| Literature DB >> 32549289 |
Jie-Sheng Lin1, Faye Ya-Fen Chan1, Jason Leung2, Blanche Yu2,3, Zhi-Hui Lu3, Jean Woo3,4, Timothy Kwok2,3, Kevin Ka-Lun Lau1,4.
Abstract
A large number of studies have focused on the associations between single built environment (BE) characteristics and physical activity (PA). Combinations of BE characteristics offer a more comprehensive approach to identify the BE-PA associations. We aimed to examine the BE-PA associations in a cohort of elderly Hong Kong Chinese. Between 2001 and 2003, 3944 participants (65-98 years of age) were recruited and followed for a mean of 7.8 years. BE characteristics were assessed via geographic information system. PA levels were obtained using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly questionnaire at baseline and three follow-ups. Latent profile analysis was first conducted to classify the BE characteristics, and linear mixed-effects models were then used to explore the longitudinal associations between the BE classes and changes in the PA levels. Three classes of BE were identified. Class 3 (characterized by greater green space and sky view factor) demonstrated a significant decline in household PA (β = -1.26, 95% confidence interval: -2.20, -0.33) during the study period, and a slower decline in walking PA (1.19 (0.42, 1.95)) compared with Class 2 (characterized by a greater proportion of residential land use). Our results indicate that BE patterns characterized by high green space and a sky view factor may help promote the walking PA level.Entities:
Keywords: built environment; built environment pattern; cohort study; latent profile analysis; physical activity
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32549289 PMCID: PMC7344458 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flowchart of the study participants over the study period. * Number of participants who completed the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).
Built environment characteristics.
| Median | Interquartile Range | Min | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized building height, m | 31.8 | 14.1 | 0.00 | 74.8 |
| Mean sky view factor | 0.62 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 1.00 |
| Building ground coverage, % | 21.0 | 14.0 | 0.00 | 52.0 |
| Green space, % | 13.1 | 29.5 | 0.00 | 100 |
| Open space, % | 5.06 | 8.14 | 0.00 | 47.9 |
| Road coverage, % | 17.2 | 8.56 | 0.00 | 37.9 |
| Industrial land use, % | 0.00 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 38.3 |
| Residential land use, % | 36.9 | 17.0 | 0.00 | 99.5 |
| Commercial land use, % | 0.07 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 32.4 |
| Government, institution and community land use, % | 6.54 | 7.43 | 0.00 | 51.7 |
Figure 2Standardized mean (Z-score) for each built environment characteristic by latent class.
Baseline characteristics of the participants by built environment class.
| Class 1 ( | Class 2 ( | Class 3 ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) or Number (%) | ||||
| Age, years | 71.9 (4.84) | 72.6 (5.25) | 72.7 (5.26) | 0.004 |
| Sex, female, | 273 (41.1) | 1182 (51.4) | 517 (52.8) | <0.001 |
| Marital status, | <0.001 | |||
| Married | 525 (78.9) | 1596 (69.4) | 674 (68.8) | |
| Widowed | 117 (17.6) | 603 (26.2) | 251 (25.6) | |
| Separated or divorced | 10 (1.5) | 51 (2.2) | 27 (2.8) | |
| Single (never married) | 13 (2.0) | 50 (2.2) | 27 (2.8) | |
| Education level, | <0.001 | |||
| No education | 90 (13.5) | 525 (22.8) | 228 (23.3) | |
| Primary school or below | 308 (46.3) | 1137 (49.4) | 532 (54.3) | |
| Secondary school or above | 267 (40.2) | 638 (27.8) | 219 (22.4) | |
| Years lived in Hong Kong | 53.0 (14.7) | 53.0 (14.7) | 52.1 (15.5) | 0.216 |
| Alcohol drinking, | 102 (15.3) | 295 (12.8) | 118 (12.1) | 0.137 |
| Smoking, | 43 (6.5) | 157 (6.8) | 73 (7.5) | 0.711 |
| Number of chronic diseases, | 0.030 | |||
| 0 | 117 (17.6) | 390 (17.0) | 141 (14.4) | |
| 1 or 2 | 376 (56.5) | 1230 (53.5) | 576 (58.8) | |
| ≥3 | 172 (25.9) | 680 (29.5) | 262 (26.8) | |
| Self-rated health, | 0.151 | |||
| Very poor, poor or fair | 329 (49.5) | 1223 (53.2) | 530 (54.1) | |
| Good or very good | 336 (50.5) | 1077 (46.8) | 449 (45.9) | |
| Live alone, | 61 (9.2) | 270 (11.7) | 92 (9.4) | 0.054 |
| Depression, | 45 (6.8) | 224 (9.7) | 96 (9.8) | 0.052 |
| MMSE | 26.3 (3.19) | 25.5 (3.78) | 25.5 (3.71) | <0.001 |
| CSI-D | 30.6 (1.65) | 30.1 (2.08) | 30.0 (2.13) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: CSI-D, Community Screening Interview for Dementia; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; SD, standard deviation. 1 p-value was estimated by ANOVA (continuous variables) or chi-squared test (categorical variables).
Difference in the level of physical activity (PA) at baseline and change over 5 years with built environment class (case = 3944; observation = 9921) 1.
| Model 1 2 | Model 2 3 | Model 3 4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 5-Year Change | Baseline | 5-Year Change | 5-Year Change | |
| Total PA | |||||
| Class 2 vs. 1 | 0.07 (−3.05, 3.18) | −0.83 (−2.89, 1.22) | 0.22 (−2.85, 3.29) | −0.87 (−2.85, 1.12) | 0.16 (−1.66, 1.99) |
| Class 3 vs. 1 | 2.25 (−1.34, 5.83) | −1.76 (−4.13, 0.60) | 2.37 (−1.18, 5.91) | −1.23 (−3.51, 1.05) | −0.17 (−2.27, 1.92) |
| Class 3 vs. 2 | 2.18 (−0.59, 4.95) | −0.93 (−2.73, 0.87) | 2.14 (−0.58, 4.87) | −0.36 (−2.10, 1.37) | −0.34 (−1.93, 1.25) |
| Leisure PA | |||||
| Class 2 vs. 1 | −0.33 (−2.23, 1.57) | −0.41 (−1.69, 0.87) | −0.34 (−2.21, 1.54) | −0.39 (−1.65, 0.86) | −0.26 (−1.43, 0.91) |
| Class 3 vs. 1 | 0.64 (−1.54, 2.83) | 0.02 (−1.45, 1.49) | 0.60 (−1.57, 2.76) | 0.30 (−1.13, 1.74) | 0.68 (−0.66, 2.03) |
| Class 3 vs. 2 | 0.97 (−0.72, 2.66) | 0.43 (−0.69, 1.55) | 0.93 (−0.73, 2.60) | 0.70 (−0.40, 1.79) | 0.94 (−0.08, 1.97) |
| Household PA | |||||
| Class 2 vs. 1 | 0.54 (−1.29, 2.36) | −0.20 (−1.41, 1.00) | 0.69 (−1.12, 2.51) | −0.22 (−1.39, 0.95) | 0.44 (−0.64, 1.51) |
| Class 3 vs. 1 | 2.05 (−0.05, 4.15) | −1.69 (−3.08, −0.31) * | 2.20 (0.10, 4.29) * | −1.39 (−2.74, −0.04) * | −0.83 (−2.06, 0.40) |
| Class 3 vs. 2 | 1.52 (−0.10, 3.14) | −1.49 (−2.55, −0.44) ** | 1.50 (−0.10, 3.11) | −1.17 (−2.20, −0.14) * | −1.26 (−2.20, −0.33) ** |
| Walking PA | |||||
| Class 2 vs. 1 | 1.05 (−0.32, 2.41) | −0.60 (−1.54, 0.35) | 0.91 (−0.44, 2.27) | −0.58 (−1.51, 0.36) | −0.46 (−1.33, 0.42) |
| Class 3 vs. 1 | 0.77 (−0.80, 2.34) | 0.41 (−0.67, 1.50) | 0.58 (−0.98, 2.15) | 0.56 (−0.52, 1.63) | 0.73 (−0.27, 1.73) |
| Class 3 vs. 2 | −0.28 (−1.49, 0.93) | 1.01 (0.18, 1.83) * | −0.33 (−1.54, 0.87) | 1.13 (0.31, 1.95) ** | 1.19 (0.42, 1.95) ** |
1 β (95% confidence interval) were estimated from weighted linear mixed-effects models. 2 Model 1: including age, built environment class and their interaction term (age × built environment class), and adjusted for sex. 3 Model 2: Model 1 plus marital status, education level, alcohol drinking, smoking, years lived in Hong Kong, living alone, self-rated health, depression, Mini-Mental State Examination, Community Screening Interview for Dementia and number of chronic diseases. 4 Model 3: Model 2 plus level of baseline total, leisure, household and walking physical activity, respectively. * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01, *** p-value < 0.001.
Figure 3Trajectories of physical activity (PA) over age by built environment class. Trajectories derived from linear mixed-effects models, adjusted for age, sex, marital status, education level, alcohol drinking, smoking, years lived in Hong Kong, living alone, self-rated health, depression, Mini-Mental State, Examination Community Screening Interview for Dementia, number of chronic diseases and level of baseline total, leisure, household and walking physical activity.