Literature DB >> 32549894

A precise, reproducible method for measuring ultrasound probe slice thickness using a Gammex 403 phantom.

Steven J Jackson1, Stephen Russell1.   

Abstract

A precise, reproducible method for measuring ultrasound probe slice thickness has been developed for linear array ultrasound probes. The method used a custom built jig to draw the probe along the surface of a Gammex 403 phantom, with the image plane parallel to the filaments within the phantom. Still images at 0.5 mm intervals are saved for post-processing using in-house software. Slice thickness measurements with a precision of 0.1 mm are obtained. The method was shown to give reproducible estimates of probe slice thickness at several depths to within 0.4 mm during repeat tests. The method was able to provide information about the slice thickness of different sections of the probe face. It is expected that the method can quantify changes in probe performance due to lens wear or replacement over time that may elude both in-plane and in-air reverberation-based tests. A total of 18 linear probes were tested across eight centres, including six specialist vascular ultrasound centres. © The British Medical Ultrasound Society 2019.

Keywords:  Gammex Phantom; Ultrasound beam; physics; quality assurance; slice thickness

Year:  2019        PMID: 32549894      PMCID: PMC7273878          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X19830742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  8 in total

1.  Estimation of ultrasound beam width in the elevation (section thickness) plane.

Authors:  M L Skolnick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The automated assessment of ultrasound scanner lateral and slice thickness resolution: use of the step response.

Authors:  David E Rowland; Valentine R Newey; David P Turner; Dariush K Nassiri
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Real-time B-mode ultrasound quality control test procedures. Report of AAPM Ultrasound Task Group No. 1.

Authors:  M M Goodsitt; P L Carson; S Witt; D L Hykes; J M Kofler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Slice thickness measurements.

Authors:  A Goldstein
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  A multicentre survey of the condition of ultrasound probes.

Authors:  Nicholas J Dudley; Darren J Woolley
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2016-08-01

6.  Recognising small image quality differences for ultrasound probes and the potential of misdiagnosis due to undetected side lobes.

Authors:  Georg Doblhoff; Jaroslav Satrapa; Philip Coulthard
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2017-01-23

7.  BMUS guidelines for the regular quality assurance testing of ultrasound scanners by sonographers.

Authors:  Nick Dudley; Stephen Russell; Barry Ward; Peter Hoskins
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2013-11-29

8.  The Resolution Integral - a tool for characterising the performance of diagnostic ultrasound scanners.

Authors:  Carmel M Moran; Scott Inglis; Stephen D Pye
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-02-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.