Literature DB >> 32565920

Biomechanical evaluation of an independent acromioclavicular ligament repair for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Daniel K Ibrahim1, Patrick H Lam1, Ricardo J Aveledo Anzola1, George Ac Murrell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of surgical techniques for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint separations have been described; however, few have been able to create a strong intra-operative construct that provides minimal joint translation. A biomechanical study was conducted to examine joint translation in an independent acromioclavicular ligament repair.
METHODS: Three variations of a novel independent acromioclavicular ligament repair technique underwent testing using a Sawbones model. The technique involves threading sutures through two acromial bone tunnels in a suture-bridge configuration and anchoring them into the distal clavicle. Three groups of eight specimens underwent reconstruction; group 1 using FiberTape, group 2 using FiberWire and group 3 using FiberTape in a modified (under-over) suture-bridge configuration. Superior, anterior and posterior translation was tested at loads of 10, 20 and 30 N.
RESULTS: Group 3 repair yielded the least translation in both anterior-posterior and superior-inferior planes, with a two-fold decrease in superior translation compared to groups 1 and 2 (P < .05). Both groups 1 and 3 using FiberTape resulted in significantly less anterior and posterior translation compared to the FiberWire group (P < .05). DISCUSSION: The independent acromioclavicular ligament repair, without repair of the coracoclavicular ligament, demonstrated significant translational stability in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior planes.
© 2019 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acromioclavicular joint; biomechanical; dislocation; independent acromioclavicular reconstruction; shoulder

Year:  2019        PMID: 32565920      PMCID: PMC7285976          DOI: 10.1177/1758573219857685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  16 in total

1.  Effect of capsular injury on acromioclavicular joint mechanics.

Authors:  R E Debski; I M Parsons; S L Woo; F H Fu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Joint compression alters the kinematics and loading patterns of the intact and capsule-transected AC joint.

Authors:  Ryan S Costic; Rajesh Jari; Mark W Rodosky; Richard E Debski
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  The acromioclavicular capsule as a restraint to posterior translation of the clavicle: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  J J Klimkiewicz; G R Williams; J S Sher; A Karduna; J Des Jardins; J P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  Current concepts in the surgical management of acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  David Epstein; Michael Day; Andrew Rokito
Journal:  Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2012

5.  Anteroposterior instability of the distal clavicle after distal clavicle resection.

Authors:  P E Blazar; J P Iannotti; G R Williams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The Orientation and Variation of the Acromioclavicular Ligament: An Anatomic Study.

Authors:  Masataka Nakazawa; Akimoto Nimura; Tomoyuki Mochizuki; Masahiro Koizumi; Tatsuo Sato; Keiichi Akita
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Functional evaluation of the ligaments at the acromioclavicular joint during anteroposterior and superoinferior translation.

Authors:  K W Lee; R E Debski; C H Chen; S L Woo; F H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Arthroscopic Stabilization of Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: Triple- Versus Single-Bundle Reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark Tauber; Dennis Valler; Sven Lichtenberg; Petra Magosch; Philipp Moroder; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using the LockDown synthetic implant: a study with cadavers.

Authors:  R Taranu; P R P Rushton; I Serrano-Pedraza; L Holder; W A Wallace; J J Candal-Couto
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Complication rates and types of failure after arthroscopic acute acromioclavicular dislocation fixation. Prospective multicenter study of 116 cases.

Authors:  P Clavert; A Meyer; P Boyer; O Gastaud; J Barth; F Duparc
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.