Literature DB >> 20400238

Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Brent S Rose1, Bulent Aydogan, Yun Liang, Mete Yeginer, Michael D Hasselle, Virag Dandekar, Rounak Bafana, Catheryn M Yashar, Arno J Mundt, John C Roeske, Loren K Mell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that increased pelvic bone marrow (BM) irradiation is associated with increased hematologic toxicity (HT) in cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy and to develop a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for HT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We tested associations between hematologic nadirs during chemoradiotherapy and the volume of BM receiving≥10 and 20 Gy (V10 and V20) using a previously developed linear regression model. The validation cohort consisted of 44 cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and pelvic radiotherapy. Subsequently, these data were pooled with data from 37 identically treated patients from a previous study, forming a cohort of 81 patients for normal tissue complication probability analysis. Generalized linear modeling was used to test associations between hematologic nadirs and dosimetric parameters, adjusting for body mass index. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to derive optimal dosimetric planning constraints.
RESULTS: In the validation cohort, significant negative correlations were observed between white blood cell count nadir and V10 (regression coefficient (β)=-0.060, p=0.009) and V20 (β=-0.044, p=0.010). In the combined cohort, the (adjusted) β estimates for log (white blood cell) vs. V10 and V20 were as follows: -0.022 (p=0.025) and -0.021 (p=0.002), respectively. Patients with V10≥95% were more likely to experience Grade≥3 leukopenia (68.8% vs. 24.6%, p<0.001) than were patients with V20>76% (57.7% vs. 21.8%, p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis that HT increases with increasing pelvic BM volume irradiated. Efforts to maintain V10<95% and V20<76% may reduce HT.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20400238      PMCID: PMC2907446          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  36 in total

1.  Can intensity-modulated radiation therapy replace brachytherapy in the management of cervical cancer? Counterpoint.

Authors:  Arno J Mundt; John C Roeske
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer: a randomized Phase II study.

Authors:  Alfonso Dueñas-González; Lucely Cetina-Perez; Carlos Lopez-Graniel; Aarón Gonzalez-Enciso; Ernesto Gómez-Gonzalez; Lesbia Rivera-Rubi; Gonzalo Montalvo-Esquivel; David Muñoz-Gonzalez; Juan Robles-Flores; Elisa Vazquez-Govea; Jaime de La Garza; Alejandro Mohar
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Phase III trial comparing radical radiotherapy with and without cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  R Pearcey; M Brundage; P Drouin; J Jeffrey; D Johnston; H Lukka; G MacLean; L Souhami; G Stuart; D Tu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Bone marrow regeneration and extension after extended field irradiation in Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  P Rubin; S Landman; E Mayer; B Keller; S Ciccio
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Green; J M Kirwan; J F Tierney; P Symonds; L Fresco; M Collingwood; C J Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on acute hematologic toxicity in women with gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Clark J Brixey; John C Roeske; Anthony E Lujan; S Diane Yamada; Jacob Rotmensch; Arno J Mundt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  W A Peters; P Y Liu; R J Barrett; R J Stock; B J Monk; J S Berek; L Souhami; P Grigsby; W Gordon; D S Alberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase III study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  David H Moore; John A Blessing; Richard P McQuellon; Howard T Thaler; David Cella; Jo Benda; David S Miller; George Olt; Stephanie King; John F Boggess; Thomas F Rocereto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01.

Authors:  Patricia J Eifel; Kathryn Winter; Mitchell Morris; Charles Levenback; Perry W Grigsby; Jay Cooper; Marvin Rotman; David Gershenson; David G Mutch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Phase I trial of concomitant vinorelbine, cisplatin, and pelvic irradiation in cervical carcinoma and other advanced pelvic malignancies.

Authors:  Arno J Mundt; Jacob Rotmensch; Steven E Waggoner; S Diane Yamada; Gini F Fleming
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  53 in total

1.  A prospective phase II study of magnetic resonance imaging guided hematopoietical bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Wang Jianyang; Tian Yuan; Tang Yuan; Wang Xin; Li Ning; Ren Hua; Fang Hui; Feng Yanru; Wang Shulian; Song Yongwen; Liu Yueping; Wang Weihu; Li Yexiong; Jin Jing
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Impact of bone marrow radiation dose on acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer: principal component analysis on high dimensional data.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Karen Messer; Brent S Rose; John H Lewis; Steve B Jiang; Catheryn M Yashar; Arno J Mundt; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Bone marrow tolerance during postoperative chemotherapy in colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Neil B Newman; Rebecca A Moss; Nell Maloney-Patel; Kristen Donohue; Teresa V Brown; Michael J Nissenblatt; Shou-En Lu; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

4.  A Multi-atlas Approach for Active Bone Marrow Sparing Radiation Therapy: Implementation in the NRG-GY006 Trial.

Authors:  Tahir Yusufaly; Austin Miller; Ana Medina-Palomo; Casey W Williamson; Hannah Nguyen; Jessica Lowenstein; Charles A Leath; Ying Xiao; Kevin L Moore; Katherine M Moxley; Carlos M Chevere-Mourino; Tony Y Eng; Tarrick Zaid; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Highly Efficient Training, Refinement, and Validation of a Knowledge-based Planning Quality-Control System for Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Nan Li; Ruben Carmona; Igor Sirak; Linda Kasaova; David Followill; Jeff Michalski; Walter Bosch; William Straube; Loren K Mell; Kevin L Moore
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Dosimetric predictors of acute haematological toxicity in oesophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jie Lee; Jhen-Bin Lin; Fang-Ju Sun; Kuo-Wei Lu; Chou-Hsien Lee; Yu-Jen Chen; Wen-Chien Huang; Hung-Chang Liu; Meng-Hao Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Dose to specific subregions of pelvic bone marrow defined with FDG-PET as a predictor of hematologic nadirs during concomitant chemoradiation in anal cancer patients.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Franco; Francesca Arcadipane; Riccardo Ragona; Adriana Lesca; Elena Gallio; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Paola Cassoni; Vincenzo Arena; Sara Bustreo; Riccardo Faletti; Nadia Rondi; Mario Morino; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  The role of intensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecological radiotherapy: Present and future.

Authors:  Ana Fernandez-Ots; Juanita Crook
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-10-03

9.  Adjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced high-risk cervical cancer.

Authors:  F Heinzelmann; G Henke; M von Grafenstein; N Weidner; F Paulsen; A Staebler; S Brucker; M Bamberg; M Weinmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Ann H Klopp; Jennifer Moughan; Lorraine Portelance; Brigitte E Miller; Mohammad R Salehpour; Evangeline Hildebrandt; Jenny Nuanjing; David D'Souza; Luis Souhami; William Small; Rakesh Gaur; Anuja Jhingran
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.