Literature DB >> 27541161

The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine: A Review.

Hugo J W L Aerts1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Advances in genomics have led to the recognition that tumors are populated by distinct genotypic subgroups that drive tumor development and progression. The spatial and temporal heterogeneity of solid tumors has been a critical barrier to the development of precision medicine approaches because the standard approach to tumor sampling, often invasive needle biopsy, is unable to fully capture the spatial state of the tumor. Image-based phenotyping, which represents quantification of the tumor phenotype through medical imaging, is a promising development for precision medicine. OBSERVATIONS: Medical imaging can provide a comprehensive macroscopic picture of the tumor phenotype and its environment that is ideally suited to quantifying the development of the tumor phenotype before, during, and after treatment. As a noninvasive technique, medical imaging can be performed at low risk and inconvenience to the patient. The semantic features approach to tumor phenotyping, accomplished by visual assessment of radiologists, is compared with a computational radiomic approach that relies on automated processing of imaging assays. Together, these approaches capture important information for diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive purposes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although imaging technology is already embedded in clinical practice for diagnosis, staging, treatment planning, and response assessment, the transition of these computational methods to the clinic has been surprisingly slow. This review outlines the promise of these novel technologies for precision medicine and the obstacles to clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27541161     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  178 in total

Review 1.  Image-based biomarkers for solid tumor quantification.

Authors:  Peter Savadjiev; Jaron Chong; Anthony Dohan; Vincent Agnus; Reza Forghani; Caroline Reinhold; Benoit Gallix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Brain Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (brain-CaPTk): An Interactive Platform for Quantitative Analysis of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Saima Rathore; Spyridon Bakas; Sarthak Pati; Hamed Akbari; Ratheesh Kalarot; Patmaa Sridharan; Martin Rozycki; Mark Bergman; Birkan Tunc; Ragini Verma; Michel Bilello; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2018-02-17

3.  CT imaging markers to improve radiation toxicity prediction in prostate cancer radiotherapy by stacking regression algorithm.

Authors:  Shayan Mostafaei; Hamid Abdollahi; Shiva Kazempour Dehkordi; Isaac Shiri; Abolfazl Razzaghdoust; Seyed Hamid Zoljalali Moghaddam; Afshin Saadipoor; Fereshteh Koosha; Susan Cheraghi; Seied Rabi Mahdavi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Towards precision medicine: from quantitative imaging to radiomics.

Authors:  U Rajendra Acharya; Yuki Hagiwara; Vidya K Sudarshan; Wai Yee Chan; Kwan Hoong Ng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Jan.       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  AI-based applications in hybrid imaging: how to build smart and truly multi-parametric decision models for radiomics.

Authors:  Isabella Castiglioni; Francesca Gallivanone; Paolo Soda; Michele Avanzo; Joseph Stancanello; Marco Aiello; Matteo Interlenghi; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Multisite evaluation of radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminability for identifying peripheral zone prostate tumors on MRI.

Authors:  Prathyush Chirra; Patrick Leo; Michael Yim; B Nicolas Bloch; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Andrei Purysko; Mark Rosen; Anant Madabhushi; Satish E Viswanath
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-06-14

7.  The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.

Authors:  Isaac Shiri; Arman Rahmim; Pardis Ghaffarian; Parham Geramifar; Hamid Abdollahi; Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Extracellular Domain Mutations in Glioblastoma Present Opportunities for Clinical Imaging and Therapeutic Development.

Authors:  Zev A Binder; Amy Haseley Thorne; Spyridon Bakas; E Paul Wileyto; Michel Bilello; Hamed Akbari; Saima Rathore; Sung Min Ha; Logan Zhang; Cole J Ferguson; Sonika Dahiya; Wenya Linda Bi; David A Reardon; Ahmed Idbaih; Joerg Felsberg; Bettina Hentschel; Michael Weller; Stephen J Bagley; Jennifer J D Morrissette; MacLean P Nasrallah; Jianhui Ma; Ciro Zanca; Andrew M Scott; Laura Orellana; Christos Davatzikos; Frank B Furnari; Donald M O'Rourke
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 9.  Demystification of AI-driven medical image interpretation: past, present and future.

Authors:  Peter Savadjiev; Jaron Chong; Anthony Dohan; Maria Vakalopoulou; Caroline Reinhold; Nikos Paragios; Benoit Gallix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Somatic Mutations Drive Distinct Imaging Phenotypes in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Chintan Parmar; Ying Liu; Thibaud P Coroller; Gisele Cruz; Olya Stringfield; Zhaoxiang Ye; Mike Makrigiorgos; Fiona Fennessy; Raymond H Mak; Robert Gillies; John Quackenbush; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.