Literature DB >> 18084328

Oncogene-induced replication stress preferentially targets common fragile sites in preneoplastic lesions. A genome-wide study.

P K Tsantoulis1, A Kotsinas, P P Sfikakis, K Evangelou, M Sideridou, B Levy, L Mo, C Kittas, X-R Wu, A G Papavassiliou, V G Gorgoulis.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are regions of the genome prone to breakage by replication inhibitors (extrinsic replication stress). Recently, we and others observed that oncogene-induced replication stress (RS) induces DNA damage from the earliest stages of cancer. Our aim was to perform a genome-wide analysis in precancerous and cancerous experimental models to examine whether allelic imbalance occurs within CFSs. Subsequently, CFSs sequence characteristics were assessed. We used a growth-factor-induced human skin hyperplasia and a H-ras-induced mouse hyperplastic urothelium as preneoplastic models, along with an inducible U2OS-CDT1(Tet-ON) cancer cell line model, all bearing established oncogene-induced RS stimuli. Human DNA was analysed with Affymetrix SNP microarrays, while mouse DNA was analysed with Nimblegen array CGH. We studied 56 aphidicolin-type CFSs and 1914 regions of control, nonfragile DNA. Our theoretical in silico analysis spanned 2.16 billion nonoverlapping bases on human chromosomes 1-22. Our results provide direct experimental evidence indicating that genomic alterations were more common within CFSs in epidermal and urothelial preneoplastic lesions as well as in cancer. CFSs were on average less flexible than nonfragile regions, contained more guanine-cytosine (GC) and Alu sequences. Importantly, regions with loss-of-heterozygosity were also less flexible and had a higher Alu percentage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18084328     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  93 in total

1.  Genomic rearrangements at the FRA2H common fragile site frequently involve non-homologous recombination events across LTR and L1(LINE) repeats.

Authors:  Lena M Brueckner; Evgeny Sagulenko; Elisa M Hess; Diana Zheglo; Anne Blumrich; Manfred Schwab; Larissa Savelyeva
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Telomere dysfunction puts the brakes on oncogene-induced cancers.

Authors:  Cagatay Günes; Karl Lenhard Rudolph
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Evidence for chromosome fragility at the frataxin locus in Friedreich ataxia.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Bruce Hayward; Asako J Nakamura; William M Bonner; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Oncogenes create a unique landscape of fragile sites.

Authors:  Karin Miron; Tamar Golan-Lev; Raz Dvir; Eyal Ben-David; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Urothelial tumor initiation requires deregulation of multiple signaling pathways: implications in target-based therapies.

Authors:  Haiping Zhou; Hong-ying Huang; Ellen Shapiro; Herbert Lepor; William C Huang; Moosa Mohammadi; Ian Mohr; Moon-shong Tang; Chuanshu Huang; Xue-ru Wu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 6.  Genomic instability--an evolving hallmark of cancer.

Authors:  Simona Negrini; Vassilis G Gorgoulis; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Global organization of replication time zones of the mouse genome.

Authors:  Shlomit Farkash-Amar; Doron Lipson; Andreas Polten; Alon Goren; Charles Helmstetter; Zohar Yakhini; Itamar Simon
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  Unveiling Human Non-Random Genome Editing Mechanisms Activated in Response to Chronic Environmental Changes: I. Where Might These Mechanisms Come from and What Might They Have Led To?

Authors:  Loris Zamai
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  Impact of Replication Stress in Human Papillomavirus Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Cary A Moody
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  DNA damage response to the Mdm2 inhibitor nutlin-3.

Authors:  Rajeev Verma; Marc J Rigatti; Glenn S Belinsky; Cassandra A Godman; Charles Giardina
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 5.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.