| Literature DB >> 32605072 |
Hemendra Ghimire1, Chakravarthy Garlapati2, Emiel A M Janssen3, Uma Krishnamurti4, Gengsheng Qin5, Ritu Aneja2,6, A G Unil Perera1,6.
Abstract
Protein structural alterations, including misfolding and aggregation, are a hallmark of several diseases, including cancer. However, the possible clinical application of protein conformational analysis using infrared spectroscopy to detectEntities:
Keywords: ATR-FTIR; breast cancer biomarkers; infrared spectroscopy; protein secondary structure; serum; spectral deconvolution
Year: 2020 PMID: 32605072 PMCID: PMC7407230 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the second derivatives curves of the FTIR absorbance spectra. (A) PCA scores plots (PC1 × PC2) with a 95% confidence ellipse. The data related to the control groups (black dots enclosed by a black shaded ellipse) and breast cancer (BC) (red dots surrounded by a red-shaded ellipse) are clustered together with different magnitudes and directions. (B) Scree plot of eigenvalues showing the percentage variance of components one and two is significant compared to the others.
Figure 2Identification of discriminatory bands. (A) Ensemble averages of normalized serum spectra derived from control, n = 10, and BC, n = 10. This wider range of spectra is presented to show the quality of spectra, which overcomes the noise and atmospheric contamination, while measuring them at a resolution of 4 cm−1. (B) Corresponding Student t-test p-values for the control and BC. (C) The second derivative absorbance spectra is confined to the amide-I region, covering 1600–1700 cm−1. (D) Difference between the absorbance spectra of the control and BC (shown in Figure 1A), indicating the up- and down-regulation of proteins, carbohydrates, and nucleic acids in the serum of breast cancer patients.
Discriminatory IR bands for BC serum samples from controls, and primary biomolecular assignments giving rise to the main contributions for the absorbance (taken from [68,69,70,71,72,73,74]). Amide regions and the complex region of carbohydrates and nucleic acids show the discriminating potential.
| Wavenumber (cm−1) | Biomolecular Assignments |
|---|---|
| 1700–1600 | Amide I: sensitive to protein secondary structures of proteins, which arises mainly due to C=O stretching vibrations and the C-N groups. |
| 1580–1480 | Amide II: sensitive for protein conformation, originates mainly from the in-plane N-H bending mode along with C-N and C-C stretching vibrations. |
| 1140–1000 | Carbohydrates: sensitive to C-O, C-C stretching, C-H bending, and nucleic acids: sensitive to deoxyribose/ribose DNA, RNA, νs(PO2−). |
Figure 3Protein secondary structure analysis. (A) Representative second derivatives of absorbance spectra at the amide-I absorbance region. (B) Deconvolution of the amide-I region: the baseline-corrected spectra fitted with 6 GFEB by approximating the number and position of the minima of second derivatives, which simulated fits (▪▪▪) to the experimental curve (—). (C) Integral area of GBEF representing α helix and β sheet. (D) The ratio of α helix and β sheet energy bands, which proves an elevation of β sheet and drop off α helix structures due to malignancies. (E) The ratio of IR absorbance at amide II (I1556) to its value at amide III (I1295). (F) Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for the ratio of the integral area of the energy bands representing α-helix and β-sheet protein secondary structures and the respective absorbance at amide II and amide III. The maximum values of sensitivity and specificity are 90% and 90% for signature α/β, while these values are 100% and 80% for signature I1556/I1295, respectively.
Figure 4Understanding the protein secondary structures and physics of IR interaction. (A) Parallel β-pleated sheet structure of proteins. N-H groups in the backbone of one strand form hydrogen bonds with the C=O groups in the backbone of the adjacent strand to form a β-sheet. (B) Right-handed α-helix structures of proteins. The backbone N-H group donates a hydrogen bond to the backbone C=O group, contributing to the helical structure of the α-helix.
Figure 5(A) Deconvolution of the complex band of carbohydrates and nucleic acids at 1000–1140 cm−1. The number and position of the six bands used to fit the experimental curve were determined by using the minima of secondary curves, as in the amide I case. (B) Bar graph representation of the average value of the integral sum, which shows a significant difference between the control and BC case. (C) Bar graph of the average absorbances at wavenumber position 1020 cm−1, which is mainly due to the presence of DNA. It also shows a significant difference between the control and BC cases.
Figure 6Schematic of attenuated total reflection Fourier transforms infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectrometer integrated with two micro-controllers (micro-processors) A and B. Controller A extracts the information about the signal–sample interaction, while controller B stores the spectral analyzing software application in the clinical domain.
Identifying BC-associated discriminatory protein bands in serum samples. These include the integral ratio of Gaussian Function Energy Bands (GFEB), representing α-helix and β-sheet protein secondary structures, as well as the absorbance ratio of amide II (1556 cm−1) to amide III (1295 cm−1). Quantified values (in A.U.) of the average and range of spectral signatures taken from the control and BC samples. The optimal cutoff and the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and p-values are also shown.
| Signatures | Average ± st. Error | Range of Values | Cutoff Value | AUC | Sensitivity % | Specificity % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | BC | Control | BC | ||||||
| α/β | 2.61 ± 0.06 | 2.07 ± 0.09 | 2.27–2.95 | 1.77–2.62 | 2.25 | 0.96 | 90 | 90 | 1.4 × 10−4 |
| I1556/ I1295 | 2.10 ± 0.01 | 2.24 ± 0.02 | 2.04–2.17 | 2.13–2.36 | 2.12 | 0.98 | 100 | 80 | 2.7× 10−5 |