Literature DB >> 12813158

Reflex responses in the lower leg following landing impact on an inverting and non-inverting platform.

C Grüneberg1, P H J A Nieuwenhuijzen, J Duysens.   

Abstract

In the lower leg, landing after a jump induces reflexes, the role of which is not well understood. This is even more so for reflexes following landing on inverting surfaces. The latter condition is of special interest since ankle inversion traumata are one of the most common injuries during sport. Most studies have investigated ankle inversions during a static standing condition. However, ankle injuries occur during more dynamic activities such as jumping. Therefore, the present study aimed at reproducing these situations but in a completely safe setting. EMG responses were recorded after landing on an inverting surface, which caused a mild ankle inversion of 25 deg of rotation (in a range sufficient to elicit reflexes but safe enough to exclude sprains). The results are compared with data from landing on a non-inverting surface to understand the effect of the inversion. In general, landing on the platform resulted in short and long latency responses (SLR and LLR) in triceps surae (soleus, gastrocnemius medialis and lateralis) and peroneal muscles (long and short peroneal) but not in the tibialis anterior muscle. Landing on the inverting platform caused significant LLRs in the peroneal muscles (which underwent the largest stretch) but not in the triceps muscles. Conversely, landing on a non-inverting platform induced larger SLRs in triceps than in the peroneal muscles. Although the peroneal LLRs thus appeared to be selectively recruited in an inverting perturbation, their role during such perturbations should be limited since the latency of these responses was about 90 ms while the inversion lasts only 42 ms. The SLRs, if present, had an onset latency of around 44 ms. In the period following the inversion, however, the responses may be important in preventing further stretch of these muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12813158      PMCID: PMC2343073          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.036244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  36 in total

1.  Muscular responses and movement strategies during stumbling over obstacles.

Authors:  A M Schillings; B M van Wezel; T Mulder; J Duysens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Multiple comparisons: philosophies and illustrations.

Authors:  D Curran-Everett
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Ankle instability caused by prolonged peroneal reaction time.

Authors:  L Konradsen; J B Ravn
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1990-10

4.  The effect of external ankle support in chronic lateral ankle joint instability. An electromyographic study.

Authors:  J Karlsson; G O Andreasson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Mechanical and electromyographic responses to stretch of the human anterior tibial muscle at different levels of contraction.

Authors:  E Toft; T Sinkjaer; S Andreassen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Management and rehabilitation of ligamentous injuries to the ankle.

Authors:  F C Balduini; J J Vegso; J S Torg; E Torg
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Group II muscle afferents probably contribute to the medium latency soleus stretch reflex during walking in humans.

Authors:  M J Grey; M Ladouceur; J B Andersen; J B Nielsen; T Sinkjaer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Selective activation of human soleus or gastrocnemius in reflex responses during walking and running.

Authors:  J Duysens; A A Tax; B van der Doelen; M Trippel; V Dietz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dynamic control of muscle stiffness and H reflex modulation during hopping and jumping in man.

Authors:  P Dyhre-Poulsen; E B Simonsen; M Voigt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Long-latency stretch reflexes as co-ordinated functional responses in man.

Authors:  C C Gielen; L Ramaekers; E J van Zuylen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Effect of sensorimotor training on morphological, neurophysiological and functional characteristics of the ankle: a critical review.

Authors:  Maarten D W Hupperets; Evert A L M Verhagen; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Unloading reaction during sudden ankle inversion in healthy adults.

Authors:  Tarang Kumar Jain; Clayton Wauneka; Wen Liu
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Neuromuscular differences between prepubescents boys and adult men during drop jump.

Authors:  Savvas Lazaridis; Eleni Bassa; Dimitrios Patikas; Giannis Giakas; Albert Gollhofer; Christos Kotzamanidis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis show neuromuscular adaptation when perturbed during walking despite functional and structural impairments.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; Charles Buz Swanik; Darcy S Reisman; Katherine S Rudolph
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2013-09-26

5.  Preparatory co-activation of the ankle muscles may prevent ankle inversion injuries.

Authors:  Matthew S DeMers; Jennifer L Hicks; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Fast muscle responses to an unexpected foot-in-hole scenario, evoked in the context of prior knowledge of the potential perturbation.

Authors:  Masahiro Shinya; Shinya Masahiro; Shingo Oda; Oda Shingo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Misencoding of ankle joint angle control system via cutaneous afferents reflex pathway in chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Genki Futatsubashi; Syusaku Sasada; Hiroyuki Ohtsuka; Shinya Suzuki; Tomoyoshi Komiyama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Ankle bracing, plantar-flexion angle, and ankle muscle latencies during inversion stress in healthy participants.

Authors:  Thomas Kernozek; Christopher J Durall; Allison Friske; Matthew Mussallem
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  How much does the human medial gastrocnemius muscle contribute to ankle torques outside the sagittal plane?

Authors:  Taian M M Vieira; Marco A Minetto; Emma F Hodson-Tole; Alberto Botter
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 10.  Review of ankle inversion sprain simulators in the biomechanics laboratory.

Authors:  Sophia Chui-Wai Ha; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2015-10-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.