Literature DB >> 3258026

Validation of PET-acquired input functions for cardiac studies.

I N Weinberg1, S C Huang, E J Hoffman, L Araujo, C Nienaber, M Grover-McKay, M Dahlbom, H Schelbert.   

Abstract

To validate the determination of the arterial input function by noninvasive dynamic PET imaging, measurements of blood-pool activity in canine LV by PET were compared to beta probe measurements of arterial blood withdrawn directly from the LV. PET scans were done during intravenous bolus injections of [13N]ammonia or 82Rb, while the activity of blood withdrawn continuously from a catheter inserted in the LV was measured with a beta probe. PET determinations of LV blood-pool activity were compared with dispersion-corrected beta probe time-activity curves. In 15 experiments involving four dogs under a wide range of physiologic conditions, LV time-activity curves obtained with PET matched well in shape with those obtained with the beta probe. Linear regression yielded slopes within 10% of unity (95% confidence interval) and high correlation (r greater than 0.968, p less than 0.001). We conclude that noninvasive measurement of the arterial input function by dynamic PET imaging is valid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3258026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  28 in total

1.  Left atrial versus left ventricular input function for quantification of the myocardial blood flow with nitrogen-13 ammonia and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Jens D Hove; Hidehiro Iida; Klaus F Kofoed; Jacob Freiberg; Søren Holm; Henning Kelbaek
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve: Technical aspects.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Role of PET in the evaluation and understanding of coronary physiology.

Authors:  Thomas H Schindler; Xiao-Li Zhang; Gabriella Vincenti; Leila Mhiri; René Lerch; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  EEC concerted action on cellular degeneration and regeneration studied with PET. Modelling expert meeting blood flow measurement with PET--Orsay, 12-13 October 1989.

Authors:  A A Lammertsma; B M Mazoyer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

Review 5.  What is the current status of quantification and nuclear medicine in cardiology?

Authors:  G Hör
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-07

6.  Modeling regional myocardial flows from residue functions of an intravascular indicator.

Authors:  K Kroll; N Wilke; M Jerosch-Herold; Y Wang; Y Zhang; R J Bache; J B Bassingthwaighte
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1996-10

Review 7.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  A method for generating image-derived input function in quantitative 18F-FDG PET study based on the monotonicity of the input and output function curve.

Authors:  Shan Zhou; Kewei Chen; Eric M Reiman; De-min Li; Baoci Shan
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.690

9.  Factors affecting myocardial 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake in positron emission tomography studies of normal humans.

Authors:  Y Choi; R C Brunken; R A Hawkins; S C Huang; D B Buxton; C K Hoh; M E Phelps; H R Schelbert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-04

10.  Metabolism of nitrogen-13 labelled ammonia in different conditions in dogs, human volunteers and transplant patients.

Authors:  G Bormans; A Maes; W Langendries; J Nuyts; M Vrolix; J Vanhaecke; C Schiepers; M De Roo; L Mortelmans; A Verbruggen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.