Literature DB >> 11568197

Effect of capsular injury on acromioclavicular joint mechanics.

R E Debski1, I M Parsons, S L Woo, F H Fu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic disruption of the acromioclavicular joint capsule is associated with pain and instability after the injury and may lead to degenerative joint disease. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of transection of the acromioclavicular joint capsule on the kinematics and the in situ forces in the coracoclavicular ligaments in response to external loading conditions.
METHODS: Eleven fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were tested with use of a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The shoulders were subjected to three loading conditions (an anterior, posterior, and superior load of 70 N) in their intact state and after transection of the acromioclavicular joint capsule.
RESULTS: Transection of the capsule resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) increase in anterior translation (6.4 mm) and posterior translation (3.6 mm) but not in superior translation (1.6 mm). The effect of capsule transection on the forces in the coracoclavicular ligaments was also significant (p < 0.05) in response to anterior and posterior loading but not in response to superior loading. However, differences were found between the forces in the trapezoid and conoid ligaments. Under an anterior load, the mean in situ force (and standard deviation) in the trapezoid increased from 14 +/- 14 N to 25 +/- 19 N, while the mean force in the conoid increased from 15 +/- 14 N to 49 +/- 23 N, or 227%. In contrast, in response to a posterior load, the mean in situ force in the trapezoid increased from 23 +/- 15 N to 38 +/- 23 N, or 66% (p < 0.05), while the mean force in the conoid increased only 9%. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The large differences in the change of force in the conoid and trapezoid ligaments suggest that these ligaments should not be considered as one structure when surgical treatment is considered. Furthermore, transection of the capsule resulted in a shift of load to the coracoclavicular ligaments, which may render the intact coracoclavicular ligaments more likely to fail with anterior or posterior loading. The results of the present study also suggest that the intact coracoclavicular ligaments cannot compensate for the loss of capsular function during anterior-posterior loading as occurs in type-II acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11568197     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200109000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  50 in total

1.  Biomechanical properties of repairs for dislocated AC joints using suture button systems with integrated tendon augmentation.

Authors:  Knut Beitzel; Elifho Obopilwe; David M Chowaniec; Michael D Nowak; Bryan T Hanypsiak; James J Guerra; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The coracoclavicular ligaments: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Katsumi Takase
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  [Arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; N Kraus; S Greiner; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Minimally invasive endoscopic reconstruction technique of acute AC-joint dislocations: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Michael Osti; Romain Seil; Felix Bachelier; Dieter Kohn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Jan P Kempka; Steffen Schanz; Thore Zantop; Hazibullah Waizy; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Biomechanics of a new technique for minimal-invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Simon Lenschow; Peter Schürmann; Mike Schroeglmann; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Kösters; Michael J Raschke
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [Epidemiology, anatomy, biomechanics and imaging of acromioclavicular joint injuries].

Authors:  M Wellmann; T Smith
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Pierorazio Motta; Laura Bruno; Alberto Maderni; Piermario Tosco; Umberto Mariotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Tim Saier; Arne J Venjakob; Philipp Minzlaff; Peter Föhr; Filip Lindell; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt; Sepp Braun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  [Diseases of the acromioclavicular joint].

Authors:  M Tauber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.