Literature DB >> 32550440

Tools for Mos1-mediated single copy insertion (mosSCI) with excisable unc-119(+) or NeoR (G418) selection cassettes.

Reta Aram1, Kailynn MacGillivray1, Chengyin Li1, Arneet Saltzman1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32550440      PMCID: PMC7252316          DOI: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MicroPubl Biol        ISSN: 2578-9430


× No keyword cloud information.
Overview of plasmids for mosSCI at ttTi5605-compatible sites using G418 (NeoR) (A) or unc-119(+) (B) selection cassettes flanked by loxP sites. Both plasmids are modified from pCFJ151 (ttTi5605-MCS) (Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2008). Results of test injections (three different transgene constructs for each plasmid) are shown below the diagrams. The mosSCI “direct injection protocol” was followed, using Phsp::peel-1 and three mCherry(+) co-injection markers to screen against extrachromosomal arrays as described (Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2012)(www.wormbuilder.org). Transgenes in pALS297/NeoRor pALS186/unc-119(+) were used for mosSCI injections into strains ALS344 or EG6699, respectively (Table 1).

Description

Insertion of single-copy transgenes is an important tool in C. elegans genome engineering. Following the discovery that the Drosophila mariner element Mos1 could mobilize in the C. elegans germline (Bessereau et al. 2001), tools for efficient Mos1-mediated transgene insertion have been developed and widely adopted (Robert and Bessereau 2010). In parallel, the establishment of effective antibiotic selection in C. elegans offered increased versatility for genetic crosses and the advantage of injecting into phenotypically wild-type animals (Giordano-Santini et al. 2010, Semple et al. 2010). Reliable, site-specific, single-copy transgene insertion remains a key technique for applications such as synthetic reporters and rapid testing of genetic rescue constructs, especially when germline expression is required. The highly developed Mos1-mediated single-copy insertion (mosSCI) system is a toolkit of choice for this approach (Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2008, Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2012). The ttTi5605(mos1)II insertion site in particular has been used for stable germline expression, and plasmids targeting ttTi5605 are also compatible with the ‘universal’ mosSCI insertion sites (Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2014). To add to the suite of tools for targeting ttTi5605, we constructed two modified mosSCI plasmids (Figure 1). First, we made a plasmid for ttTi5605-mosSCI using G418 selection. Antibiotic selection has been incorporated into the miniMos system for random transgene insertion (Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2014), however existing ttTi5605-mosSCI plasmids use unc-119(+) selection. Our plasmid allows use of the ttTi5605 site without the need for injection into unc-119(ed3) mutants, which are more challenging to grow than wild-type animals and do not have optimal germline health on standard E. coli OP50 as a food source.
Figure 1

Overview of plasmids for mosSCI at ttTi5605-compatible sites using G418 (NeoR) (A) or unc-119(+) (B) selection cassettes flanked by loxP sites. Both plasmids are modified from pCFJ151 (ttTi5605-MCS) (Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2008). Results of test injections (three different transgene constructs for each plasmid) are shown below the diagrams. The mosSCI “direct injection protocol” was followed, using Phsp::peel-1 and three mCherry(+) co-injection markers to screen against extrachromosomal arrays as described (Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2012)(www.wormbuilder.org). Transgenes in pALS297/NeoRor pALS186/unc-119(+) were used for mosSCI injections into strains ALS344 or EG6699, respectively (Table 1).

Second, we modified the standard unc-119 selection-based ttTi5605-mosSCI plasmid (pCFJ151) by adding loxP recombination sites flanking the unc-119(+) selection cassette (Figure 1B). This change allows excision of the unc-119(+) selection cassette using an existing Cre recombinase protocol (Dickinson et al. 2013). Since unc-119(+) is a frequently used selection marker, this new feature will add flexibility for construction of strains with multiple transgenes. For increased versatility, both of the plasmids described here are minimal and do not encode additional tags or fluorescent proteins. Multiple-fragment transgenes can be seamlessly fused and cloned into these plasmids using the Gibson isothermal assembly technique by designing PCR amplicons, synthetic dsDNAs, restriction fragments or oligos with overlapping homologous ends (Gibson et al. 2009). We performed three independent test injections using different transgenes and found both of our plasmids to be effective for mosSCI (Figure 1). We also successfully excised the unc-119(+) cassette (Figure 1B) using Cre recombinase for two independent insertions (Methods). However, a caveat of the current NeoR plasmid (Figure 1A) is that no additional phenotypic marker was included between the loxP sites. Therefore, unlike unc-119(+) excision, which can be easily screened for using a visible phenotype, excision of NeoR would require screening by PCR or by loss of drug resistance. Overall, we hope that these excisable unc-119(+) and NeoR mosSCI plasmids will be useful companions to the extensive mosSCI plasmid and strain toolkit (Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2008, Zeiser et al. 2011, Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2012, Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2014).

Reagents

. Plasmid pALS186 (Addgene # 129539; Table 1) was constructed in two steps from pCFJ151 (Addgene # 19330). Briefly, the C. briggsae unc-119(+) selection cassette was removed, leaving a modified minimal multiple cloning site (MCS) between the ttTi5605 insertion homology arms. A PCR amplicon containing C. br. unc-119(+) flanked by loxP sites was cloned into the BssHII(PteI)/BglII sites. To construct plasmid pALS297 (Addgene# 129538; Table 1), the loxP::C. br. unc-119(+)::loxP selection cassette was excised from pALS186 by BssHII(PteI)/BglII digestion and replaced by an MluI/BglII-digested PCR amplicon containing the NeoR selection cassette flanked by loxP sites. The NeoR selection cassette (Prps-27::NeoR::unc-54-3ʹutr) was amplified from pCFJ910 (Addgene # 44481). To create strain ALS344, strain EG6699 (CGC; Table 1) was backcrossed 4X to wild-type N2 animals to remove the unc-119(ed3) allele. Segregation of unc-119(ed3) was followed by the unc phenotype. The ttTi5605(mos1) insertion site was followed using a three-oligo PCR (o508, o509, o91; Table 1) modified from the Wormbuilder site (http://www.wormbuilder.org/) to simultaneously amplify the ~720 bp product from the mos1 insertion allele and the 455 bp product from the wild-type allele. PCRs were performed with DreamTaq Green 2X PCR Mastermix (Thermo #K1081) using 1 uL of single worm lysate in a 20 uL reaction at an annealing temperature of 57°C. . Transgenes of interest were assembled from multiple PCR amplicons with ~20 nucleotide overlapping ends into mosSCI plasmids by Gibson Isothermal assembly (Gibson et al. 2009) using a home-made enzyme mix or a kit (NEB #E2621S). For assembly into AvrII(XmaJI)/XhoI-digested pALS297 or pALS186, the first fragment of the transgene is amplified using the forward primer op297-p186AvrIIF (Table 1) and a transgene-specific reverse primer. The last fragment of the transgene is amplified using a transgene-specific forward primer and the reverse primer op297XhoIR or op186XhoIR (Table 1) for assembly into pALS297 or pALS186, respectively. . Worm mosSCI transgenesis was performed according to the direct injection protocol (Frokjaer-Jensenet al., 2012) as described in detail on the Wormbuilder site (http://www.wormbuilder.org/). Transgene-containing mosSCI plasmids were purified by ZymoPURE plasmid miniprep (Zymo #D4209). Co-injected plasmids were purified by HiSpeed Plasmid Midi kit (Qiagen #12643). For unc-119(+)selection, plasmids were injected into strain EG6699 (Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2012), which was grown on E. coli HB101. For NeoRselection, plasmids were injected into strain ALS344 (Table 1) and G418 was added to plates the day after injection as described (Frokjaer-Jensen et al. 2014) (125 uL of 25 mg/mL G418 per 35 mm plate). Following heat-shock and counter-selection for co-injection markers, inserts were verified by PCR using pairs of primers where one primer hybridized to genomic DNA flanking the insertion site and outside of the vector homology arms (o145- 118 nt upstream of left homology arm, or o146- 63 nt downstream of right homology arm) and the second primer hybridized either within the transgene or selection cassette (Table 1). Amplification was carried out using either DreamTaq Green 2X PCR Mastermix (Thermo #K1081; for amplicons <2 kb) or Phusion polymerase (Thermo #F530L; for amplicons >2kb), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 20 uL reactions containing 1 uL of a 6uL single worm lysate as the template. . The C. br. unc-119(+) selection cassette was excised using Cre recombinase as described (Dickinson et al., 2013) using pDD104 (Peft-3::Cre; Addgene # 47551). Briefly, 15-20 animals were injected and moved onto 5-6 plates (3 P0 worms/plate). Approximately 15 F1 animals expressing the mCherry co-injection marker were singled. From the progeny of these animals, unc F2 animals were singled to establish excised lines. At least two independent lines were recovered from each of two independent trials. Cre-mediated excision of the NeoR selection cassette has not been tested. (or transgene-specific REV primer for long transgenes) (or transgene-specific REV primer for long transgenes) Table 1: List of plasmids, strains and oligonucleotides. Oligonucleotides with NM or JL designations were described by or adapted from Dr. M. Nonet (Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis) or Dr. J. L. Bessereau (Universitéde Lyon), respectively, based on protocols referenced on the Wormbuilder site (http://www.wormbuilder.org/). *, N20-22 represents 20-22 transgene-specific nucleotides.
Plasmids
pALS297 (ttTi5605-MCS loxP::Prps-27::NeoR::unc-54-3ʹutr::loxP); Addgene # 129538
pALS186 (ttTi5605-MCS loxP::C.br.unc-119(+)::loxP); Addgene # 129539
Strains
EG6699 ttTi5605(mos1) II; unc-119(ed3), CGC, note lost extrachromosomal array oxEx1578
ALS344 ttTi5605(mos1) II, this study; EG6699 was crossed 4x to N2 to remove the unc-119(ed3) allele
Primers to follow ttTi5605(mos1) II
o508-mos1F(oJL103) TCTGCGAGTTGTTTTTGCGTTTGAG
o509-ttTi5605F GATTGTTTGACCTGGCGGAACT
o91-ttTi55605R(NM3888) ACGCCCAGGAGAACACGTTAG
Primers for cloning
op297-p186AvrIIF TAGAGGGTACCAGAGCTCACCTAGGN*20-22
op297XhoIR GTTATaCGCGCACCGTACGTCTCGAGN*20-22
op186XhoIR GTTATgCGCGCACCGTACGTCTCGAGN*20-22
Primers for insert verification
5ʹarm, neoR mosSCI
o145-ttTi5605outerF AGGCAGAATGTGAACAAGACTCGAG (NM3880 + 2nt)
o496-unc54-3ʹutrR GGCCCAGACGTGCGAAGAAATA

(or transgene-specific REV primer for long transgenes)

3ʹarm, unc-119 mosSCI
o145-ttTi5605outerF AGGCAGAATGTGAACAAGACTCGAG (NM3880 + 2nt)
o147-Cbr-unc-119promR AAGTAGCAGAGCTGGGGAGAAGAA

(or transgene-specific REV primer for long transgenes)

5ʹarm, neoR mosSCI
o311-NeoRF CTTCTATCGCCTTCTTGACGAG
o146-ttTi5605outerR AATCGGGAGGCGAACCTAACTGT (NM3884 + 2nt)
3ʹarm, unc-119 mosSCI
Transgene-specific FOR primer
o146-ttTi5605outerR AATCGGGAGGCGAACCTAACTGT (NM3884 + 2nt)
  10 in total

1.  An antibiotic selection marker for nematode transgenesis.

Authors:  Rosina Giordano-Santini; Stuart Milstein; Nenad Svrzikapa; Domena Tu; Robert Johnsen; David Baillie; Marc Vidal; Denis Dupuy
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Rapid selection of transgenic C. elegans using antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Jennifer I Semple; Rosa Garcia-Verdugo; Ben Lehner
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases.

Authors:  Daniel G Gibson; Lei Young; Ray-Yuan Chuang; J Craig Venter; Clyde A Hutchison; Hamilton O Smith
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Mobilization of a Drosophila transposon in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ line.

Authors:  J L Bessereau; A Wright; D C Williams; K Schuske; M W Davis; E M Jorgensen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Manipulating the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using mariner transposons.

Authors:  Valérie J Robert; Jean-Louis Bessereau
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  MosSCI and gateway compatible plasmid toolkit for constitutive and inducible expression of transgenes in the C. elegans germline.

Authors:  Eva Zeiser; Christian Frøkjær-Jensen; Erik Jorgensen; Julie Ahringer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination.

Authors:  Daniel J Dickinson; Jordan D Ward; David J Reiner; Bob Goldstein
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Improved Mos1-mediated transgenesis in C. elegans.

Authors:  Christian Frøkjær-Jensen; M Wayne Davis; Michael Ailion; Erik M Jorgensen
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Christian Frøkjaer-Jensen; M Wayne Davis; Christopher E Hopkins; Blake J Newman; Jason M Thummel; Søren-Peter Olesen; Morten Grunnet; Erik M Jorgensen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Random and targeted transgene insertion in Caenorhabditis elegans using a modified Mos1 transposon.

Authors:  Christian Frøkjær-Jensen; M Wayne Davis; Mihail Sarov; Jon Taylor; Stephane Flibotte; Matthew LaBella; Andrei Pozniakovsky; Donald G Moerman; Erik M Jorgensen
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 28.547

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Modular safe-harbor transgene insertion for targeted single-copy and extrachromosomal array integration in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Sonia El Mouridi; Faisal Alkhaldi; Christian Frøkjær-Jensen
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.542

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.