Literature DB >> 12057784

Efficacy of a new method of family planning: the Standard Days Method.

Marcos Arévalo1, Victoria Jennings, Irit Sinai.   

Abstract

The Standard Days Method is a fertility awareness-based method of family planning in which users avoid unprotected intercourse during cycle Days 8 through 19. A prospective multi-center efficacy trial was conducted to test, in a heterogeneous population, the contraceptive efficacy of the Standard Days Method. A total of 478 women, age 18-39 years, in Bolivia, Peru, and the Philippines, with self-reported cycles of 26-32 days, desiring to delay pregnancy at least one year were admitted to the study. A single decrement multi-censoring life table analysis of the data indicate a cumulative probability of pregnancy of 4.75% over 13 cycles of correct use of the method, and a 11.96% probability of pregnancy under typical use. This article describes the study and the results. Results suggest that despite its requirement that couples modify their sexual behavior when the woman is fertile, the Standard Days Method provides significant protection from unplanned pregnancy and is acceptable to couples in a wide range of settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12057784     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00288-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  21 in total

Review 1.  Current Medical ResearchWinter/Spring 2014.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2015-02

2.  Couple Beads: An integrated method of natural family planning.

Authors:  George Mulcaire-Jones; Richard J Fehring; Megan Bradshaw; Karen Brower; Gonzaga Lubega; Paskazia Lubega
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2016-02

Review 3.  Contraceptive failure in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Understanding contraceptive failure.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.237

5.  Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app.

Authors:  E Berglund Scherwitzl; O Lundberg; H Kopp Kallner; K Gemzell Danielsson; J Trussell; R Scherwitzl
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Market-testing a smartphone application for family planning: assessing potential of the CycleBeads app in seven countries through digital monitoring.

Authors:  Liya T Haile; Hanley M Fultz; Rebecca G Simmons; Victoria Shelus
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2018-07-23

7.  The Use of NFP When Pregnancy Is Contraindicated?

Authors:  Justo Aznar; Julio Tudela
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-02-11

8.  Hormonal Contraception and the Informed Consent.

Authors:  David J Hilger; Kathleen M Raviele; Teresa A Hilgers
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-12-04

9.  Assessing the effect of introducing a new method into family planning programs in India, Peru, and Rwanda.

Authors:  Rebecka Lundgren; Irit Sinai; Priya Jha; Marie Mukabatsinda; Luisa Sacieta; Federico R León
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 10.  Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception.

Authors:  D A Grimes; M F Gallo; V Grigorieva; K Nanda; K F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.