| Literature DB >> 22634862 |
Christian Langkammer1, Ferdinand Schweser, Nikolaus Krebs, Andreas Deistung, Walter Goessler, Eva Scheurer, Karsten Sommer, Gernot Reishofer, Kathrin Yen, Franz Fazekas, Stefan Ropele, Jürgen R Reichenbach.
Abstract
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a novel technique which allows determining the bulk magnetic susceptibility distribution of tissue in vivo from gradient echo magnetic resonance phase images. It is commonly assumed that paramagnetic iron is the predominant source of susceptibility variations in gray matter as many studies have reported a reasonable correlation of magnetic susceptibility with brain iron concentrations in vivo. Instead of performing direct comparisons, however, all these studies used the putative iron concentrations reported in the hallmark study by Hallgren and Sourander (1958) for their analysis. Consequently, the extent to which QSM can serve to reliably assess brain iron levels is not yet fully clear. To provide such information we investigated the relation between bulk tissue magnetic susceptibility and brain iron concentration in unfixed (in situ) post mortem brains of 13 subjects using MRI and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. A strong linear correlation between chemically determined iron concentration and bulk magnetic susceptibility was found in gray matter structures (r=0.84, p<0.001), whereas the correlation coefficient was much lower in white matter (r=0.27, p<0.001). The slope of the overall linear correlation was consistent with theoretical considerations of the magnetism of ferritin supporting that most of the iron in the brain is bound to ferritin proteins. In conclusion, iron is the dominant source of magnetic susceptibility in deep gray matter and can be assessed with QSM. In white matter regions the estimation of iron concentrations by QSM is less accurate and more complex because the counteracting contribution from diamagnetic myelinated neuronal fibers confounds the interpretation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22634862 PMCID: PMC3413885 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage ISSN: 1053-8119 Impact factor: 6.556
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of the QSM framework with data from a deceased 89-year-old subject: the gradient echo phase is unwrapped and preprocessed with the SHARP algorithm while the magnitude additionally serves for the identification of unreliable voxels (represented by dark pixels). Using a total variation regularization strategy incorporating a priori information from the complex gradient echo signal, the resulting susceptibility maps are reconstructed.
Chemically determined mean iron concentrations and mean bulk tissue magnetic susceptibilities grouped by brain regions.
| N | Iron concentration | Bulk susceptibility | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/kg wet tissue) | (ppm) | ||||
| Globus pallidus | 25 | 205 ± 39 | (169–239) | 0.155 ± 0.038 | (0.119–0.182) |
| Putamen | 49 | 160 ± 37 | (132–183) | 0.129 ± 0.051 | (0.085–0.170) |
| Caudate nucleus | 49 | 105 ± 27 | (86–121) | 0.078 ± 0.032 | (0.053–0.097) |
| Thalamus | 49 | 50 ± 12 | (41–58) | 0.012 ± 0.035 | (− 0.014–0.039) |
| Corpus callosum | 67 | 29 ± 10 | (21–32) | − 0.012 ± 0.028 | (− 0.031–0.005) |
| Frontal WM | 73 | 47 ± 11 | (36–54) | − 0.009 ± 0.026 | (− 0.008–0.026) |
| Temporal WM | 72 | 46 ± 11 | (39–52) | − 0.003 ± 0.028 | (− 0.021–0.015) |
| Occipital WM | 73 | 36 ± 9 | (29–42) | − 0.000 ± 0.016 | (− 0.007–0.010) |
Values are given in mean ± standard deviation (inter-quartile range).
Susceptibility values are given relative to the reference region (occipital white matter) so that positive and negative values represent more and less diamagnetic bulk magnetic susceptibility relative to the reference region, respectively.
N represents the number of samples included in the analysis.
WM = white matter.
Fig. 2SHARP processed phase (top row) and resulting quantitative susceptibility maps (bottom row) of an in vivo 58-year-old subject (left) with a deceased 57-year-old subject (right). The body temperature of the deceased subject was 23.7 °C at the beginning of the MRI experiment. Substantially more vessels are visible in the post mortem map because of the fully deoxygenated blood. The contrast in the images is equal (SHARP phase from − 1 to 1 rad; QSM from − 0.1 to 0.2 ppm).
Fig. 3Correlation of bulk magnetic susceptibility with measured iron concentration. The line represents the regression of all data points and the dotted lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals.
Results of the linear regression analysis of bulk magnetic susceptibility and measured iron concentration.
| Bulk susceptibility | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| r | Regression slope | Regression offset | |
| (ppm per mg/kg wet weight) | (ppm) | ||
| All structures | 0.87 | 0.00097 ± 0.00003 | − 0.037 ± 0.002 |
| Gray matter | 0.84 | 0.00089 ± 0.00005 | − 0.022 ± 0.006 |
| White matter | 0.27 | 0.00055 ± 0.00012 | − 0.023 ± 0.005 |
| Theory for ferritin (36.5 °C) | – | 0.00132 | – |
Slope and offset values are given in mean ± standard deviation.
The p-values were below 0.001 in all analyses.
r = Pearson regression coefficient.
Regression equation: χ = slope ∗ iron concentration (in mg/kg wet tissue) ± offset.
Fig. 4Regional variations of bulk magnetic susceptibility in the basal ganglia in a 54-years-old deceased subject. Image contrast is from − 0.1 ppm (red) to 0.25 ppm (yellow).