Literature DB >> 28228823

Recognising small image quality differences for ultrasound probes and the potential of misdiagnosis due to undetected side lobes.

Georg Doblhoff1, Jaroslav Satrapa2, Philip Coulthard3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonic imaging is an integral and routine procedure in many medical applications. An increased awareness of the need for quality assurance in this field has led to numerous tests being proposed. Due to the complexity of the problem, the tests directly measuring the important parameters of resolution and contrast of low-echoic structures are not unified, often more qualitative than quantitative, and are performed at large periodic intervals. Uniform sensitivity of an array transducer is a necessary but insufficient requirement for imaging quality of an ultrasound probe. Good probe uniformity should in no way be confused with meaning the ultrasound probe is working as it should.
METHODS: In this paper, side lobes in the elevation direction and side and grating lobes in the lateral direction are discussed. Both may provide uniform element response across the scanner, yet result in a loss of resolution and contrast. To resolve problems of these resolution and contrast-relevant parameters being overlooked, a crossed filament phantom is introduced.
RESULTS: The cross-filament phantom provides the determination of resolution- and contrast-relevant parameters of a scanner, by directly measuring the main, side and grating-lobes of the beam in 3D. The main lobe 3D-data allows the determination of lateral and elevational resolution at different depths and thus the focal settings. In combination with the side and grating lobe information, the contrast for a small non-echoic object (i.e. a cyst) in an echoic environment may be explained.
CONCLUSION: We argue that regarding system acceptance, system baseline quality assurance and routine quality assurance, the analysis of the beam shape should be part of the comprehensive assessment. Combining the results with void resolution and contrast measurements is recommended.

Keywords:  Ultrasound image quality; beam shape; contrast; filament phantom; grating lobes; resolution; side lobes; uniformity; void phantom

Year:  2017        PMID: 28228823      PMCID: PMC5308391          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X16689281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  1 in total

1.  High incidence of defective ultrasound transducers in use in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Mattias Mårtensson; Mats Olsson; Björn Segall; Alan G Fraser; Reidar Winter; Lars-Ake Brodin
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-10-22
  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  A precise, reproducible method for measuring ultrasound probe slice thickness using a Gammex 403 phantom.

Authors:  Steven J Jackson; Stephen Russell
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2019-02-14

2.  Establishing a risk assessment framework for point-of-care ultrasound.

Authors:  Thomas W Conlon; Nadya Yousef; Juan Mayordomo-Colunga; Cecile Tissot; Maria V Fraga; Shazia Bhombal; Pradeep Suryawanshi; Alberto Medina Villanueva; Bijan Siassi; Yogen Singh
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.183

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.