Literature DB >> 32549634

The Use of NFP When Pregnancy Is Contraindicated?

Justo Aznar1, Julio Tudela1.   

Abstract

The Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has declared the moral liceity of hysterectomy when certain medical criteria are met but does not exclude other options, "for example, recourse to infertile periods or total abstinence." Consequently, there may be couples who prefer to use natural family planning (NFP) methods. We shall refer to these in this article. The efficacy of NFP methods is determined by knowing the day of ovulation. To that end, three parameters are used: the presence and consistency of cervical mucus, measurement of the basal body temperature, and the determination of particular hormones in urine. Of the NFP methods used, the so-called sympto-thermal method seems to be the most effective. It has been concluded that the postovulatory or luteal phase of the female menstrual cycle is the safest time to avoid pregnancy if the couple has sexual intercourse during this period. Nevertheless, the use of NFP methods has limitations if the length of the cycles varies, there are fluctuations in the basal temperature, or when there are vaginal infections. Urinary hormone levels can also be altered by the use of antibiotics or psychotropic drugs. In general, however, it can be concluded that NFP methods, if used in the conditions mentioned herein, offer a high degree of reliability, similar to that of artificial contraceptive methods. Accordingly, if pregnancy must be avoided in the medical circumstances to which the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith refers, NFP methods can effectively replace hysterectomy, thereby circumventing the medical difficulties of this practice.
SUMMARY: The Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has declared the moral liceity of hysterectomy when certain medical criteria are met but does not exclude other options, "for example, recourse to infertile periods or total abstinence." Consequently, there may be couples who prefer to use natural family planning (NFP) methods. We shall refer to these in this article. In general, it can be concluded that NFP methods, if used in the conditions mentioned herein, offer a high degree of reliability, similar to that of artificial contraceptive methods. Accordingly, if pregnancy must be avoided in the medical circumstances to which the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith refers, NFP methods can effectively replace hysterectomy, thereby circumventing the medical difficulties of this practice. © Catholic Medical Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith; Efficacy; Hysterectomy; Moral assessment; Natural methods

Year:  2020        PMID: 32549634      PMCID: PMC7273637          DOI: 10.1177/0024363920902631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  49 in total

1.  Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation.

Authors:  D B Dunson; D D Baird; A J Wilcox; C R Weinberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Calendar methods of fertility regulation: a rule of thumb.

Authors:  B Colombo; B Scarpa
Journal:  Statistica       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  The future of professional education in natural family planning.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

4.  Expanding the availability and improving delivery of natural family planning services and fertility awareness education: providers' perspectives.

Authors:  M Arévalo
Journal:  Adv Contracept       Date:  1997 Jun-Sep

5.  Accuracy of the peak day of cervical mucus as a biological marker of fertility.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Effectiveness of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Peragallo Urrutia; Chelsea B Polis; Elizabeth T Jensen; Margaret E Greene; Emily Kennedy; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Temporary obstructive effect of human cervical mucus on spermatozoa throughout reproductive life: a scanning electron microscopic study.

Authors:  F C Chretien; G David
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Prospective European multi-center study of natural family planning (1989-1992): interim results. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups.

Authors: 
Journal:  Adv Contracept       Date:  1993-12

9.  Efficacy of a new method of family planning: the Standard Days Method.

Authors:  Marcos Arévalo; Victoria Jennings; Irit Sinai
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Morphological characterization of different human cervical mucus types using light and scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  M Menárguez; L M Pastor; E Odeblad
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.