Considering the current context of research aiming at proposing new bioplastics with low costs and properties similar to fossil-based commodities currently on the market, in the present work, a hybrid blend containing a prevalent amount of cheap inedible cereal flour (70 wt %) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) (30 wt %) has been prepared by a simple, eco-friendly, and low-cost processing methodology. In order to improve the interfacial tension and enhance the adhesion between the different phases at the solid state, with consequent improvement in microstructure uniformity and in material mechanical and adhesive performance, the PBS fraction in the blend was replaced with variable amounts (0-25 wt %) of PBS-based green copolymer, which exerted the function of a compatibilizer. The copolymer is characterized by an ad hoc chemical structure, containing six-carbon aliphatic rings, also present in the flour starch structure. The two synthetic polyesters obtained through two-stage melt polycondensation have been deeply characterized from the molecular, thermal, and mechanical points of view. Copolymerization deeply impacts the polymer final properties, the crystallizing ability, and stiffness of the PBS homopolymer being reduced. Also, the prepared ternary blends were deeply investigated in terms of microstructure, thermal, and mechanical properties. Lastly, both pure blend components and ternary blends were subjected to disintegration experiments under composting conditions. The results obtained proved how effective was the compatibilizer action of the copolymer, as evidenced by the investigation conducted on morphology and mechanical properties. Specifically, the mixtures with 15 and 20 wt % Co appeared to be characterized by the best mechanical performance, showing a progressive increase of deformation while preserving good values of elastic modulus and stress. The disintegration rate in compost was found to be higher for the lower amount of copolymer in the ternary blend. However, after 90 days of incubation, the blend richest in copolymer content lost 62% of weight.
Considering the current context of research aiming at proposing new bioplastics with low costs and properties similar to fossil-based commodities currently on the market, in the present work, a hybrid blend containing a prevalent amount of cheap inedible cereal flour (70 wt %) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) (30 wt %) has been prepared by a simple, eco-friendly, and low-cost processing methodology. In order to improve the interfacial tension and enhance the adhesion between the different phases at the solid state, with consequent improvement in microstructure uniformity and in material mechanical and adhesive performance, the PBS fraction in the blend was replaced with variable amounts (0-25 wt %) of PBS-based green copolymer, which exerted the function of a compatibilizer. The copolymer is characterized by an ad hoc chemical structure, containing six-carbon aliphatic rings, also present in the flour starch structure. The two synthetic polyesters obtained through two-stage melt polycondensation have been deeply characterized from the molecular, thermal, and mechanical points of view. Copolymerization deeply impacts the polymer final properties, the crystallizing ability, and stiffness of the PBS homopolymer being reduced. Also, the prepared ternary blends were deeply investigated in terms of microstructure, thermal, and mechanical properties. Lastly, both pure blend components and ternary blends were subjected to disintegration experiments under composting conditions. The results obtained proved how effective was the compatibilizer action of the copolymer, as evidenced by the investigation conducted on morphology and mechanical properties. Specifically, the mixtures with 15 and 20 wt % Co appeared to be characterized by the best mechanical performance, showing a progressive increase of deformation while preserving good values of elastic modulus and stress. The disintegration rate in compost was found to be higher for the lower amount of copolymer in the ternary blend. However, after 90 days of incubation, the blend richest in copolymer content lost 62% of weight.
Governments,
citizens, and companies currently recognize that plastics
have a negative impact besides the great benefits they bring to our
lives. The types of plastics we use and dispose as waste have serious
implications for human health and the environment. The transition
to plastics meeting our needs, while being harmless to both human
and animal health and to the environment, has become a mandatory and
urgent problem. Science, industry, and public policies are working
to encourage the introduction of eco-friendly materials. Among these
plastics, thermoplastic starch (TPS), obtained when the ordered granular
structure of starch is disrupted by heating with a plasticizer or
gelatinization agent,[1] could represent
a solution. TPS has gotten increasing importance in recent years as
it is economically viable, classified as biodegradable or compostable,
and can be obtained from a range of native sources, such as wheat,
rice, corn, potato, pea, and cassava.[2−4] However, pure TPS has
several drawbacks, such as brittleness, too high degradation rate
in environmental conditions, and mechanical properties that are very
sensitive to moisture content. Its blending with synthetic low-molecular-weight
molecules and polymers represents an effective strategy to overcome
these problems, being blending a simple, rapid, and cheap method to
achieve a proper combination of properties not generally obtainable
with a single polymeric material.[4−6] To improve its processability
and mechanical properties, TPS, obtained by treating starch with glycerol,
has been blended with traditional fossil-based polyethylene (PE),[7,8] polypropylene (PP),[9] and polyamide (PA).[10,11]Several blends of TPS with various completely biodegradable
polymers
have been also developed to achieve a totally biodegradable material.[12,13] Among these biodegradable polymers, noteworthy is poly(butylene
succinate) (PBS), obtainable from 100% renewable resources, characterized
by a wide workability window and mechanical response very similar
to the LDPE commodity polymer.Most polymer blends are immiscible
and need to be compatibilized.
Compatibilization, in most cases, is realized by addition of a compatibilizer,
being necessary to guarantee (i) optimization of the interfacial tension,
(ii) stabilization of the morphology against high stresses during
forming, and (iii) enhanced adhesion between the phases in the solid
state, with consequent improvement in microstructure uniformity but
also in material performance, specifically mechanical and adhesive
properties. The combination of starch with PBS has been widely studied,
with the response of both gelatinized and untreated starch mixed with
PBS confirming their limited miscibility if not properly plasticized
and chemically modified.[14−16] Zeng et al. reported that PBS
and plasticized starch can be blended in the presence of reactive
PBS phases (NCO-terminated), which produced blends characterized by
improved tensile strength, remarkably superior to thermoplastic starch
(TPS), and at the same time enhanced hydrophobicity with consequent
reduction of water absorption. The improvement obtained was higher
with higher content of reactive poly(butylene succinate) (RPBS).[17] Another interesting in situ compatibilization
approach has been considered by Suchao-In et al.[18] In this case, PBS was grafted on starch through a single
step process to obtain starch-g-PBS. The possibility
of using maleated PBS was taken into account by different authors.[19,20] The published papers showed that the addition of RPBS to TPS/PBS
blends guarantees a significant improvement of the mechanical response
in terms of strength and elongation at break due to the formation
of smaller phase domains, better distributed, especially in higher
content of compatibilizer.The effect of plant oil addition
in a quite low amount (0.5 wt
%) was also tested,[21] and also, in this
case, the TPS/PBS films showed significantly improved mechanical properties.
Recently, Zhang et al. demonstrated that mixtures of starch, glycerol,
and tartaric acid (TPS-TA) prepared by reactive extrusion were very
effective in altering positively the impact strength of PBS/TPS-TA,
with TA inducing “sea-island” morphology.[22] If several groups have studied the effect on
the final material properties of different flours, such as rice[23] and corn,[24,25] few groups have been
dealing with the effect of starch origin, meaning amylose or amylopectin
content, on blend miscibility. Li et al.[26] and Ayu et al.[25] used waxy (0% amylose)
and normal (26% amylose) corn starches to prepare blends of poly(butylene
succinate) and thermoplastic starch (WTPS and NTPS, respectively).
The results described in these papers indicated that the plasticization
and processing of waxy corn starch were easier than those of normal
corn starch and the combination of PBS and WTPS produced some excellent
performances, such as good processability, superior mechanical properties,
and higher water resistance.To the best of the authors’
knowledge, there are no reports
on plasticized flours with significant protein contents, with the
exception of a paper from Ku-marsilla and Verbeek,[27] who analyzed blends of PBS and thermoplastic protein set
at 50 wt % in the presence or absence of compatibilizers (poly(methylene
diphenyl diisocyanate) (pMDI) and poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)) at variable
loadings, dissolved in water prior to extrusion, with methylene diphenyl
diisocyanate showing less water absorption compared to not compatibilized
blends.In our work, we attempted, for the first time, the realization
of PBS-based blends containing high content of plasticized wheat flour
(TPWF), characterized by alveographic parameters typical of a soft
grain cultivar, which is able to give more deformable thermoplastic
films.It has to be emphasized that, in the present paper, a
cheap inedible
cereal flour (as in the case of wheat grains and flours contaminated
by fungi or infested by insects and rodents, which undergo sanitary
restrictions) has been employed in place of chemically refined starches
to prepare blends with PBS, whose cost is still relatively high, by
adopting a processing methodology that should avoid the environmental
high costs of reactive extrusion with a maleated fraction as the compatibilizer
agent. According to this, the blends were realized by considering
a prevalent content of plasticized wheat flour (70 wt %) with a moderate
amount of polymer matrix (30 wt %). To favor the TPWF/PBS compatibilization,
both from the chemical and physical points of view, variable fractions
(0–25 wt %) of an ad hoc synthetized PBS-based copolymer, containing
Pripol 1009 moieties, have been employed. In this copolymeric system,
as previously reported by some of us,[28] the succinic acid subunit was partially replaced with the Pripol
1009 subunit, the last containing an aliphatic six-carbon atom ring
connected to the −COOR groups through PE-like segments and
presenting quite long side branches. The insertion of the aliphatic
ring in the polymer matrix, also present in the flour starch structure,
should enhance the TPWF/PBS chemical compatibility. Moreover, the
PE-like sequences present both in the main chain and as side branches
increase the macromolecular mobility and, as a consequence, decrease
the elastic modulus with respect to the PBS homopolymer,[28] favoring also the physical compatibility between
the TPWF matrix and polymer component. Besides, the higher thermal
stability and the lower melting temperature of the P(BS-co-Pripol) system[28] allows limiting undesired
thermal degradation of the final material. Finally, the compatibilizer
also permits tuning the composting rate[28] according to the final application envisioned for the composites.
Experimental Part
Materials
Mantegna wheat flour was
selected after a preliminary screening among a total of 30 provided
by ASSAM Marche (Jesi, Ancona Province). Its soft grains were ground
by a laboratory mill with a standard procedure and machinery adjustment.
The protein content was 12.6%, while its alveographic parameters were
measured (P/L = 0.21, W = 63). Selected flour was plasticized with 23%, w/w of glycerol,
as reported elsewhere.[29,30]Butanediol (BD), dimethyl
succinate (DMS), and Ti(OBu)4 (TBT) were purchased from
Sigma Aldrich. Pripol 1009 was kindly supplied by Croda Italiana S.p.A.
(Mortara, Italy).The syntheses of the PBS homopolymer and P(BS-co-Pripol) copolymer (namely, Co) were conducted via solvent-free
two-step
polycondensation. In a 200 mL glass reactor, the reagents and the
TBT catalyst (200 ppm) were added. The system was placed in a thermostated
silicon oil bath and stirred at 100 rpm by a two-bladed centrifugal
stirrer equipped with an overhead motor (IKA-Werke GmbH & Co.,
Staufen, Germany). During the first stage, the temperature was set
at 180 and 190 °C (namely, T1st)
for PBS and P(BS-co-Pripol), respectively, under
a constant nitrogen flow. The conditions were maintained until 90%
of the expected amount of methanol was distilled off, about 90 min.
During the second stage, the temperature was increased to 230 °C
(namely, T2st), while the pressure was
slowly decreased to 0.1 mbar. This last step lasted until a constant
value of torque was observed, about 2 h. The products were discharged
from the glass reactor and allowed to cool to room temperature. The
so-obtained materials appear like beige-colored solids. The molecular
formulas and the synthesis details of PBS and P(BS-co-Pripol) are reported in Figure and Table , respectively.
Figure 1
Chemical formula of PBS and P(BS-co-Pripol) (the
length of Pripol cyclohexane side branches is not fixed, 7/9 carbon
atoms each).
Table 1
Reagent Amounts and
Operative Conditions
of the PBS Homopolymer
polymer
DMS (mol %)
Pripol 1009 (mol %)
BD (mol %)
T1st (°C)
T2nd (°C)
t1st (min)
t2nd (min)
PBS
100
120
180
230
90
120
P(BS-co-Pripol)
85
15
120
190
230
90
120
Chemical formula of PBS and P(BS-co-Pripol) (the
length of Pripol cyclohexane side branches is not fixed, 7/9 carbon
atoms each).The two repeating units
differ for the acid moiety: the succinic
subunit being linear and short and the Pripol one being longer with
an aliphatic six-carbon ring containing aliphatic branches.
Preparation of TPWF-Based Formulations
Thermoplastic
plasticized flour-based films (TPF) were manufactured
using a twin-screw microextruder (DSM Explorer 5&15 CC Micro Compounder)
provided with a microfilm die and coupled with a line for the cast
film (DSM Film Device). Wheat flour and plasticizers were mixed at
low speed in a laboratory mixer (planetary mixer, 60 rpm for 3 min).
After that, the mixture was introduced in the extruder considering
a further mixing at a screw speed of 30 rpm, mixing time of 3 min,
and an adequate profile of temperature for the three sections of the
extruder (feeding, metering, and die) of 135–140–145
°C. The same temperature profile was adopted for the preparation
of TPF blends at different homopolymer/copolymer (PBS/Co) weight amounts.
Film strips a few meters long, about 30 mm wide, and 280 μm
thick were obtained. Visual images and adopted codes for the produced
films are reported in Figure and Table , respectively.
Figure 2
Visual image of TPWF-based films.
Table 2
Compositions of TPWF-Based Films
TPWF
PBS
Co
TPWF
100
0
0
PBS
0
100
0
Co
0
0
100
70TPWF/30PBS
70
30
0
70TPWF/25PBS/5Co
70
25
5
70TPWF/20PBS/10Co
70
20
10
70TPWF/15PBS/15Co
70
15
15
70TPWF/10PBS/20Co
70
10
20
70TPWF/5PBS/25Co
70
5
25
Visual image of pan class="Chemical">TPWF-based films.
Characterization of the
PBS Homopolymer and
P(BS-co-Pripol) Copolymer
The chemical structures
of the synthetized polymers and the composition as well as the repeating
unit distribution of the copolymer were determined by 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectroscopy acquired at room temperature
with a Varian Inova 400-MHz (Palo Alto, CA, USA). NMR analysis was
also employed to determine any composition changes in degraded samples.Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was used to measure the molar
mass and the polydispersity index. An Agilent 1100 HPLC instrument
equipped with a PLgel 5 μm MiniMIX-C column and a refractive
index detector was employed (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA,
USA). The system was eluted with chloroform at a rate of 0.3 mL/min,
at 30 °C. Polystyrene standards (2000–100,000 g/mol) were
used to obtain a molecular-weight calibration curve.
Characterization of TPWF-Based Formulations
The microstructures
of the produced formulations were investigated
by scanning electron microscope analysis of fractured surfaces (FESEM,
Supra 25-Zeiss), obtained by cryofracturing the samples in liquid
nitrogen. The surfaces were gold-sputtered in order to provide electric
conductivity, and the samples were observed using an accelerating
voltage of 2.5 kV.Thermal characterization of TPWF-based formulations
was carried out by both thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC). TGA (Seiko Exstar 6300) experiments were
performed for each sample from 30 to 600 °C at 10 °C/min
under a nitrogen atmosphere (250 mL/min) in order to evaluate the
role of polymer addition in the thermal stability of the TPWF matrix.DSC (DSC-TA instrument, Q200) measurements (first heating, cooling,
and second heating scans) were performed in the temperature range
of −50 to 150 °C, at a heating/cooling rate of 10 °C/min.
Three specimens were used to characterize each material.Tensile
tests of neat TPWF and TPWF-based systems were performed
to evaluate the effect of PBS addition on the mechanical response
of the TPWF matrix. The tests were performed using a universal test
machine (Lloyd Instruments, LR30KPlus) according to the UNI ISO 527
on 20 × 150 mm rectangular specimens about 280 μm thick.
Young’s modulus (E), maximum stress (σmax), strain at maximum stress (emax σ), stress at break (σb), and elongation at break
(εb) were calculated from the resulting stress–strain
curves with software specific to the test machine: NEXYGENPlus Materials
Testing. The measurements were done at room temperature, and at least
five specimens for each formulation were tested.Surface wettability
of the TPWF-based films was studied through
static advancing water contact angle measurements with a standard
goniometer (FTA2000, First Ten Angstroms, Inc., Portsmouth, UK) equipped
with a camera, and drop shape analysis (SW21; FTA32 2.0 software,
First Ten Angstroms, Inc., Portsmouth, UK) was used to test the water
contact angle at room temperature. The contact angle was determined
by randomly putting five drops of distilled water (2 μL) with
a syringe onto the film surfaces, and after 1 s, the average values
of five measurements for each drop were used.Disintegrability
in composting conditions was carried out following
the European span class="Chemical">tandard ISO 20200:2015. The test determines, on a laboratory
scale, the degree of disintegration of plastic materials under simulated
intensive aerobic composting conditions. The degree of disintegration D was calculated in percent by normalizing the specimen
weight at different days of incubation to the initial weight using eq where mi is initial pan class="Disease">dry plastic mass, mf is dry plastic material mass after the test.
Films
of dimension 15 mm × 15 mm (mean thickness, 280 μm)
were weighed and buried into the organic substrate at 4–6 cm
depth in the perforated boxes guaranteeing the aerobic conditions
and incubated at 58 °C and 50% humidity. The systems can be considered
disintegrable according to the European standard when 90% of the plastic
sample weight is lost within 90 days of analysis. In order to simulate
the disintegrability in compost, a solid synthetic waste was prepared,
mixing sawdust, rabbit food, compost inoculum supplied by Genesu S.p.a.,
starch, sugar, oil, and urea. The specimens tested were taken out
at different times (3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 42, 56, 77, and 90 days),
washed with distilled water, and dried in an oven at 37 °C for
24 h. The surface microstructures of Co and TPWF-based systems before
the composting and at different days (21, 56, and 90 days) of incubation
were investigated by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM),
while the photographs of the specimens were taken for visual comparison.
Result and Discussion
Homopolymer
and Copolymer Characterization
The chemical structures and
copolymer compositions of the synthesized
samples have been determined by 1H-NMR spectroscopy, while
the chemical architecture of the copolymer has been evaluated by 13C-NMR analysis. The relative data are collected in Table . The chemical shift
peaks for the PBS homopolymer (data not shown) are as follows: δ
4.2 ppm (t, 4H); δ 2.6 ppm (s, 4H); δ 1.7 ppm (t, 4H).
In Figure are the
reported 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra of the P(BS-co-Pripol) sample together with the peak assignment. For
both polymers, no additional peaks have been detected allowing the
exclusion of the occurrence of side reactions during the synthesis
process.
Table 3
Chemical Characterization
Data of
the PBS Homopolymer and P(BS-co-Pripol) Copolymer
polymer
S (mol %)
Pripol (mol %)
Mn (g/mol)
PDI
b
LBS
LBPripol
PBS
100
52,000
2.0
P(BS-co-Pripol)
82
18
46,000
2.4
0.98
5.0
1.3
Figure 3
1H-NMR (a) and 13C-NMR (b) spectra of P(BS85BPripol15)
with the peak assignment. Magnification of the 13C-NMR
spectrum in the 64.4–63.5 ppm region (c) and schematic representation
of S–B–Pripol, Pripol–B–Pripol, and S–B–S
triads.
1H-NMR (a) and 13C-NMR (b) spectra of P(BS85BPripol15)
with the peak assignment. Magnification of the 13C-NMR
spectrum in the 64.4–63.5 ppm region (c) and schematic representation
of S–B–Pripol, Pripol–B–Pripol, and S–B–S
triads.The actual composition of the copolymer has been calculated
from
the normalized area of the c and f peaks in the 1H-NMR
spectrum (Figure a)
corresponding to succinic and Pripol moieties, respectively (Table ). The degree of randomness
(b) and the block length (L) have
been calculated considering the 13C-NMR[28,31,32] (Figure b), in particular the region in between 64.4 and 63.5
ppm (Figure c) where
the carbon atoms of the −OCH2– group are
located. In this range of ppm, four different signals are observed:
the k peak corresponding to S–B–S triads, the o peak
due to Pripol–B–Pripol triads, and the k1 and o1 peaks related to the S–B–Pripol
triads. The degree of randomness was determined through the equationwith PS–Pripol being
the probability of finding an S subunit
next to a Pripol one and PPripol–S being the probability of finding a Pripol subunit next to an S one. PS–Pripol and PPripol–S can be expressed as followswhere Ik, Ik, Io, and Io represent
the integrated intensities of the resonance peaks of the S–B–S,
S–B–Pripol, Pripol–B–S, and Pripol–B–Pripol
triads, respectively.Additionally, the average lengths of the
BS and pan class="Chemical">BPripol blocks
in the pan class="Chemical">copolymer chain are defined as
The degree of randomness
appeared to be very close to 1, indicating
a random distribution along the macromolecular chain of BS and BPripol
repeating units, and the average block lengths of the BS and BPripol
sequences (LBS and LBPripol), reported in Table , are directly proportional to the molar amounts of
succinic and the Pripol subunits contained in the polymer backbone.
In Table , molecular
weight data (Mn) are also collected. GPC
analysis revealed high and comparable molecular weight for both the
synthetized polymers and polydispersity indexes compatible with the
synthetic strategy adopted. It is worth highlighting that high Mn is necessary for the material processing.
Morphological Properties of TPWF-Based Formulation
The morphologies of fractured surfaces for TPWF/polymer blends
were observed by FESEM (Figure ), and differences were found as a function of blend composition:
in detail, TPWF exhibited a continuous and homogeneous surface, while
PBS and Co showed rough surfaces, with a semiductile fracture behavior.
The morphological variations for blends may be associated with the
differences in the viscosity of polymers and TPWF along with the varying
hybrid compositions. No visible starch granules can be detected on
the fracture surface of TPWF/polymer blends, even if the incompatible
sea-island bi-phase structure was noted in the case of 70TPWF/30PBS.
Clear phase separation was indeed observed on the fractured surface,
with TPWF as the continuous phase and PBS as the dispersed phase,
with formation of microcavities at the filler–matrix interface,
suggesting poor compatibility. In the ternary systems, the disappearance
of matrix fibrillation from the fracture surface from low content
of Co up to the highest value is notable due to the compatibilizer
effect of Co. Besides that, different surface roughness profiles were
achieved, essentially due to diverse interaction of the polymeric
phase with starchy particles of the plasticized flour. In detail,
dimensional reduction of the conglomerates and better dispersion of
the starchy particles were obtained with increasing content of Co,
in perfect line with the results of mechanical and wettability characterization
presented below. Additionally, there is no clear delamination from
the polymer matrix, confirming the improved filler–matrix interactions
in the Co compatibilized blends.
Figure 4
FESEM images of fractured cross sections
of TPWF, PBS, Co, and
TPWF-based films.
FESEM images of fractured cross sections
of TPWF, PBS, Co, and
TPWF-based films.
Thermal
Analysis of TPWF-Based Formulations
TGA
Analysis
Thermogravimetric
analysis of the blends was carried out. Figure a,b shows the curves and the derivative mass
loss curves as a function of temperature for neat PBS and random copolymer
Co, processed at 135 and 145 °C, while Figure c,d shows the profiles for the different
TPWF/polymer blends.
Figure 5
Residual mass (a,c) and derivative mass loss (b,d) curves
of PBS
and Co processed at 135 and 145 °C (TG (a) and DTG (b)) and TPWF-based
films (TG (c) and DTG (d)).
Residual mass (a,c) and derivative mass loss (b,d) curves
of PBS
and Co processed at 135 and 145 °C (TG (a) and DTG (b)) and TPWF-based
films (TG (c) and DTG (d)).The PBS homopolymer undergoes thermal degradation in a single step,
as visible in Figure b, with no significant mass loss until about 300 °C and complete
decomposition around 430 °C, which is in agreement with the literature
data: the primary mass loss is caused by the volatilization of small
molecules, including succinic acid and butylene glycol, followed by
major thermal degradation of PBS chains, due to random chain scission
at the ester bonds, with the formation of carboxylic and vinyl end
groups.[33,34] In the case of P(BS-co-Pripol),
Co, the weight loss curve is shifted at higher temperature and the
degradation takes place in two steps: the first one is proportional
to the amount of BS co-units, and the second one is related to the
content of BPripol sequences. The thermal stability improvement is
consequent to the introduction of the Pripol subunit along the PBS
macromolecular chain, determining a reduction of the easily thermally
degradable ester groups that, in turn, are replaced with quite long
and thermally more stable PE-like segments. Concerning the effect
of the processing temperature, no appreciable differences can be evidenced
on the thermal stability by changing this parameter during the sample
preparation, from 135 to 145 °C. This evidence confirms that
no thermal degradation occurs under the processing conditions (temperature
and time).In the presence of the thermoplastic wheat flour,
three distinct
regions can be evidenced in the TGA curves (Figure c). The initial weight loss is generally
due to the loss of volatiles (water), reduced in the case of blends,
indicating a limited moisture absorption in comparison with neat TPWF.
After that, a visible further decrease in the 125–250 °C
range was noted, specifically for the blend systems containing 15
and 20 wt % PBS homopolymer, that could be ascribed to volatilization
of excess glycerol. After the evaporation of plasticizers, the TPWF
fraction started to degrade, with an onset degradation temperature
that moved from 232 °C for neat TPWF up to 268 °C for the
different ternary systems. Even the peak of derivative weight loss,
related to the superposition of PBS and flour fraction, was slightly
shifted from 306 °C for the material having no polymer fractions
to 313 °C in the case of systems containing Co and PBS at different
weight contents. The final stage represents the main degradation zone
of PBS and Co (above 400 °C), which were in line with the DTG
degradation profiles observed in Figure b. The TGA results, in particular the variation
of onset degradation temperature and maximum degradation temperature,
showed a thermal stability improvement by blending TPWF with PBS or
Co, in this last case to a greater extent.
DSC
Analysis
Figure shows the calorimetric traces of TPWF and
the two polymer matrices, PBS and Co, subjected to extrusion process.
The TPWF first scan calorimetric trace shows a wide endothermic peak
due to water release by evaporation. No signals in the following cooling
and heating scans have been detected for TPWF, indicating that no
thermal transitions take place. The first DSC scan profiles of both
PBS and Co (Figure a) are typical of semicrystalline polymers, being both characterized
by both the glass-to-rubber transition step at low temperature and
the endothermic melting peaks at higher temperature. In the case of
the PBS homopolymer, just before the melting phenomenon, at 90 °C,
a little intense exotherm coming from the crystallization of smaller
crystals can be detected. In particular, the glass transition temperature
of PBS located at −35 °C is reduced by copolymerization,
reaching a value of −42 °C in the random copolymer. The
longer acid co-unit, in fact, increases the macromolecular mobility
thanks to the PE-like segments of the Pripol moiety and to the branches
on the aliphatic ring, exerting a plasticizing effect. The PBS melting
phenomenon, as a consequence of the introduction of Pripol co-units,
undergoes changes, being the homopolymer melting process characterized
by a single peak at 114 °C, which in the copolymer moves at lower
temperature (97 °C). Together with the Tm decrease, copolymerization also determines the reduction
of the melting enthalpy ΔHm, i.e.,
a less intense endotherm, indicating a lower amount of crystal phase
in Co that, in addition, is characterized by a lower degree of perfection.
Moreover, copolymerization leads to the disappearance of the exotherm
centered at 90 °C in the PBS trace. After melting, the polymers
have been cooled down at 10 °C/min, and the corresponding DSC
curves are reported in Figure b. As one can see, both samples crystallize during the cooling
step as indicated by the exotherms at 75 and 44 °C for PBS and
Co, respectively. As one might expect, the co-unit introduction slows
down the crystallization process. The second DSC heating scan for
the PBS homopolymer (Figure c) is practically the same as the first, while for Co, an
enlargement and a slight shift of the endothermic peak position toward
lower temperature are detected, indicating a further decrease of crystalline
perfection portion during the cooling step.
Figure 6
DSC thermograms (first
heating scan (a), second heating scan (b),
and cooling scan (c)) of TPWF, PBS, and Co films.
DSC thermograms (first
heating scan (a), second heating scan (b),
and cooling scan (c)) of TPWF, PBS, and Co films.In Figure , the
DSC curves of the TPWF/polymer blends are reported. As one can see,
the presence of the signals of all the components in the blend can
be detected, with the corresponding intensity being proportional to
their amount. The first heating scan traces are very similar to the
second scan ones; nevertheless, the as-extruded ternary blends present
the wide endothermic peak due to water release of the TPWF, underlying
the melting peaks of the polymer matrix. As a consequence, the calculation
of the temperature (Tc, Tm) and enthalpy (ΔHc, ΔHm) values of the polymer thermal
phenomena, occurring during cooling and heating scans, has been carried
out after water removal, i.e., in the cooling and second heating scans,
and results are reported in Table .
Figure 7
DSC thermograms (first heating scan (a), second heating
scan (b),
and cooling scan (c)) of TPWF-based films.
Table 4
DSC Characterization Data of Ternary
Blends: Cooling Step from the Melt and Subsequent Heating Scan
cooling
2nd
heating
sample
Tc (°C)
ΔHc (J/g)
Tg (°C)
Tcc (°C)
ΔHcc (J/g)
Tm (°C)
ΔHm (J/g)
70TPWF/30PBS
71
21
–48
97
4
113
24
70TPWF/25PBS5Co
71
16
–49
97
3
112
22
70TPWF/20PBS10Co
70
22
–49
96
3
112
20
70TPWF/15PBS15Co
56
18
–49
94
2
112
14
70TPWF/10PBS20Co
55
16
–50
94
4
112
11
70TPWF/5PBSCo
48
15
–50
94
14
112
4
DSC thermograms (first heating scan (a), second heating
scan (b),
and cooling scan (c)) of TPWF-based films.The crystallization capability of the polymer matrix during the
cooling step (Figure b) is not compromised by the TPWF presence, being all the blends
characterized by comparable crystallization enthalpy values (Table ). Nevertheless, a
progressive displacement of the exothermic peaks toward lower temperature
from 71 °C for 70TPWF/30PBS to 48 °C for 70TPWF/5PBS/25Co
is observed. Moreover, in the blends containing comparable amounts
of PBS and Co, two overlapping exotherms can be evidenced, originating
from BS sequence crystallization in the homopolymer and the copolymer,
respectively. Concerning the second heating scan (Figure c), as mentioned above, it
results very similarly in the first one, with the only difference
that the peak of water evaporation is no longer present. The presence
of TPWF determines a decrease of the glass-to-rubber transition temperature
evidencing its plasticizer effect. As temperature increases, the PBS-rich
blends exhibit the crystallization peak at around 97 °C (as observed
for the neat homopolymer) followed by the melting endotherm centered
at 112 °C, with a shoulder at lower temperature (105 °C)
ascribable to the melting of the less perfect crystal fraction. As
the Co amount rises, the exotherm at 97 °C is replaced by an
endothermic peak (94 °C), ascribable to the melting of the Co
crystalline phase, whose intensity grows at the expense of the PBS
crystals melting at higher temperature.
Tensile
Behavior of TPWF-Based Formulations
Table shows the
characteristic values of the tensile tests. In Figure , the graphs of the tensile tests carried
out on the three polymeric matrices (PBS, Co, and TPWF) highlight
the characteristic mechanical behavior of each material; the PBS homopolymer
shows high elastic modulus and tensile strength values but modest
deformation, which ends with a brittle fracture. The TPWF shows much
lower mechanical performances, both in terms of the modulus and tensile
strength, while it deforms plastically 5 times more than the PBS.
The obvious differences in mechanical behavior give evidence of the
low compatibility between PBS and TPWF, already observed by FESEM
investigation. Co shows an intermediate behavior between the two previous
ones, showing good Young’s modulus and stress resistance values
with tough behavior and high deformation capability.
Table 5
Parameters from Tensile Tests for
the TPWF-Based Films
Young’s modulus, E (MPa)
maximum stress, σmax (MPa)
strain at maximum stress, εmax σ (%)
stress at break, σb (MPa)
strain at break, εb (%)
TPWF
4.7 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.1
45.8 ± 4.9
0.32 ± 0.1
48.4 ± 4.7
PBS
402 ± 23
22.7 ± 1.6
10.8 ± 2.8
22.6 ± 1.6
10.8 ± 2.8
Co
120 ± 5
18.4 ± 1.4
240 ± 36
12.2 ± 3.5
253
± 34
70TPWF/30PBS
83.2
± 7.6
3.6 ± 0.1
8.8 ± 1.5
3.5 ± 01
8.9 ± 1.7
70TPWF/25PBS/5Co
72.0 ± 7.3
2.9 ± 0.4
8.1 ± 0.6
2.8 ±
0.4
8.2 ± 0.6
70TPWF/20PBS/10Co
69.9 ± 8.6
2.7 ± 0.4
7.5 ± 0.5
2.6 ± 0.3
7.6 ±
0.5
70TPWF/15PBS/15Co
62.2
± 3.0
2.8 ± 0.1
11.0 ±
0.1
2.6 ± 0.2
11.1 ± 0.1
70TPWF/10PBS/20Co
56.2 ± 3.9
3.1 ± 0.2
12.9 ± 1.2
3.0 ± 0.3
13.0 ± 1.3
70TPWF/5PBS/25Co
37.4 ± 2.6
2.7
± 0.2
20.5 ± 1.1
2.52 ±
0.2
21.0 ± 1.1
Figure 8
Stress–strain
curves of TPWF, PBS, and Co films (a) and
TPWF-based films (b) and stress at maximum (c) and stress at break
and Young’s modulus (d) of TPWF-based films.
Stress–strain
curves of TPWF, PBS, and Co films (a) and
TPWF-based films (b) and stress at maximum (c) and stress at break
and Young’s modulus (d) of TPWF-based films.The formulations with a prevalence of TPWF are intended
to achieve
low-cost mixtures, the addition of PBS to improve performance while
maintaining the eco-sustainability characteristics of the final materials
produced, and the further introduction of Co to enhance the TPWF/PBS
chemical and physical compatibility. The mixtures of TPWF with different
amounts of the two synthetic polymers have the purpose of correlating
the PBS/Co ratio with the mechanical behavior of the blends. Table reports the results
of tensile tests performed on neat samples and TPWF-based formulations.
As one can see from Figure b–d, the addition of the 30 wt % PBS homopolymer (70TPWF/30PBS)
produces a significant increase in resistance compared to neat TPWF;
however, the deformation values remain low as for the neat PBS. In
the 70TPWF/25PBS/5Co and 70TPWF/20PBS/10Co blends, the substitution
of 5 and 10 wt % PBS homopolymers with the copolymer produces exclusively
a modulus and resistance reduction without improvement of deformability.
The mixtures with 15 and 20 wt % Co (70TPWF/15PBS/15Co and 70TPWF/10PBS/20Co)
show a progressive increase of deformation preserving good values
of elastic modulus and stress. The formulation with TPWF and 25 wt
% Co (70TPWF/5PBS/25Co) shows the greatest deformation of the mix
set (≈21%) but also a slight reduction in strength. The results
obtained suggest that PBS confers strength and rigidity to the mixture,
while Co acts both as the reinforcement and toughener. The Co material
also acts as the link between the rigid and fragile behaviors of PBS
and the low resistance and plastic deformation response to stress
of TPWF. In line with the results of a previous paper from us,[29] where we have already observed that a system
based on thermoplastic wheat flour mixed with polycaprolactone in
a ratio of 75:25, without any compatibilizing agent, showed a high
level of deformation (450%) (although not connected with a satisfactory
mechanical behavior (tensile strength, 5 MPa)), we can here conclude
that the approach of substituting a great part (more than 70 wt %)
of the polymeric phase in a blend can certainly represent an acceptable
compromise and a satisfactory solution to the problem of time limited
use of fossil-based sources in the packaging sector. Nevertheless,
the comparison with the reference TPWF (tensile strength (1.1 ±
0.1 MPa) and deformation at break (75 ± 6, %)) clearly indicated
that the adopted solution could represent a challenge to the improvement
of limited performance of flour-based biopolymers. Chabrat et al.[35,36] also successfully produced wheat flour/PLA blends. In this case,
it has been proven that adding 20 parts of PLA to plasticized wheat
flour (83.3% wheat flour (at its equilibrium humidity) and 16.7% glycerol)
increased its Young’s modulus up to 709 MPa and decreased its
elongation at break to 7%. The use of citric acid was also investigated:
it was verified that compatibility of the phases, depending on the
use of extra water (or not) during the extrusion, was promoted, in
a competition between glycerol and citric acid for the plasticization.Anyway, these are the sole cases present in the literature where
a prevalent fraction of plasticized flour was mixed with a biopan class="Chemical">polymeric
matrix and adequate tensile strength and ductility were definitely
achieved.
Looking at the comparison with PBS based blends, as
in the case
of substitution of thermoplastic starch with thermoplastic flour,
we should underline that good mechanical performance was, in general,
reached to the expense of either high refining costs for the starch-based
component or higher content of PBS fraction, which always surpassed
the weight content of the plasticized flour. In the paper of Yin et
al.[19] it was demonstrated that tensile
strength and elongation at break of TPS/PBS (60/40) blend were only
6.4 MPa and 4%, respectively, and the best results were obtained only
when the inversion of the TPS:PBS ratio (40/60) was considered. The
direct comparison with the results from our investigation highlighted
that, even at a prevailing amount of plasticized not refined starches,
acceptable properties for films to be used in the packaging sector
can be reached.Nevertheless, none of the cited works investigated
in depth the
compost disintegration of the produced films, which is extremely imporpan class="Chemical">tant
when the materials are intended for packaging use. According to this,
we extended the research to the evaluation of produced materials’
attitude to undergo compost disintegration.
Simulated
Disintegration in Compost
The post-use performance of TPWF-
and PBS-based formulations was
evaluated by performing disintegrability tests under composting conditions,
according to the EN ISO 20200:2015. Figure shows the images of all different TPWF-based
films at the initial time (before the disintegration in composting
conditions) and after several incubation times, while Figure exhibits the disintegration
values at different incubation times on a laboratory scale. It was
observed that all samples changed their color and dimensions just
after the first days of incubation, especially for neat TPWF film
and TPWF-based formulations, consequent to the hydrolytic degradation.
Neat TPWF films after only 3 days appeared completely fractured, with
the behavior being related to the hydrophilic nature of flour-based
films that facilitates the water attack.
Figure 9
Visual observation of
TPWF, PBS, Co, and TPWF-based films before
and after different days in composting conditions.
Figure 10
Disintegrability values of TPWF, PBS, Co, and TPWF-based films
before and after different days in composting conditions.
Visual observation of
TPWF, PBS, Co, and TPWF-based films before
and after different days in composting conditions.Disintegrability values of TPWF, PBS, Co, and TPWF-based films
before and after different days in composting conditions.The disintegration kinetics of PBS and Co films are completely
different with respect to neat TPWF being, in general, lower. Nevertheless,
the polymer composting is accelerated in the binary and ternary blends.
This is due to the presence of a very high amount of hydrophilic groups
in the TPWF fraction of the composites, which easily absorb water
and microorganisms from the soil and increase the contact area of
the water and microorganisms with the polymer matrix. This phenomenon
makes it easier for PBS and Co to hydrolyze and disintegrate and,
consequently, increases the weight loss.[37] The TPWF film completely disintegrated after 14 days of incubation,
while after the same time of incubation, PBS and 70TPWF/5PBS/25Co
(the formulation with the highest Co content) films reached 6 and
4% disintegration, respectively. The disintegration of the PBS phase
is essentially due to the hydrolysis of the amorphous regions, where
the attack of microorganisms and fungi present in the soil on the
film surface is facilitated.[37,38] The reduced disintegration
value for Co, despite its higher amorphous fraction (i.e., lower crystallinity
degree), can be explained on the basis of the lower amount in the
Co backbone of hydrolysable −COOR– groups per chain
unit, as a consequence of the replacement in the copolymer of 18 mol
% succinic moieties with the long Pripol one. The preferential attack
by the microorganisms of the −COOR– groups mainly present
in the BS segments determines an increase of the BPripol sequence
molar fraction, up to 20% with respect to the initial value, in the
partially degraded ternary blends. The enrichment of degraded samples
in BPripol sequences is in line with a previous study.[28] Consequently, in TPWF/PBS-based formulations,
the disintegrability values decrease with increasing amount of Co.
After 90 days, TPWF, PBS, 70TPWF/30PBS, and 70TPWF/25PBS/5Co disintegrated
(reaching disintegrability values close to 90%). At the end of the
test, at 90 days of incubation in composting conditions, the Co neat
film reached 58% disintegrability, while the ternary blends in which
the Co amount is progressively increased, 70TPWF/20PBS/10Co, 70TPWF/15PBS/15Co,
70TPWF/10PBS/20Co, and 70TPWF/5PBS/25Co, reached 87, 85, 76, and 62%
disintegration, respectively.
Morphological
Analysis of Disintegrated Samples
The surface morphology
of the partially degraded films was determined
via FESEM observations (see Figure ). At time 0, the neat Co film showed a homogeneous
and smooth surface, without the presence of pores or cracks, as already
described in the case of plasticized flours.[39] As reported in the literature, poor miscibility is reported between
PBS and thermoplastic starch,[40] so in our
case, the increasing amount of Co (up to 15 wt %) was indeed beneficial
for the formation of a matrix-dispersed phase type in TPWF/PBS blends.
Nevertheless, at higher amounts, the Co addition produced the appearance
of small surface asperities that probably came from not-perfectly
plasticized granules.[26,41]
Figure 11
FESEM images of Co and TPWF-based film
surfaces before and after
different times (21, 56, and 90 days) in composting conditions.
FESEM images of Co and pan class="Chemical">TPWF-based film
surfaces before and after
different times (21, 56, and 90 days) in composting conditions.
After 21 and 56 days of disintegration in composting
conditions,
in the case of 70TPWF/25PBS/5Co and 70TPWF/20PBS/10Co samples, the
surface showed large smooth areas containing holes with quite sharp
boundaries, coming from the fast degrading TPWF majority phase in
the presence of slow degrading PBS. The holes arose and became increasingly
deeper with increasing erosion time, up to the end of the test at
90 days, where evident porosity connected the holes.[42] The delay of disintegration time in the presence of higher
amounts of Co (from 15 to 25 wt %) was also evident by the loss in
porosity detected for 70TPWF/15PBS/15Co, 70TPWF/10PBS/20Co, and 70TPWF/5PBS/25Co,
which substantially maintained a relatively smooth surface (only a
few holes and cracks appeared), in line with the disintegration profile
of neat Co.[43] These results were in good
agreement with weight loss experiments, which proved the expected
slower disintegration of TPWF/PBS blends after the addition of Co.
Water Contact Angles of TPWF-Based Formulations
Results of water contact angle (WCA) measurement for TPWF/PBS samples
are reported in Table . We measured a mean value of 55° for neat TPWF, confirming
its inherent hydrophilic behavior, as already observed by Averous
et al.[44] and Mahieu et al.,[45] who found values ranging from 32 to 53 °C
for wheat starch films formulated with varying amounts of water/glycerol
ratio. From WCA analysis, it can be shown the high hydrophobic character
of the PBS homopolymer in comparison with the TPWF, as expected on
the basis of their chemical structure. In the case of Co, the introduction
of the large nonpolar Pripol moiety in the repeating unit further
increases the material hydrophobicity, increasing the angle value
from 59 (for neat PBS) to 63°.
Table 6
Water Contact Angles
of the TPWF-Based
Films
WCA (°)
TPWF
54.7 ± 1.4
PBS
58.9 ± 1.9
Co
63.5 ± 0.8
70TPWF/30PBS
60.6 ± 1.2
70TPWF/25PBS/5Co
79.2 ± 1.6
70TPWF/20PBS/10Co
79.9 ± 1.9
70TPWF/15PBS/15Co
72.3 ± 0.8
70TPWF/10PBS/20Co
76.9 ± 1.7
70TPWF/5PBS/25Co
70.4 ± 1.9
As far as the WCA values
for TPWF-based blends are concerned, the
measured values show an alternating trend with the amount of Co present
in the mixture, which can be explained on the basis of two different
effects, acting sometimes in opposition: (i) the amount of the most
hydrophobic component Co and (ii) the rheological characteristics
of the blends since rheology of polymers in the molten state influences
the solidification dynamics and therefore the morphology of the films
produced by cast extrusion. In fact, as known, film processing affects
the morphology of the sample and, consequently, the observed value
of contact angle.[46] Indeed, the surface
roughness degree influences the contact angle value according to the
characteristics of the asperities in terms of quantity and size.[47] As a consequence, the measured WCA value is
the result of all the abovementioned factors, and if they act in opposition,
it will be determined by the prevailing one.The 70TPWF/30PBS
system shows a contact angle of 60°, similar
to PBS, which can be explained by taking into account that, at the
high temperature of the processing, the PBS present in the blend produces
a polymer melt containing well dispersed TPWF starch particles (see Figure ) with consequent
formation, as the sample is cooled down, of a crystalline phase similar
to neat PBS and characterized by a smooth surface. The addition of
small quantities of copolymer in the formulations 70TPWF/25PBS/5Co
and 70TPWF/20PBS/10Co produces a significant increase (values up to
79–80°) of the contact angle, essentially due to both
intrinsic higher hydrophobicity of the Co and the increased surface
roughness, correlated to the ability of Co to bind with starchy particles
of the plasticized flour, causing an increased presence of conglomerates.
The increment in roughness caused by starchy conglomerates in these
ternary systems is appreciable from SEM micrographs of both the surface
(Figure , time 0)
and cross section of the films (Figure ). The Wenzel model forecasts indeed that the surface
roughness amplifies the wettability of the original surface, with
the hydrophilic ones becoming more hydrophilic and the hydrophobic
surface becoming more hydrophobic.[48] It
is worthy to mention that the plasticizing action of the copolymer
does not correspond to a proper compatibilizer effect due to the low
presence of Co in these formulations. When the content of Co is increased
to 15 wt % (70TPWF/15PBS/15Co), the compatibilizer effect of the copolymer
becomes visible, as evidenced by the reduction in size of starchy
conglomerates in the TPWF (see Figure ). The resulting surface morphology is characterized
by rounded asperities, which is determined by a decrease in the contact
angle value, which results in close to 72°, despite the increased
amount in the blend of the most hydrophobic component (Co). In the
70TPWF/10PBS/20Co blend, the dimensional reduction of the conglomerates
and the better dispersion of the starchy particles create a surface
with few rounded asperities, to which many small asperities of the
“deconglomerated” particles overlap (see Figure , time 0); this singular morphology,
together with a concomitant increase of the amount of hydrophobic
component (Co), causes an increase in the contact angle up to 77°.
In the 70TPWF/5PBS/25Co blend, the contact angle drops again to 70°
because of the presence of the highest quantity of Co, which, as previously
described, favors the dispersion and the plasticization of the starchy
particles, with consequent formation of a smooth surface, due to a
uniform and almost free section of discrete conglomerates. The relationships
highlighted among the contact angle and morphology of surfaces and
sections are confirmed by the results of mechanical tensile tests.
The ternary systems show a progressive decrease in the Young’s
modulus, which corresponds to the increase of strain (at maximum stress)
as the quantity of copolymer increases. This trend is in line with
the considerations on morphology and with the expected results. The
trend of maximum stress, although decreasing as the amount of Co in
the mixture increases, shows a relative maximum for 70TPWF/15PBS/20Co,
which indeed shows a good dispersion and compatibilization of the
small starch particles that work as reinforcement, improving the strength.
The excessive plasticization of the same particles for 70TPWF/5PBS/25Co
prevents their reinforcement function by lowering the mechanical strength.
Conclusions
The shift from a linear pan class="Gene">economy,
which produces large quantities
of plastic waste with consequent severe environmenpan class="Chemical">tal problems, to
a circular one cannot disregard the replacement of the fossil-based
and not biodegradable traditional plastics with bioplastics. To date,
the latter is facing serious problems of success in the market, mainly
due to their costs being decidedly higher than those of traditional
plastics.
The results obtained in this work represent a step
forward to the
affirmation of bioplastics on the market. We indeed propose a new
low-cost bioplastic, prepared through a simple, cost-effective, and
eco-friendly technological process. The new material is a ternary
blend formed by the cheap plasticized wheat flour, which represents
the main component (70 wt %), and by varying amounts of two synthetic
polyesters: poly(butylene succinate), which is 100% biobased, compostable,
and with mechanical properties similar to LDPE, and a random PBS-based
copolymer, containing six-C aliphatic ring moieties, also completely
obtainable from renewable resources.In the ternary blends,
the PBS-based copolymer plays an efficient
compatibilizer role, as proven by the more than satisfactory final
mechanical performances, without compromising the characteristic compostability
of wheat flour. In particular, the results obtained evidence that
the blends with 15 and 20 wt% copolymers are the best solution, being
characterized by a significant improvement in film deformation while
keeping good values of both elastic modulus and stress.Last
but not the least, it is interesting to note that, by acting
on the PBS/copolymer ratio, it is also possible to modulate the compostability
rate of the final material and the mechanical performances.