Literature DB >> 21726815

Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites.

Efrat Ozeri-Galai1, Ronald Lebofsky, Ayelet Rahat, Assaf C Bester, Aaron Bensimon, Batsheva Kerem.   

Abstract

Perturbed DNA replication in early stages of cancer development induces chromosomal instability preferentially at fragile sites. However, the molecular basis for this instability is unknown. Here, we show that even under normal growth conditions, replication fork progression along the fragile site, FRA16C, is slow and forks frequently stall at AT-rich sequences, leading to activation of additional origins to enable replication completion. Under mild replication stress, the frequency of stalling at AT-rich sequences is further increased. Strikingly, unlike in the entire genome, in the FRA16C region additional origins are not activated, suggesting that all potential origins are already activated under normal conditions. Thus, the basis for FRA16C fragility is replication fork stalling at AT-rich sequences and inability to activate additional origins under replication stress. Our results provide a mechanism explaining the replication stress sensitivity of fragile sites and thus, the basis for genomic instability during early stages of cancer development.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21726815     DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  90 in total

1.  Genomic rearrangements at the FRA2H common fragile site frequently involve non-homologous recombination events across LTR and L1(LINE) repeats.

Authors:  Lena M Brueckner; Evgeny Sagulenko; Elisa M Hess; Diana Zheglo; Anne Blumrich; Manfred Schwab; Larissa Savelyeva
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Evidence for chromosome fragility at the frataxin locus in Friedreich ataxia.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Bruce Hayward; Asako J Nakamura; William M Bonner; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  DNA replication stress: from molecular mechanisms to human disease.

Authors:  Sergio Muñoz; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Cancer chromosomal instability: therapeutic and diagnostic challenges.

Authors:  Nicholas McGranahan; Rebecca A Burrell; David Endesfelder; Marco R Novelli; Charles Swanton
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  A blooming resolvase at chromosomal fragile sites.

Authors:  Achille Pellicioli; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 6.  The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.

Authors:  Simran Kaushal; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 7.  Mechanisms of Oncogene-Induced Replication Stress: Jigsaw Falling into Place.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kotsantis; Eva Petermann; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Chromosomal instability: a lack of new origins drives fragility.

Authors:  Nicola McCarthy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  Impediments to replication fork movement: stabilisation, reactivation and genome instability.

Authors:  Sarah Lambert; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 10.  The BLM dissolvasome in DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  Kelly A Manthei; James L Keck
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.