Literature DB >> 32561860

High-resolution mapping of mitotic DNA synthesis regions and common fragile sites in the human genome through direct sequencing.

Morgane Macheret1, Rahul Bhowmick2, Katarzyna Sobkowiak1, Laura Padayachy1, Jonathan Mailler1, Ian D Hickson3, Thanos D Halazonetis4.   

Abstract

DNA replication stress, a feature of human cancers, often leads to instability at specific genomic loci, such as the common fragile sites (CFSs). Cells experiencing DNA replication stress may also exhibit mitotic DNA synthesis (MiDAS). To understand the physiological function of MiDAS and its relationship to CFSs, we mapped, at high resolution, the genomic sites of MiDAS in cells treated with the DNA polymerase inhibitor aphidicolin. Sites of MiDAS were evident as well-defined peaks that were largely conserved between cell lines and encompassed all known CFSs. The MiDAS peaks mapped within large, transcribed, origin-poor genomic regions. In cells that had been treated with aphidicolin, these regions remained unreplicated even in late S phase; MiDAS then served to complete their replication after the cells entered mitosis. Interestingly, leading and lagging strand synthesis were uncoupled in MiDAS, consistent with MiDAS being a form of break-induced replication, a repair mechanism for collapsed DNA replication forks. Our results provide a better understanding of the mechanisms leading to genomic instability at CFSs and in cancer cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32561860      PMCID: PMC7784693          DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-0358-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Res        ISSN: 1001-0602            Impact factor:   46.297


  68 in total

1.  Molecular basis for expression of common and rare fragile sites.

Authors:  Eitan Zlotorynski; Ayelet Rahat; Jennifer Skaug; Neta Ben-Porat; Efrat Ozeri; Ruth Hershberg; Ayala Levi; Stephen W Scherer; Hanah Margalit; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites.

Authors:  Efrat Ozeri-Galai; Ronald Lebofsky; Ayelet Rahat; Assaf C Bester; Aaron Bensimon; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  A journey with common fragile sites: From S phase to telophase.

Authors:  Michelle Debatisse; Filippo Rosselli
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  The complex nature of fragile site plasticity and its importance in cancer.

Authors:  Dan Sarni; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 8.382

5.  Precise localization of aphidicolin-induced breakpoints on the short arm of human chromosome 3.

Authors:  W Paradee; C Mullins; Z He; T Glover; C Wilke; B Opalka; J Schutte; D I Smith
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-05-20       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Mouse Rif1 is a key regulator of the replication-timing programme in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Daniela Cornacchia; Vishnu Dileep; Jean-Pierre Quivy; Rossana Foti; Federico Tili; Rachel Santarella-Mellwig; Claude Antony; Geneviève Almouzni; David M Gilbert; Sara B C Buonomo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Oncogene-induced replication stress preferentially targets common fragile sites in preneoplastic lesions. A genome-wide study.

Authors:  P K Tsantoulis; A Kotsinas; P P Sfikakis; K Evangelou; M Sideridou; B Levy; L Mo; C Kittas; X-R Wu; A G Papavassiliou; V G Gorgoulis
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Large transcription units unify copy number variants and common fragile sites arising under replication stress.

Authors:  Thomas E Wilson; Martin F Arlt; So Hae Park; Sountharia Rajendran; Michelle Paulsen; Mats Ljungman; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy number alteration.

Authors:  Travis I Zack; Stephen E Schumacher; Scott L Carter; Andre D Cherniack; Gordon Saksena; Barbara Tabak; Michael S Lawrence; Cheng-Zhong Zhsng; Jeremiah Wala; Craig H Mermel; Carrie Sougnez; Stacey B Gabriel; Bryan Hernandez; Hui Shen; Peter W Laird; Gad Getz; Matthew Meyerson; Rameen Beroukhim
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  RAD52 and SLX4 act nonepistatically to ensure telomere stability during alternative telomere lengthening.

Authors:  Robert L Dilley; Tianpeng Zhang; Priyanka Verma; Melina T Gyparaki; Yiwen Li; Roger A Greenberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  25 in total

1.  Stimulation of adaptive gene amplification by origin firing under replication fork constraint.

Authors:  Alex J Whale; Michelle King; Ryan M Hull; Felix Krueger; Jonathan Houseley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Recombination and restart at blocked replication forks.

Authors:  Ralph Scully; Rajula Elango; Arvind Panday; Nicholas A Willis
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 3.  Break-induced replication: unraveling each step.

Authors:  Liping Liu; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 11.821

Review 4.  DNA replication: the recombination connection.

Authors:  Esther A Epum; James E Haber
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 20.808

5.  Mechanisms restraining break-induced replication at two-ended DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Nhung Pham; Zhenxin Yan; Yang Yu; Mosammat Faria Afreen; Anna Malkova; James E Haber; Grzegorz Ira
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Replication Stress, Genomic Instability, and Replication Timing: A Complex Relationship.

Authors:  Lina-Marie Briu; Chrystelle Maric; Jean-Charles Cadoret
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  The oncological relevance of fragile sites in cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin S Simpson; Hayley Pye; Hayley C Whitaker
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-12

8.  Tracking break-induced replication shows that it stalls at roadblocks.

Authors:  Liping Liu; Zhenxin Yan; Beth A Osia; Jerzy Twarowski; Luyang Sun; Juraj Kramara; Rosemary S Lee; Sandeep Kumar; Rajula Elango; Hanzeng Li; Weiwei Dang; Grzegorz Ira; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 69.504

9.  DNA replication is highly resilient and persistent under the challenge of mild replication stress.

Authors:  Camelia Mocanu; Eleftheria Karanika; María Fernández-Casañas; Alex Herbert; Tomisin Olukoga; Mete Emir Özgürses; Kok-Lung Chan
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 9.995

10.  Locus-specific transcription silencing at the FHIT gene suppresses replication stress-induced copy number variant formation and associated replication delay.

Authors:  So Hae Park; Pamela Bennett-Baker; Samreen Ahmed; Martin F Arlt; Mats Ljungman; Thomas W Glover; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.