Literature DB >> 20471182

Radiation-related predictors of hematologic toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer and implications for bone marrow-sparing pelvic IMRT.

Kevin Albuquerque1, David Giangreco, Courtney Morrison, Mohammed Siddiqui, Jim Sinacore, Ronald Potkul, John Roeske.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine factors predictive for hematologic toxicity (HT) associated with concurrent chemoradiation for Stage II through IV cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of 40 women receiving concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer were reviewed. Hematologic toxicity was defined by use of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). Variables predicting for HT including age, body mass index, transfusions, and bone marrow volumes irradiated were included in the data analysis.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 13 (32.5%) had Grade 0 or 1 HT and 27 (67.5%) had Grade 2 through 4 HT (HT2+). Multiple logistic regression analysis of potential predictors showed that only the volume of bone receiving 20 Gy (V20) for whole pelvic bone tended toward significance for predicting HT2+. A strong correlation was noted between HT2+ and V20 (r = 0.8, p < 0.0001). A partitioning analysis to predict HT2+ showed a cutoff value of 79.42% (approximately 80%) for V20 of whole pelvic bone. That is, if the V20 of the whole pelvis exceeds 80%, the risk of HT2+ developing increases by a factor (odds ratio) of 4.5 (95%, confidence interval, 1.08-18.69) (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We have shown a correlation between bone marrow volume radiated and development of HT. This has implications for use of pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy, which can potentially decrease the volume of bone marrow radiated.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20471182     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  42 in total

1.  A prospective phase II study of magnetic resonance imaging guided hematopoietical bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Wang Jianyang; Tian Yuan; Tang Yuan; Wang Xin; Li Ning; Ren Hua; Fang Hui; Feng Yanru; Wang Shulian; Song Yongwen; Liu Yueping; Wang Weihu; Li Yexiong; Jin Jing
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  A Multi-atlas Approach for Active Bone Marrow Sparing Radiation Therapy: Implementation in the NRG-GY006 Trial.

Authors:  Tahir Yusufaly; Austin Miller; Ana Medina-Palomo; Casey W Williamson; Hannah Nguyen; Jessica Lowenstein; Charles A Leath; Ying Xiao; Kevin L Moore; Katherine M Moxley; Carlos M Chevere-Mourino; Tony Y Eng; Tarrick Zaid; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Dose to specific subregions of pelvic bone marrow defined with FDG-PET as a predictor of hematologic nadirs during concomitant chemoradiation in anal cancer patients.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Franco; Francesca Arcadipane; Riccardo Ragona; Adriana Lesca; Elena Gallio; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Paola Cassoni; Vincenzo Arena; Sara Bustreo; Riccardo Faletti; Nadia Rondi; Mario Morino; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  The role of intensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecological radiotherapy: Present and future.

Authors:  Ana Fernandez-Ots; Juanita Crook
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-10-03

5.  Lumbar-sacral bone marrow dose modeling for acute hematological toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiation.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Franco; Riccardo Ragona; Francesca Arcadipane; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Paola Cassoni; Nadia Rondi; Mario Morino; Patrizia Racca; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Bone marrow sparing in intensity modulated proton therapy for cervical cancer: Efficacy and robustness under range and setup uncertainties.

Authors:  Eric Dinges; Nicole Felderman; Sarah McGuire; Brandie Gross; Sudershan Bhatia; Sarah Mott; John Buatti; Dongxu Wang
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Ann H Klopp; Jennifer Moughan; Lorraine Portelance; Brigitte E Miller; Mohammad R Salehpour; Evangeline Hildebrandt; Jenny Nuanjing; David D'Souza; Luis Souhami; William Small; Rakesh Gaur; Anuja Jhingran
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity during concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy for anal cancer.

Authors:  P Franco; R Ragona; F Arcadipane; M Mistrangelo; P Cassoni; N Rondi; M Morino; P Racca; U Ricardi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  The absolute volume of PET-defined, active bone marrow spared predicts for high grade hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation.

Authors:  Y M Zhou; C Freese; T Meier; D Go; K Khullar; M Sudhoff; M Lamba; J Kharofa
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Radiation Dose to the Thoracic Vertebral Bodies Is Associated With Acute Hematologic Toxicities in Patients Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiation for Lung Cancer: Results of a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Christian L Barney; Nicholas Scoville; Eric Allan; Ahmet Ayan; Dominic DiCostanzo; Karl E Haglund; John Grecula; Terence Williams; Meng Xu-Welliver; Gregory A Otterson; Jose G Bazan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.