Literature DB >> 12706008

Joint compression alters the kinematics and loading patterns of the intact and capsule-transected AC joint.

Ryan S Costic1, Rajesh Jari, Mark W Rodosky, Richard E Debski.   

Abstract

High compressive loads are transmitted through the shoulder across the acromioclavicular (AC) joint to the axial skeleton during activities of daily living and can lead to early joint degeneration or instability. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of joint compression on the biomechanics of the intact and capsule-transected AC joint during application of three loading conditions. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was utilized to apply an anterior, posterior or superior load of 70 N in combination with 10 or 70 N of joint compression to fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (n=12). The application of joint compression to the intact AC joint decreased the posterior translation in response to a posterior load (-6.6+/-2.5 vs -3.7+/-1.0 mm, p<0.05). Joint compression also decreased the in situ force in the superior AC capsule by 10 N while increasing the joint contact force by 20 N for all loading conditions (p<0.05). The application of joint compression to the capsule-transected AC joint significantly decreased the amount of posterior and superior translation during posterior (-12.7+/-6.1 vs -5.5+/-3.2 mm, p<0.05) and superior (5.3+/-2.9 vs 4.2+/-2.3 mm, p<0.05) loading, respectively, while significantly increasing the coupled translations (anterior-posterior, superior-inferior or proximal-distal) in all loading conditions (p<0.05). The joint contact force also significantly increased by 20 N for all loading conditions (p<0.05). This quantitative data suggests: (1) common surgical techniques such as distal clavicle resection, which initially reduce painful joint contact, may cause unusually high loads to be supported by the soft tissue structures at the AC joint; and (2) compressive loads transmitted across a capsule-transected AC joint could be concentrated over a smaller area due to the increased coupled motion and joint contact force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12706008     DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00197-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  6 in total

1.  Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Jan P Kempka; Steffen Schanz; Thore Zantop; Hazibullah Waizy; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of an independent acromioclavicular ligament repair for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel K Ibrahim; Patrick H Lam; Ricardo J Aveledo Anzola; George Ac Murrell
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-06-29

Review 3.  Surgical reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint: Can we identify the optimal approach?

Authors:  Alexander S North; Tracey Wilkinson
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2018-07-05

4.  Biomechanical comparison of an intramedullary and extramedullary free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex.

Authors:  Rishi Garg; Gregory J Adamson; Pooya Javidan; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-11-18

5.  The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on frozen shoulder patients' pain and functions.

Authors:  Chan Park; Sangyong Lee; Chae-Woo Yi; Kwansub Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-12-28

6.  Effects of the combined PNF and deep breathing exercises on the ROM and the VAS score of a frozen shoulder patient: Single case study.

Authors:  Byung-Ki Lee
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2015-10-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.