| Literature DB >> 35267848 |
Mario Iván Peñas1,2, Ricardo Arpad Pérez-Camargo3, Rebeca Hernández1, Alejandro J Müller2,4.
Abstract
The impact of plastics on the environment can be mitigated by employing biobased and/or biodegradable materials (i.e., bioplastics) instead of the traditional "commodities". In this context, poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) emerges as one of the most promising alternatives due to its good mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties, making it suitable for use in a wide range of applications. Still, the PBS has some drawbacks, such as its high crystallinity, which must be overcome to position it as a real and viable alternative to "commodities". This contribution covers the actual state-of-the-art of the PBS through different sections. The first section reviews the different synthesis routes, providing a complete picture regarding the obtained molecular weights and the greener alternatives. Afterward, we examine how different strategies such as random copolymerization and the incorporation of fillers can effectively modulate PBS properties to satisfy the needs for different applications. The impact of these strategies is evaluated in the crystallization behavior, crystallinity, mechanical and barrier properties, and biodegradation. The biodegradation is carefully analyzed, highlighting the wide variety of methodologies existing in the literature to measure PBS degradation through different routes (hydrolytic, enzymatic, and soil).Entities:
Keywords: barrier properties; biocomposites; copolymerization; crystallization; degradation; mechanical properties; poly (butylene succinate)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35267848 PMCID: PMC8914744 DOI: 10.3390/polym14051025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Scheme 1Transesterification polymerization of PBS: (a) transesterification step; (b) direct polymerization step; (c) polycondensation step.
Figure 1Chemical structures of 9 different catalysts employed in the transesterification step: (a) titanium (IV) butoxide (TNBT) and (b) titanium (IV) isopropoxide (TTIP).
Scheme 2Chain-extension step with hexamethylene diisocyanate (HMDI) to produce high-MW PBS.
Scheme 3Enzymatic synthesis of PBS by the employment of CALB.
Figure 2Variation of the weight average molecular weight (Mw) with PBS composition. The different comonomers are indicated in the legend. The green area corresponds to low-Mw copolymers (obtained by enzymatic synthesis), the blue covers intermediate-Mw copolymers, and the orange region indicates high-Mw copolymers.
Figure 3Variation of the melting temperature as a function of the PBS composition for selected copolyesters. Pseudo-eutectic points can be observed in the shaded region.
Figure 4Variation of the degree of crystallinity as a function of the PBS composition for selected copolyesters. Pseudo-eutectic points can be observed in the shaded region.
Figure 5(a) Variation of the normalized elastic moduli (E) with PBS composition for different copolymers and (b) variation of the normalized elongation at break (ε) with PBS composition for different copolymers. For a better comparison, the values have been normalized to those of neat PBS. Dashed colored vertical lines reflect a minimum in the elastic moduli, in agreement with the composition of the pseudo-eutectic point observed in the T vs. the composition graph (Figure 3).
Figure 6Variation of the elastic moduli (E) and elongation at break (ε) with filler content. For a better comparison, both parameters have been normalized to that of neat PBS. The dashed black line corresponds to a “critical” filler content.
Figure 7Gas barrier properties (O2P and CO2P) for several commercial polymers and biopolymers: (a) bar chart for a general overview and (b) plot for intermediate permeabilities (PBS region). Note that both axes are presented in decimal logarithm form. Data taken from [97,101,103,105,106,109,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122].
Classification of enzymes by families for different PBS enzymatic degradation studies.
| Family | Enzyme | Substrate | Experimental Conditions | Results | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cutinase |
| PBS films 30 × 10 × 0.1 mm3 | pH = 8.0 at 40 °C, 20 µg/mL | 100% weight loss in 6 h | [ |
| Cutinase |
| PBS films 30 × 10 × 0.5 mm3 | pH = 7.4 at 37 °C, 0.15 mg/mL | 100% weight loss in 12 h | [ |
| Cutinase |
| PBS films 30 × 10 × 0.1 mm3 | pH = 7.4 at 37 °C, 10 mg/mL | 98.4% weight loss in 12 h | [ |
| Cutinase |
| PBS films 30 × 10 × 0.5 mm3 | pH = 7.2 at 37 °C, 18 U/mL | ~100% weight loss in 26 h | [ |
| Lipase | PBS films 30 × 10 × 0.5 mm3 | pH = 7.2 at 45 °C, 18 U/mL | 95.1% weight loss in 26 h | [ | |
| Lipase |
| PBS films 10 × 10 × 0.5 mm3 | pH = 7.4 at 30 °C, 0.1 mg/mL | 2% weight loss after 7 weeks | [ |
| Lipase |
| PBS films 20 × 30 × 0.3 mm3 | pH = 8.0 at 40 °C, 0.06 mg/mL | 2% weight loss after 90 h | [ |
| Lipase | PBS films 30 × 10 mm2 | pH = 7.4 at 37 °C, 1.2 mg/mL | 1.8% weight loss after 90 h | [ | |
| Lipase | Porcine pancreas | PBS films 30 × 10 mm2 | pH = 7.4 at 37 °C, 0.8 mg/mL | 0.9% weight loss after 90 h | [ |
| Lipase |
| PBS films 10 × 10 × 0.1 mm3 | pH = 6.86 at 45 °C, 0.22 mg/mL | 4.6% weight loss after 50 h | [ |
| Lipase | Porcine pancreas | PBS film discs 10 × 10 × 0.2 mm3 | pH = 7.4 at 37 °C, 1 mg/mL | 21% weight loss after 30 days | [ |
| Lipase |
| PBS films 10 × 10 × 0.2 mm3 | pH = 7.3 at 37 °C, 2 mg/mL | No visible degradation after 300 h | [ |
| Lipase |
| PBS films 10 × 10 × 0.1 mm3 | pH = 6.86 at 45 °C, 0.53 mg/mL | 100% weight loss after 288 h | [ |
| Lipase |
| PBS film discs 20 × 20 × 0.05 mm3 | pH = 7.4 at 37 °C, 1 mg/mL | 6% weight loss after 50 h | [ |
| Lipase | PBS film discs 50 × 50 × 2 mm3 | pH = 7.2 at 30 °C, 0.09 & 0.01 mg/mL | 2% weight loss after 360 h | [ |
Figure 8Weight loss curves corresponding to various enzymatic degradation studies of PBS by the action of a lipase from Pseudomonas cepacia. Experimental conditions differ from one study to another, although the same enzyme is used.
Different biodegradation studies of PBS and PBS biocomposites carried out in environmental conditions.
| Filler | Filler Content | Experimental Conditions | Results (Weight Loss) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubberwood powders (RWP) | 0–40 wt% | 60 days, no UV radiation, water control each 48 h | <1% (PBS) | [ |
| Rice husk flour (RHF) and wood flour (WF) | 0–40 wt% | 4 months | 7% (PBS) | [ |
| Sugarcane rind fiber (SRF) | 0–15 wt% | 100 days, natural soil in cropland, water control each 24 h | 2.5% (PBS) | [ |
| Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) | 0–40 wt% | 75 days, simulated compost, 58 °C, pH = 5.7–6.3, 50 wt% water content | 100% in 75–80 days (PBS) | [ |
| Cotton fiber (CF) | 0–40 wt% | Based on ISO 14855-2 | ~60% (PBS) | [ |
| Rice husk flour (RHF) | 0–40 wt% | Based on ASTM D 6003-96 | ~12% (PBS) | [ |
| Jute fiber (JF) | 0–30 wt% | 180 days, compost soil, 30 °C, constant water control | 31.4% (PBS) | [ |
| Abaca fiber (AF) | 10 wt% | 180 days, black soil and leaf mold for gardening, 25–30 °C, water control each 48 h | ~30% (PBS) | [ |
| Soy, canola, and corn gluten meals (SM, CM, CGM) and switchgrass (SG) | 25 wt% | Based on ASTM D6400 | ~95% (PBS) | [ |
| Organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT) | 0–10 wt% | 180 days, natural compost, 30 °C, pH = 7.46, 60–70 wt% water content | ~9% (PBS) | [ |
| Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and recycled cellulose (rCell) | 0–15 wt% (PBS/NFC) | 80 days, 58 °C, pH = 5.7–6.5, >50 wt% water content | ~80% (PBS) | [ |
| Pistachio shell flour (PSF) | 0–30 wt% | Based on ISO 20200 | ~18% (PBS) | [ |
Figure 9Biodegradation in environmental conditions for several PBS/cellulose-based biocomposites: influence of filler content in weight loss for (a) PBS/MCC composites, (b) PBS/NFC composites, and (c) PBS/rCell composites; (d) variation of biodegradation rates for PBS and the three PBS/cellulose-based biocomposites. In Figure 9a–c, weight losses at 20, 40, and 60 days are represented.