoursiere; David S Nobes; Darren L N Homeniuk; Jason P Carey; Hisham H Badawi; Paul W Major
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2009-12-13

8.  Orthodontic Bracket Manufacturing Tolerances and Dimensional Differences between Select Self-Ligating Brackets.

Authors:  Thomas W Major; Jason P Carey; David S Nobes; Paul W Major
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2010-06-27

9.  Comparative analysis of slot dimension in lingual bracket systems.

Authors:  Anton Demling; Marc P Dittmer; Rainer Schwestka-Polly
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Ferdinand M Machibya; Xingfu Bao; Lihua Zhao; Min Hu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.