Literature DB >> 15705873

Protein expression profiling identifies subclasses of breast cancer and predicts prognosis.

Jocelyne Jacquemier1, Christophe Ginestier, Jacques Rougemont, Valérie-Jeanne Bardou, Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret, Jeannine Geneix, José Adélaïde, Alane Koki, Gilles Houvenaeghel, Jacques Hassoun, Dominique Maraninchi, Patrice Viens, Daniel Birnbaum, François Bertucci.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease whose evolution is difficult to predict by using classic histoclinical prognostic factors. Prognostic classification can benefit from molecular analyses such as large-scale expression profiling. Using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays, we have monitored the expression of 26 selected proteins in more than 1,600 cancer samples from 552 consecutive patients with early breast cancer. Both an unsupervised approach and a new supervised method were used to analyze these profiles. Hierarchical clustering identified relevant clusters of coexpressed proteins and clusters of tumors. We delineated protein clusters associated with the estrogen receptor and with proliferation. Tumor clusters correlated with several histoclinical features of samples, including 5-year metastasis-free survival (MFS), and with the recently proposed pathophysiologic taxonomy of disease. The supervised method identified a set of 21 proteins whose combined expression significantly correlated to MFS in a learning set of 368 patients (P < 0.0001) and in a validation set of 184 patients (P < 0.0001). Among the 552 patients, the 5-year MFS was 90% for patients classified in the "good-prognosis class" and 61% for those classified in the "poor-prognosis class" (P < 0.0001). This difference remained significant when the molecular grouping was applied according to lymph node or estrogen receptor status, as well as the type of adjuvant systemic therapy. In multivariate analysis, the 21-protein set was the strongest independent predictor of clinical outcome. These results show that protein expression profiling may be a clinically useful approach to assess breast cancer heterogeneity and prognosis in stage I, II, or III disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15705873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  69 in total

1.  Clinical proteomics: present and future prospects.

Authors:  Nicole M Verrills
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-05

2.  Hierarchical clustering identifies a subgroup of colonic adenocarcinomas expressing crypt-like differentiation markers, associated with MSS status and better prognosis.

Authors:  Laure Droy-Dupré; Céline Bossard; Christelle Volteau; Stéphane Bezieau; Christian L Laboisse; Jean-François Mosnier
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Differences in subtype distribution between screen-detected and symptomatic invasive breast cancer and their impact on survival.

Authors:  N Kobayashi; M Hikichi; K Ushimado; A Sugioka; Y Kiriyama; M Kuroda; T Utsumi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Tissue array methods for high-throughput clinicopathologic research.

Authors:  Hye Seung Lee; Woo Ho Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 4.679

5.  Novel model for basaloid triple-negative breast cancer: behavior in vivo and response to therapy.

Authors:  Lisa D Volk-Draper; Sandeep Rajput; Kelly L Hall; Andrew Wilber; Sophia Ran
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Alternative Polyadenylation in Triple-Negative Breast Tumors Allows NRAS and c-JUN to Bypass PUMILIO Posttranscriptional Regulation.

Authors:  Wayne O Miles; Antonio Lembo; Angela Volorio; Elena Brachtel; Bin Tian; Dennis Sgroi; Paolo Provero; Nicholas Dyson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Protein expression profile and prevalence pattern of the molecular classes of breast cancer--a Saudi population based study.

Authors:  Dalal M Al Tamimi; Mohamed A Shawarby; Ayesha Ahmed; Ammar K Hassan; Amal A AlOdaini
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Quantitative assessment of tissue biomarkers and construction of a model to predict outcome in breast cancer using multiple imputation.

Authors:  John W Emerson; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Lyndsay Harris; David L Rimm; David P Tuck
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-12-23

9.  CD146 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in human breast tumors and with enhanced motility in breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Gwladys Zabouo; Anne-Marie Imbert; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Pascal Finetti; Thomas Moreau; Benjamin Esterni; Daniel Birnbaum; François Bertucci; Christian Chabannon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Molecular characteristics of screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancers and their impact on survival.

Authors:  S J Dawson; S W Duffy; F M Blows; K E Driver; E Provenzano; J LeQuesne; D C Greenberg; P Pharoah; C Caldas; G C Wishart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.