| Literature DB >> 25975566 |
Udi Zelig1, Eyal Barlev2, Omri Bar3, Itai Gross4, Felix Flomen5, Shaul Mordechai6, Joseph Kapelushnik7, Ilana Nathan8, Hanoch Kashtan9, Nir Wasserberg10, Osnat Madhala-Givon11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most of the blood tests aiming for breast cancer screening rely on quantification of a single or few biomarkers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of detecting breast cancer by analyzing the total biochemical composition of plasma as well as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using infrared spectroscopy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25975566 PMCID: PMC4455613 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1414-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Demography, clinical characteristics and diagnosis of the control and cancer groups included in this study
| Cancer | Control | |
|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 29 | 30 |
| Age | ||
| Range | 28.6 – 83.9 | 20.4 – 75.8 |
| Average ± STD | 60.1 ± 13.2 | 45.7 ± 16.5 |
| History of Smoking | 29.6 % | 19.2 % |
| Family History of Cancer | ||
| Breast | 41.3 % | 63.3 % |
| Ovary | 31 % | 53.3 % |
| Histology | ||
| IDC | (22) 75.9 % | |
| ILC | (4) 13.8 % | |
| IDC + ILC | (1) 3.4 % | |
| Mucinous Ca | (1) 3.4 % | |
| HG DCIS | (1) 3.4 % | |
| Stage | ||
| I | (1) 3.4 % | |
| II | (14) 48.3 % | |
| III | (4) 13.8 % | |
| NA/NR | (10) 34.5 % | |
| Nodule Size (mm) | ||
| ≤10 | (8) 27.6 % | |
| 10 ≤ 20 | (8) 27.6 % | |
| 20< | (11) 37.9 % | |
| NA/NR | (2) 6.9 % | |
| Receptors | ||
| ER+ | (25) 86.2 % | |
| PR+ | (22) 75.9 % | |
| Her2+ | (2) 6.9 % | |
| NA/NR | (4) 13.8 % |
Fig. 1FTIR-MSP spectra of PBMCs of cancer patients and healthy controls. (a) Average of the absorption spectra of PBMC of each study group between 1800 cm−1 and 700 cm−1. The spectra are vector normalized. Each spectrum of a single subject is an average of five measurements at different locations of the PBMCs dried film. The absorbance bands of the major functional bonds of the bio-molecules are marked. (b) Second derivative expanded spectra of PBMCs from each subjects’ group are presented. The mean ± SEM for each of the data sets is represented by the thickness of the graph lines. (c) t-test analysis of the second derivative spectra of control group vs. cancer patients group. The t-test is represented by p-Value (in log scale) for each wavenumber along the IR spectra. Statistically significant differences are present at various wave-numbers which are indicated by p-values below 0.05 represented by the black horizontal solid line
Fig. 2T-test analysis of the FTIR-MSP second derivative spectra of PBMCs of cancer patients group. The t-test is represented by p-Value (in log scale) for each wavenumber along the IR spectra. Comparison between the following pathological parameters: (a) Size of mass bellow 20 mm vs. above 20 mm; Single mass vs. multiple masses; (b) Cancer stage 1 vs. stage 2; malignancy type - Ductal vs. Lobular Carcinoma; positive vs. negative for vascular invasion. Statistically significant differences are present at various wavenumbers which are indicated by p-values below 0.05 marked by black horizontal solid line
Fig. 3FTIR-MSP spectra of plasma of cancer patients, ‘benign’ patients and healthy controls. (a) Average of the absorption spectra of plasma of each study group between 1800 cm−1 and 700 cm−1. The spectra are vector normalized. Each spectrum of a single subject is an average of five measurements at different locations of the plasma dried film. The absorbance bands of the major functional bonds of the bio-molecules are marked. (b) and (c), Expanded second derivative spectra of plasma from each subjects’ group are presented. The mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) for each data set (healthy, benign, and cancer) is represented by the thickness of the curves
Fig. 4T-test analysis of the FTIR-MSP second derivative spectra of plasma of cancer patients group. The t-test is represented by p-Value (in log scale) for each wavenumber along the IR spectra. Comparison between the following pathological parameters: (a) Size of mass bellow 20 mm vs. above 20 mm; Single mass vs. multiple masses (b) Cancer stage 1 vs. stage 2; malignancy type - Ductal vs. Lobular Carcinoma; positive vs. negative for vascular invasion. Statistically significant differences are found at various wave-numbers indicated by p-values below 0.05 displayed by the black horizontal solid line
Fig. 5ROC curves for healthy and benign vs. cancer. ROC curves were calculated using combined features selected from PBMCs and Plasma spectral data of each subject. Training set ROC (solid curve) as well as validation set ROC (dot curve) used in the Monte-Carlo Cross validation is presented