Literature DB >> 12413617

Accuracy of the peak day of cervical mucus as a biological marker of fertility.

Richard J Fehring1.   

Abstract

The (PD) peak day of cervical mucus is an important biologic marker for the self-determination of the optimal time of fertility in a woman's menstrual cycle. The purpose of this article is to provide evidence (literature and empiric) for the accuracy of the PD of cervical mucus as a biologic marker of peak fertility and the estimated day of ovulation. An analysis of data from four published studies that compared the self-determination of the PD of cervical mucus with the urinary luteinizing hormone (LH) surge was conducted. The four studies yielded 108 menstrual cycle charts from 53 women participants. The 108 cycles ranged in length from 22 to 75 days (mean 29.4 SD 6.0). Ninety-three of the 108 cycles had both an identified PD and LH surge. Data charts showed that 97.8% of the PD fell within +/-4 days of the estimated day of ovulation. Use of a standardized mucus cycle scoring system indicated that the peak in cervical mucus ratings was highest on the day of the LH surge. Self-determination of the PD of cervical mucus is a very accurate means of determining peak fertility and a fairly accurate means of determining the day of ovulation and the beginning of the end of the fertile time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12413617     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00355-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  14 in total

Review 1.  Current Medical ResearchWinter/Spring 2014.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2015-02

2.  Self-Monitoring of Fertility Hormones: A New Era for Natural Family Planning?

Authors:  Leonard Blackwell; Delwyn Cooke; Simon Brown
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-03-28

3.  Physiological signs of ovulation and fertility readily observable by women.

Authors:  Martin Owen
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2013-02

4.  Couple Beads: An integrated method of natural family planning.

Authors:  George Mulcaire-Jones; Richard J Fehring; Megan Bradshaw; Karen Brower; Gonzaga Lubega; Paskazia Lubega
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2016-02

5.  Impact of instruction in the Creighton model fertilitycare system on time to pregnancy in couples of proven fecundity: results of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Ken R Smith; Michael W Varner
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  The Use of NFP When Pregnancy Is Contraindicated?

Authors:  Justo Aznar; Julio Tudela
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-02-11

7.  Pilot test and validation of the peak day method of prospective determination of ovulation against a handheld urine hormone monitor.

Authors:  Christina A Porucznik; Kyley J Cox; Karen C Schliep; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 8.  Detection of ovulation, a review of currently available methods.

Authors:  Hsiu-Wei Su; Yu-Chiao Yi; Ting-Yen Wei; Ting-Chang Chang; Chao-Min Cheng
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2017-05-16

9.  Peri-implantation intercourse does not lower fecundability.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Jared L Hansen; Sydney K Willis; Nan Hu; Alun Thomas
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  The case of Moulay Ismael--fact or fancy?

Authors:  Elisabeth Oberzaucher; Karl Grammer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.