Spyridon Bakas1,2,3, Gaurav Shukla1,4, Hamed Akbari1,2, Guray Erus1,2, Aristeidis Sotiras1,2,5,6, Saima Rathore1,2, Chiharu Sako1,2, Sung Min Ha1,2, Martin Rozycki1,2, Russell T Shinohara1,7, Michel Bilello1,2, Christos Davatzikos1,2. 1. University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA, United States. 2. University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, United States. 3. University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Richards Medical Research Laboratories, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States. 4. Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, United States. 5. Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, Institute for Informatics, Saint Louis, MO, United States. 6. Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Radiology, Saint Louis, MO, United States. 7. University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: Glioblastoma, the most common and aggressive adult brain tumor, is considered noncurative at diagnosis, with 14 to 16 months median survival following treatment. There is increasing evidence that noninvasive integrative analysis of radiomic features can predict overall and progression-free survival, using advanced multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (Adv-mpMRI). If successfully applicable, such noninvasive markers can considerably influence patient management. However, most patients prior to initiation of therapy typically undergo only basic structural mpMRI (Bas-mpMRI, i.e., T1, T1-Gd, T2, and T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) preoperatively, rather than Adv-mpMRI that provides additional vascularization (dynamic susceptibility contrast-MRI) and cell-density (diffusion tensor imaging) related information. Approach: We assess a retrospective cohort of 101 glioblastoma patients with available Adv-mpMRI from a previous study, which has shown that an initial feature panel (IFP, i.e., intensity, volume, location, and growth model parameters) extracted from Adv-mpMRI can yield accurate overall survival stratification. We focus on demonstrating that equally accurate prediction models can be constructed using augmented radiomic feature panels (ARFPs, i.e., integrating morphology and textural descriptors) extracted solely from widely available Bas-mpMRI, obviating the need for using Adv-mpMRI. We extracted 1612 radiomic features from distinct tumor subregions to build multivariate models that stratified patients as long-, intermediate-, or short-survivors. Results: The classification accuracy of the model utilizing Adv-mpMRI protocols and the IFP was 72.77% and degraded to 60.89% when using only Bas-mpMRI. However, utilizing the ARFP on Bas-mpMRI improved the accuracy to 74.26%. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated superior classification of subjects into short-, intermediate-, and long-survivor classes when using ARFP extracted from Bas-mpMRI. Conclusions: This quantitative evaluation indicates that accurate survival prediction in glioblastoma patients is feasible using solely Bas-mpMRI and integrative advanced radiomic features, which can compensate for the lack of Adv-mpMRI. Our finding holds promise for generalization across multiple institutions that may not have access to Adv-mpMRI and to better inform clinical decision-making about aggressive interventions and clinical trials.
Purpose: Glioblastoma, the most common and aggressive adult brain tumor, is considered noncurative at diagnosis, with 14 to 16 months median survival following treatment. There is increasing evidence that noninvasive integrative analysis of radiomic features can predict overall and progression-free survival, using advanced multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (Adv-mpMRI). If successfully applicable, such noninvasive markers can considerably influence patient management. However, most patients prior to initiation of therapy typically undergo only basic structural mpMRI (Bas-mpMRI, i.e., T1, T1-Gd, T2, and T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) preoperatively, rather than Adv-mpMRI that provides additional vascularization (dynamic susceptibility contrast-MRI) and cell-density (diffusion tensor imaging) related information. Approach: We assess a retrospective cohort of 101 glioblastomapatients with available Adv-mpMRI from a previous study, which has shown that an initial feature panel (IFP, i.e., intensity, volume, location, and growth model parameters) extracted from Adv-mpMRI can yield accurate overall survival stratification. We focus on demonstrating that equally accurate prediction models can be constructed using augmented radiomic feature panels (ARFPs, i.e., integrating morphology and textural descriptors) extracted solely from widely available Bas-mpMRI, obviating the need for using Adv-mpMRI. We extracted 1612 radiomic features from distinct tumor subregions to build multivariate models that stratified patients as long-, intermediate-, or short-survivors. Results: The classification accuracy of the model utilizing Adv-mpMRI protocols and the IFP was 72.77% and degraded to 60.89% when using only Bas-mpMRI. However, utilizing the ARFP on Bas-mpMRI improved the accuracy to 74.26%. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated superior classification of subjects into short-, intermediate-, and long-survivor classes when using ARFP extracted from Bas-mpMRI. Conclusions: This quantitative evaluation indicates that accurate survival prediction in glioblastomapatients is feasible using solely Bas-mpMRI and integrative advanced radiomic features, which can compensate for the lack of Adv-mpMRI. Our finding holds promise for generalization across multiple institutions that may not have access to Adv-mpMRI and to better inform clinical decision-making about aggressive interventions and clinical trials.
Authors: Brian J Gill; David J Pisapia; Hani R Malone; Hannah Goldstein; Liang Lei; Adam Sonabend; Jonathan Yun; Jorge Samanamud; Jennifer S Sims; Matei Banu; Athanassios Dovas; Andrew F Teich; Sameer A Sheth; Guy M McKhann; Michael B Sisti; Jeffrey N Bruce; Peter A Sims; Peter Canoll Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Arevalo-Perez; A A Thomas; T Kaley; J Lyo; K K Peck; A I Holodny; I K Mellinghoff; W Shi; Z Zhang; R J Young Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Hamed Akbari; Luke Macyszyn; Xiao Da; Michel Bilello; Ronald L Wolf; Maria Martinez-Lage; George Biros; Michelle Alonso-Basanta; Donald M OʼRourke; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Bjoern H Menze; Andras Jakab; Stefan Bauer; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani; Justin Kirby; Yuliya Burren; Nicole Porz; Johannes Slotboom; Roland Wiest; Levente Lanczi; Elizabeth Gerstner; Marc-André Weber; Tal Arbel; Brian B Avants; Nicholas Ayache; Patricia Buendia; D Louis Collins; Nicolas Cordier; Jason J Corso; Antonio Criminisi; Tilak Das; Hervé Delingette; Çağatay Demiralp; Christopher R Durst; Michel Dojat; Senan Doyle; Joana Festa; Florence Forbes; Ezequiel Geremia; Ben Glocker; Polina Golland; Xiaotao Guo; Andac Hamamci; Khan M Iftekharuddin; Raj Jena; Nigel M John; Ender Konukoglu; Danial Lashkari; José Antonió Mariz; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Doina Precup; Stephen J Price; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Syed M S Reza; Michael Ryan; Duygu Sarikaya; Lawrence Schwartz; Hoo-Chang Shin; Jamie Shotton; Carlos A Silva; Nuno Sousa; Nagesh K Subbanna; Gabor Szekely; Thomas J Taylor; Owen M Thomas; Nicholas J Tustison; Gozde Unal; Flor Vasseur; Max Wintermark; Dong Hye Ye; Liang Zhao; Binsheng Zhao; Darko Zikic; Marcel Prastawa; Mauricio Reyes; Koen Van Leemput Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Raphael Meier; William D Dunn; Brian Alexander; Roland Wiest; Stefan Bauer; David A Gutman; Mauricio Reyes; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sarthak Pati; Ruchika Verma; Hamed Akbari; Michel Bilello; Virginia B Hill; Chiharu Sako; Ramon Correa; Niha Beig; Ludovic Venet; Siddhesh Thakur; Prashant Serai; Sung Min Ha; Geri D Blake; Russell Taki Shinohara; Pallavi Tiwari; Spyridon Bakas Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 4.071