Literature DB >> 19560252

The automated assessment of ultrasound scanner lateral and slice thickness resolution: use of the step response.

David E Rowland1, Valentine R Newey, David P Turner, Dariush K Nassiri.   

Abstract

The imaging performance assessment of ultrasound scanners based on traditional phantoms is limited by repeatability, subjectivity and systematic errors giving low confidence in results. A new approach to the automated measurement of scanner resolution is described. The method utilises a step change in backscatter to derive resolution from the imaging system line spread function and has been used to calculate resolution in two dimensions as a continuous function of depth. Resolution data was used to calculate resolution integrals for both lateral and slice thickness independently. For resolution integral repeatability, analysis of variance showed no significant difference between operators (p=0.05) with intra and inter-operator repeatability (+/-1 standard deviation) of 1.5% and 1.5% for lateral resolution, respectively, and 2.6% and 3.3% for slice thickness, respectively. Low contrast penetration was also calculated automatically and the worst case operator repeatability was 1.3%. The acoustic properties of the phantom were validated. The possibility of extending the technique to axial resolution is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19560252     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  4 in total

1.  The Resolution Integral - a tool for characterising the performance of diagnostic ultrasound scanners.

Authors:  Carmel M Moran; Scott Inglis; Stephen D Pye
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-02-06

2.  A precise, reproducible method for measuring ultrasound probe slice thickness using a Gammex 403 phantom.

Authors:  Steven J Jackson; Stephen Russell
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2019-02-14

3.  Intra- and interobserver reliability of gray scale/dynamic range evaluation of ultrasonography using a standardized phantom.

Authors:  Song Lee; Joon-Il Choi; Michael Yong Park; Dong Myung Yeo; Jae Young Byun; Seung Eun Jung; Sung Eun Rha; Soon Nam Oh; Young Joon Lee
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2014-02-26

4.  Evaluations of UltraiQ software for objective ultrasound image quality assessment using images from a commercial scanner.

Authors:  Zaiyang Long; Donald J Tradup; Scott F Stekel; Krzysztof R Gorny; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.