| Literature DB >> 32605601 |
Xue Ling Liu1, Li Qin Yang1,2, Feng Tao Liu3, Pu-Yeh Wu4, Yong Zhang4, Han Zhuang5, Yong Hong Shi5, Jian Wang3, Dao Ying Geng6, Yu Xin Li7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we explored whether the proposed short-echo-time magnitude (setMag) image derived from quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) could resemble NM-MRI image in substantia nigra (SN), by quantitatively comparing the spatial similarity and diagnosis performances for Parkinson's disease (PD).Entities:
Keywords: Neuroimaging; Parkinson disease; Pars compacta; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; Substantia nigra
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32605601 PMCID: PMC7325114 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01828-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Fig. 1The segmentation of SNhyper regions of interest (ROI) on setMag and NM-MRI images of a representative subject. A zoomed in view of midbrain area on the setMag and NM-MRI images are shown in a and c, respectively. The corresponding left and right SNhyper regions of interest (ROI) segmented by rater 1 (red), rater 2 (green) and their consensual voxels (yellow) are shown in b and d
Demographic information and clinical characteristics of healthy controls and PD patients
| Variable | HCs ( | PD ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male: female) | 9:06 | 7:11 | 0.23 |
| Age (median (range), year) | 58 (43–66) | 61 (40–79) | 0.09 |
| Disease duration (month) | – | 21.22 ± 14.60 | – |
| MDS UPDRS-III score | – | 21.78 ± 13.96 | – |
| H-Y stage (median (range)) | – | 1 (1–3) | – |
Inter-rater reliability on setMag and NM-MRI images
| ICCs of the SNhyper volume | DSCs of the SNhyper ROI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| setMag | NM-MRI | setMag | NM-MRI | |||||
| Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | |
| HCs | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.92 ± 0.02 | 0.93 ± 0.01 | 0.89 ± 0.06 | 0.93 ± 0.04 |
| PD | 0.77 | 0.93 | 0.70 | 0.94 | 0.89 ± 0.08 | 0.89 ± 0.08 | 0.86 ± 0.07 | 0.90 ± 0.05 |
The DSC and volume of consensual voxels identified by both of two raters
| Group | Left | Right | Mean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCs | DSC | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.04 | 0.81 ± 0.04 | |
| Volume | setMag | 97.67 ± 11.34 | 94.33 ± 12.61 | 95.99 ± 10.60 | |
| NM-MRI | 94.53 ± 11.11 | 97.47 ± 9.32 | 96.00 ± 8.49 | ||
| p | 0.45 | 0.31 | 0.99 | ||
| PD | DSC | 0.76 ± 0.093 | 0.73 ± 0.067 | 0.74 ± 0.07 | |
| Volume | setMag | 83.28 ± 14.54 | 71.94 ± 16.73 | 77.61 ± 13.06 | |
| NM-MRI | 79.78 ± 13.45 | 78.33 ± 15.99 | 79.06 ± 11.93 | ||
| p | 0.36 | 0.053 | 0.62 |
p represents the comparison of the volume between SNhyper of setMag and NM-MRI images using paired t-test or Wilcoxon test
Fig. 2Comparison of the mean SNhyper volume on setMag and NM-MRI images. Comparison of the mean SNhyper volume on both setMag (A) and NM-MRI (B) images for HCs and PD patients. The scatter-box diagram denotes the 25th and 75th percentiles with the line denoting the mean value. Significant differences between PD and HCs are represented as: ****P < 0.0001
Receiver operating characteristic analysis of setMag and NM-MRI for the differentiation of PD patients from healthy controls
| AUC | Cut-off value (mm3) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| setMag | 0.904 | ≤ 84.50 | 83.33 | 93.33 | 87.88 | 0.96 |
| NM-MRI | 0.906 | ≤ 88.00 | 88.89 | 86.67 | 87.88 |
P value is the AUC comparison for mean SNhyper volume to differentiate PD from HCs on setMag and NM-MRI images
Fig. 3Receiver operator characteristic analyses of the mean SNhyper volume for differentiating PD from HCs on setMag and NM-MRI images. There was no significant difference between ROC curves of mean SNhyper volume (P = 0.96) on setMag and NM-MRI images