Literature DB >> 28126303

Bone Marrow-sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Cisplatin For Stage IB-IVA Cervical Cancer: An International Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial (INTERTECC-2).

Loren K Mell1, Igor Sirák2, Lichun Wei3, Rafal Tarnawski4, Umesh Mahantshetty5, Catheryn M Yashar6, Michael T McHale7, Ronghui Xu7, Gordon Honerkamp-Smith7, Ruben Carmona7, Mary Wright7, Casey W Williamson6, Linda Kasaová2, Nan Li6, Stephen Kry8, Jeff Michalski9, Walter Bosch9, William Straube9, Julie Schwarz10, Jessica Lowenstein7, Steve B Jiang7, Cheryl C Saenz7, Steve Plaxe7, John Einck6, Chonlakiet Khorprasert11, Paul Koonings12, Terry Harrison12, Mei Shi3, A J Mundt6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces acute hematologic and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity for patients with locoregionally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We enrolled patients with stage IB-IVA cervical carcinoma in a single-arm phase II trial involving 8 centers internationally. All patients received weekly cisplatin concurrently with once-daily IMRT, followed by intracavitary brachytherapy, as indicated. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of either acute grade ≥3 neutropenia or clinically significant GI toxicity within 30 days of completing chemoradiation therapy. A preplanned subgroup analysis tested the hypothesis that positron emission tomography-based image-guided IMRT (IG-IMRT) would lower the risk of acute neutropenia. We also longitudinally assessed patients' changes in quality of life.
RESULTS: From October 2011 to April 2015, 83 patients met the eligibility criteria and initiated protocol therapy. The median follow-up was 26.0 months. The incidence of any primary event was 26.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.2%-36.9%), significantly lower than the 40% incidence hypothesized a priori from historical data (P=.012). The incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia and clinically significant GI toxicity was 19.3% (95% CI 12.2%-29.0%) and 12.0% (95% CI 6.7%-20.8%), respectively. Compared with patients treated without IG-IMRT (n=48), those treated with IG-IMRT (n=35) had a significantly lower incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia (8.6% vs 27.1%; 2-sided χ2P=.035) and nonsignificantly lower incidence of grade ≥3 leukopenia (25.7% vs 41.7%; P=.13) and any grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity (31.4% vs 43.8%; P=.25).
CONCLUSIONS: IMRT reduces acute hematologic and GI toxicity compared with standard treatment, with promising therapeutic outcomes. Positron emission tomography IG-IMRT reduces the incidence of acute neutropenia.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28126303     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  45 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-Based Treatment Paradigms for Management of Invasive Cervical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Krishnansu S Tewari; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A Multi-atlas Approach for Active Bone Marrow Sparing Radiation Therapy: Implementation in the NRG-GY006 Trial.

Authors:  Tahir Yusufaly; Austin Miller; Ana Medina-Palomo; Casey W Williamson; Hannah Nguyen; Jessica Lowenstein; Charles A Leath; Ying Xiao; Kevin L Moore; Katherine M Moxley; Carlos M Chevere-Mourino; Tony Y Eng; Tarrick Zaid; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Image-Guided Adapted Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander J Lin; Elizabeth Kidd; Farrokh Dehdashti; Barry A Siegel; Sasa Mutic; Premal H Thaker; Leslie S Massad; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Stephanie Markovina; Julie Schwarz; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  The absolute volume of PET-defined, active bone marrow spared predicts for high grade hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation.

Authors:  Y M Zhou; C Freese; T Meier; D Go; K Khullar; M Sudhoff; M Lamba; J Kharofa
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Plan-Optimization Method for Central-shielding Pelvic Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Ryuta Hirai; Tomoaki Tamaki; Mitsunobu Igari; Y U Kumazaki; Shin-Ei Noda; Shingo Kato
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Clinical and dosimetric factors associated with the development of hematologic toxicity in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemotherapy and 3D conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Souto-Del Bosque; Miguel Ángel Cervantes-Bonilla; Gerardo Del Carmen Palacios-Saucedo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-08-13

7.  Acute hematological toxicity during post-operative bowel sparing image-guided intensity modulated radiation with concurrent cisplatin.

Authors:  Shirley Lewis; Supriya Chopra; Pushpa Naga; Siddharth Pant; Epili Dandpani; Naveen Bharadwaj; Umesh Mahantshetty; Reena Engineer; Jamema Swamidas; Jaya Ghosh; Sudeep Gupta; Shyam Shrivastava
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  NRG Oncology/RTOG Consensus Guidelines for Delineation of Clinical Target Volume for Intensity Modulated Pelvic Radiation Therapy in Postoperative Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer: An Update.

Authors:  William Small; Walter R Bosch; Mathew M Harkenrider; Jonathan B Strauss; Nadeem Abu-Rustum; Kevin V Albuquerque; Sushil Beriwal; Carien L Creutzberg; Patricia J Eifel; Beth A Erickson; Anthony W Fyles; Courtney L Hentz; Anuja Jhingran; Ann H Klopp; Charles A Kunos; Loren K Mell; Lorraine Portelance; Melanie E Powell; Akila N Viswanathan; Joseph H Yacoub; Catheryn M Yashar; Kathryn A Winter; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Significant impact on the oncologic outcomes with intensity modulated radiotherapy and conformational radiotherapy over conventional radiotherapy in cervix cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gustavo Arruda Viani; Fred Muller Dos Santos; Juliana Fernandes Pavoni
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-06-07

10.  Feasibility of bone marrow sparing volumetric modulated arc therapy to spare active bone marrow in cervical and vaginal cancer patients: a retrospective dosimetric analysis.

Authors:  Michaela Beavan; Kylie Dundas; Felicity Hudson; Yolanda Surjan; Annie Lau; Shrikant Deshpande; Karen Lim; Viet Do
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2021-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.