Evangelia Katsoulakis1, Yao Yu2, Aditya P Apte3, Jonathan E Leeman4, Nora Katabi5, Luc Morris6, Joseph O Deasy3, Timothy A Chan7, Nancy Y Lee2, Nadeem Riaz8, Vaios Hatzoglou9, Jung Hun Oh10. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs, James A Haley, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. 3. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02189, USA. 5. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. 6. Immunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Immunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Immunogenomics and Precision Oncology Platform, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. 9. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: hatzoglv@mskcc.org. 10. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: ohj@mskcc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify whether radiomic features from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) scans can predict molecular differences between head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) using The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). METHODS: 77 patients from the TCIA with HNSCC had imaging suitable for analysis. Radiomic features were extracted and unsupervised consensus clustering was performed to identify subtypes. Genomic data was extracted from the matched patients in the TCGA database. We explored relationships between radiomic features and molecular profiles of tumors, including the tumor immune microenvironment. A machine learning method was used to build a model predictive of CD8 + T-cells. An independent cohort of 83 HNSCC patients was used to validate the radiomic clusters. RESULTS: We initially extracted 104 two-dimensional radiomic features, and after feature stability tests and removal of volume dependent features, reduced this to 67 features for subsequent analysis. Consensus clustering based on these features resulted in two distinct clusters. The radiomic clusters differed by primary tumor subsite (p = 0.0096), HPV status (p = 0.0127), methylation-based clustering results (p = 0.0025), and tumor immune microenvironment. A random forest model using radiomic features predicted CD8 + T-cells independent of HPV status with R2 = 0.30 (p < 0.0001) on cross validation. Consensus clustering on the validation cohort resulted in two distinct clusters that differ in tumor subsite (p = 1.3 × 10-7) and HPV status (p = 4.0 × 10-7). CONCLUSION: Radiomic analysis can identify biologic features of tumors such as HPV status and T-cell infiltration and may be able to provide other information in the near future to help with patient stratification.
PURPOSE: To identify whether radiomic features from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) scans can predict molecular differences between head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) using The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). METHODS: 77 patients from the TCIA with HNSCC had imaging suitable for analysis. Radiomic features were extracted and unsupervised consensus clustering was performed to identify subtypes. Genomic data was extracted from the matched patients in the TCGA database. We explored relationships between radiomic features and molecular profiles of tumors, including the tumor immune microenvironment. A machine learning method was used to build a model predictive of CD8 + T-cells. An independent cohort of 83 HNSCC patients was used to validate the radiomic clusters. RESULTS: We initially extracted 104 two-dimensional radiomic features, and after feature stability tests and removal of volume dependent features, reduced this to 67 features for subsequent analysis. Consensus clustering based on these features resulted in two distinct clusters. The radiomic clusters differed by primary tumor subsite (p = 0.0096), HPV status (p = 0.0127), methylation-based clustering results (p = 0.0025), and tumor immune microenvironment. A random forest model using radiomic features predicted CD8 + T-cells independent of HPV status with R2 = 0.30 (p < 0.0001) on cross validation. Consensus clustering on the validation cohort resulted in two distinct clusters that differ in tumor subsite (p = 1.3 × 10-7) and HPV status (p = 4.0 × 10-7). CONCLUSION: Radiomic analysis can identify biologic features of tumors such as HPV status and T-cell infiltration and may be able to provide other information in the near future to help with patient stratification.
Authors: Eugene J Koay; Mark J Truty; Vittorio Cristini; Ryan M Thomas; Rong Chen; Deyali Chatterjee; Ya'an Kang; Priya R Bhosale; Eric P Tamm; Christopher H Crane; Milind Javle; Matthew H Katz; Vijaya N Gottumukkala; Marc A Rozner; Haifa Shen; Jeffery E Lee; Huamin Wang; Yuling Chen; William Plunkett; James L Abbruzzese; Robert A Wolff; Gauri R Varadhachary; Mauro Ferrari; Jason B Fleming Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Kranthi Marella Panth; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Natasja G Lieuwes; Ala Yaromina; Ludwig Dubois; Philippe Lambin Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: N L Hoefling; J B McHugh; E Light; B Kumar; H Walline; M Prince; C Bradford; T E Carey; S K Mukherji Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Eran Segal; Claude B Sirlin; Clara Ooi; Adam S Adler; Jeremy Gollub; Xin Chen; Bryan K Chan; George R Matcuk; Christopher T Barry; Howard Y Chang; Michael D Kuo Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2007-05-21 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Ralph T H Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Frank J P Hoebers; Hugo J W L Aerts; Wouter J C van Elmpt; Shao Hui Huang; Biu Chan; John N Waldron; Brian O'sullivan; Philippe Lambin Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Chad Tang; Brian Hobbs; Ahmed Amer; Xiao Li; Carmen Behrens; Jaime Rodriguez Canales; Edwin Parra Cuentas; Pamela Villalobos; David Fried; Joe Y Chang; David S Hong; James W Welsh; Boris Sepesi; Laurence Court; Ignacio I Wistuba; Eugene J Koay Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jung Hun Oh; Aditya P Apte; Evangelia Katsoulakis; Nadeem Riaz; Vaios Hatzoglou; Yao Yu; Usman Mahmood; Harini Veeraraghavan; Maryam Pouryahya; Aditi Iyer; Amita Shukla-Dave; Allen Tannenbaum; Nancy Y Lee; Joseph O Deasy Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2021-04-30