Literature DB >> 32629079

A Multi-atlas Approach for Active Bone Marrow Sparing Radiation Therapy: Implementation in the NRG-GY006 Trial.

Tahir Yusufaly1, Austin Miller2, Ana Medina-Palomo1, Casey W Williamson1, Hannah Nguyen3, Jessica Lowenstein3, Charles A Leath4, Ying Xiao5, Kevin L Moore1, Katherine M Moxley6, Carlos M Chevere-Mourino7, Tony Y Eng8, Tarrick Zaid9, Loren K Mell10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sparing active bone marrow (ABM) can reduce acute hematologic toxicity in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer, but ABM segmentation based on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is costly. We sought to develop an atlas-based ABM segmentation method for implementation in a prospective clinical trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multiatlas was built on a training set of 144 patients and validated in 32 patients from the NRG-GY006 clinical trial. ABM for individual patients was defined as the subvolume of pelvic bone greater than the individual mean standardized uptake value on registered 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT images. Atlas-based and custom ABM segmentations were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient and mean distance to agreement and used to generate ABM-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy plans. Dose-volume metrics and normal tissue complication probabilities of the two approaches were compared using linear regression.
RESULTS: Atlas-based ABM volumes (mean [standard deviation], 548.4 [88.3] cm3) were slightly larger than custom ABM volumes (535.1 [93.2] cm3), with a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.73. Total pelvic bone marrow V20 and Dmean were systematically higher and custom ABM V10 was systematically lower with custom-based plans (slope: 1.021 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.005-1.037], 1.014 [95% CI, 1.006-1.022], and 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99], respectively). We found no significant differences between atlas-based and custom-based plans in bowel, rectum, bladder, femoral heads, or target dose-volume metrics.
CONCLUSIONS: Atlas-based ABM segmentation can reduce pelvic bone marrow dose while achieving comparable target and other normal tissue dosimetry. This approach may allow ABM sparing in settings where PET/CT is unavailable.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32629079      PMCID: PMC7944643          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

1.  Correlation between radiation dose to ¹⁸F-FDG-PET defined active bone marrow subregions and acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Brent S Rose; Yun Liang; Steven K Lau; Lindsay G Jensen; Catheryn M Yashar; Carl K Hoh; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Loren K Mell; Joel D Kochanski; John C Roeske; Josh J Haslam; Neil Mehta; S Diane Yamada; Jean A Hurteau; Yvonne C Collins; Ernst Lengyel; Arno J Mundt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Radiation-related predictors of hematologic toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer and implications for bone marrow-sparing pelvic IMRT.

Authors:  Kevin Albuquerque; David Giangreco; Courtney Morrison; Mohammed Siddiqui; Jim Sinacore; Ronald Potkul; John Roeske
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Feasibility of atlas-based active bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Nan Li; Sonal S Noticewala; Casey W Williamson; Hanjie Shen; Igor Sirak; Rafal Tarnawski; Umesh Mahantshetty; Carl K Hoh; Kevin L Moore; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  [(18)F]FDG-PET standard uptake value as a metabolic predictor of bone marrow response to radiation: impact on acute and late hematological toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Olgun Elicin; Sharon Callaway; John O Prior; Jean Bourhis; Mahmut Ozsahin; Fernanda G Herrera
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Brent S Rose; Bulent Aydogan; Yun Liang; Mete Yeginer; Michael D Hasselle; Virag Dandekar; Rounak Bafana; Catheryn M Yashar; Arno J Mundt; John C Roeske; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Bone Marrow-sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Cisplatin For Stage IB-IVA Cervical Cancer: An International Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial (INTERTECC-2).

Authors:  Loren K Mell; Igor Sirák; Lichun Wei; Rafal Tarnawski; Umesh Mahantshetty; Catheryn M Yashar; Michael T McHale; Ronghui Xu; Gordon Honerkamp-Smith; Ruben Carmona; Mary Wright; Casey W Williamson; Linda Kasaová; Nan Li; Stephen Kry; Jeff Michalski; Walter Bosch; William Straube; Julie Schwarz; Jessica Lowenstein; Steve B Jiang; Cheryl C Saenz; Steve Plaxe; John Einck; Chonlakiet Khorprasert; Paul Koonings; Terry Harrison; Mei Shi; A J Mundt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Ann H Klopp; Jennifer Moughan; Lorraine Portelance; Brigitte E Miller; Mohammad R Salehpour; Evangeline Hildebrandt; Jenny Nuanjing; David D'Souza; Luis Souhami; William Small; Rakesh Gaur; Anuja Jhingran
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Comparison of treatment tolerance and outcomes in patients with cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a prospective randomized trial or with standard treatment.

Authors:  Mylin A Torres; Anuja Jhingran; Howard D Thames; Charles F Levenback; Diane C Bodurka; Lois M Ramondetta; Patricia J Eifel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Spatial mapping of functional pelvic bone marrow using FLT PET.

Authors:  Sarah M McGuire; Yusuf Menda; Laura L Boles Ponto; Brandie Gross; Mindi TenNapel; Brian J Smith; John E Bayouth
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  1 in total

1.  Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Bone Marrow-Sparing Radiation Therapy for Locoregionally Advanced Cervix Cancer: Final Results From the INTERTECC Phase II/III Trial.

Authors:  Casey W Williamson; Igor Sirák; Ronghui Xu; Lorraine Portelance; Lichun Wei; Rafal Tarnawski; Umesh Mahantshetty; Elena S Heide; Catheryn M Yashar; Michael T McHale; Walter Bosch; Jessica Lowenstein; Cheryl C Saenz; Steve Plaxe; Ramez Eskander; John Einck; Arno J Mundt; Jyoti Mayadev; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 7.038

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.