Literature DB >> 26545944

Complication rates and types of failure after arthroscopic acute acromioclavicular dislocation fixation. Prospective multicenter study of 116 cases.

P Clavert1, A Meyer2, P Boyer3, O Gastaud4, J Barth5, F Duparc6.   

Abstract

AIMS: To report and analyze both the surgical and radiographic complications associated with anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) ligament procedures and to evaluate the effect of these complications on patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2012 to July 2013, 116 primary anatomic CC ligament procedures (all arthroscopic endobutton fixations) were performed in 14 different centers. Demographic, surgical, subjective, and radiographic data were prospectively analyzed in 14 centers with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.
RESULTS: This series included 96 men and 20 women, mean age 37 years old, with a mean delay to surgery of 10 days. No intraoperative complications were reported. There were 11 complications due to hardware failure resulting in a loss of reduction, 1 coracoid fracture, 7 cases of adhesive capsulitis, 2 local infections, 5 cases of hardware pain. There were significant differences in outcomes between patients who did and did not develop complications: mean CS=71 vs. 93, (P<0.0001). All the parameters of the CS were statistically affected (P<0.0001). Forty-eight patients had persistent dislocation>150% on an AP X-ray which affected the pain and activity CS (P=0.023 and P=0.044). No preoperative predictive factors were identified. These patients could not return to the same level of sports activities due to persistent pain. DISCUSSION: Anatomic procedures to treat AC joint dislocation using CC ligament reconstruction resulted in an overall complication rate of 22.4% and influenced the return to sports. Good to excellent outcomes were reported in patients without complications. CLINICAL SERIES: Level of evidence 4.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular joint; Arthroscopy; Complication; Failure; Shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26545944     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  28 in total

1.  Radiographic features and complications following coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian P Kennedy; Zehava Sadka Rosenberg; Michael J Alaia; Mohammad Samim; Erin F Alaia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Comparison of two methods for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Emre Çalışal; Levent Uğur
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.511

3.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a Dog Bone button fixation alone versus Dog Bone button fixation augmented with acromioclavicular repair-a finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Sermsak Sumanont; Supachoke Nopamassiri; Artit Boonrod; Punyawat Apiwatanakul; Arunnit Boonrod; Chanakarn Phornphutkul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 4.  Shoulder acromioclavicular joint reconstruction options and outcomes.

Authors:  Simon Lee; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

5.  Arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization leads to significant clavicular tunnel widening in the early post-operative period.

Authors:  Siva Thangaraju; Serdar Cepni; Petra Magosch; Mark Tauber; Peter Habermeyer; Frank Martetschläger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using Knotless Coracoclavicular Fixation and Soft-Tissue Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Travis J Menge; Dimitri S Tahal; J Christoph Katthagen; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-01-09

7.  Clavicle and coracoid process periprosthetic fractures as late post-operative complications in arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization.

Authors:  Siva Thangaraju; Mark Tauber; Peter Habermeyer; Frank Martetschläger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The importance of biomechanical properties in revision acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a scoping review.

Authors:  Felix Dyrna; Daniel P Berthold; Matthias J Feucht; Lukas N Muench; Frank Martetschläger; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Percutaneous endobutton fixation of acute acromioclavicular joint injuries and lateral clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Ruben Manohara; Jeffrey Todd Reid
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-10-21

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of an independent acromioclavicular ligament repair for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel K Ibrahim; Patrick H Lam; Ricardo J Aveledo Anzola; George Ac Murrell
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.