Literature DB >> 10402400

Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation.

D B Dunson1, D D Baird, A J Wilcox, C R Weinberg.   

Abstract

Two studies have related the timing of sexual intercourse (relative to ovulation) to day-specific fecundability. The first was a study of Catholic couples practising natural family planning in London in the 1950s and 1960s and the second was of North Carolina couples attempting to become pregnant in the early 1980s. The former identified ovulation based on the ovulatory shift in the basal body temperature, while the latter used urinary assays of hormones. We use a statistical model to correct for error in identifying ovulation and to re-estimate the length of the fertile window and day-specific fecundabilities. We estimate the same 6-day fertile interval in both studies after controlling for error. After adjusting for error both data sets showed the highest estimate of the probability of pregnancy on the day prior to ovulation and both fell close to zero after ovulation. Given that the fertile interval is before ovulation, methods that anticipate ovulation by several days (such as the assessment of cervical mucus) would be particularly useful for couples who want to time their intercourse either to avoid or facilitate conception.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10402400     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.7.1835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  25 in total

1.  Are per-incident rape-pregnancy rates higher than per-incident consensual pregnancy rates?

Authors:  Jonathan A Gottschall; Tiffani A Gottschall
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2003-03

2.  Case reports of the Marquette method.

Authors:  Rebecca Peck
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2013-02

3.  Cervical mucus monitoring prevalence and associated fecundability in women trying to conceive.

Authors:  Emily Evans-Hoeker; David A Pritchard; D Leann Long; Amy H Herring; Joseph B Stanford; Anne Z Steiner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  The timing of the "fertile window" in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; D Dunson; D D Baird
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-18

5.  Fecundability in relation to use of mobile computing apps to track the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Sydney K Willis; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  The seasonality of conception.

Authors:  Ester Lucia Rizzi; Gianpiero Dalla-Zuanna
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2007-11

7.  Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  Coren L Apicella; David R Feinberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app.

Authors:  E Berglund Scherwitzl; O Lundberg; H Kopp Kallner; K Gemzell Danielsson; J Trussell; R Scherwitzl
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Flexible Bayesian Human Fecundity Models.

Authors:  Sungduk Kim; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis; Cecilia Pyper
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.728

10.  Impact of instruction in the Creighton model fertilitycare system on time to pregnancy in couples of proven fecundity: results of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Ken R Smith; Michael W Varner
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.