UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVEV: This study examined whether multivariate profiles of the neighborhood recreation environment were associated with adolescent physical activity, sedentary time, and obesity. DESIGN: Residential addresses of 871 adolescents in San Diego County (53% female, mean age = 12.8 years) were geocoded to create 1-mile network buffers. MEASURES: Geographic information systems calculated neighborhood environmental variables. Accelerometers (worn 3-7 days) estimated daily moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time. Height and weight were directly measured. RESULTS: Latent profile analysis, using 7 environmental variables, resulted in 3 neighborhood profiles characterized as "open space" (OS), "residential with cul-de-sacs" (RWC), and "housing & facility dense" (HFD). These were named Adolescent Recreation Environment Accessibility (AREA) profiles. Multiple regression models stratified by gender tested associations between the AREA profiles and outcomes. Boys were less sedentary in the OS and RWC neighborhoods (7 hours per day) compared with the HFD neighborhoods (8 hours per day) (P < .01), and boys were more likely to be obese in the HFD neighborhoods (55%) compared with the OS group (24%) (P < .05). Girls in the RWC neighborhoods had lower MVPA levels (70 minutes per day) and were more likely to be obese (31%) than those in the OS neighborhoods (79 minutes per day MVPA, 21% obese) (Ps < .05). No differences were found for boys' MVPA or girls' sedentary time by the AREA profiles. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the complex relationships among environmental factors, activity levels, and obesity.nn.
UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVEV: This study examined whether multivariate profiles of the neighborhood recreation environment were associated with adolescent physical activity, sedentary time, and obesity. DESIGN: Residential addresses of 871 adolescents in San Diego County (53% female, mean age = 12.8 years) were geocoded to create 1-mile network buffers. MEASURES: Geographic information systems calculated neighborhood environmental variables. Accelerometers (worn 3-7 days) estimated daily moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time. Height and weight were directly measured. RESULTS: Latent profile analysis, using 7 environmental variables, resulted in 3 neighborhood profiles characterized as "open space" (OS), "residential with cul-de-sacs" (RWC), and "housing & facility dense" (HFD). These were named Adolescent Recreation Environment Accessibility (AREA) profiles. Multiple regression models stratified by gender tested associations between the AREA profiles and outcomes. Boys were less sedentary in the OS and RWC neighborhoods (7 hours per day) compared with the HFD neighborhoods (8 hours per day) (P < .01), and boys were more likely to be obese in the HFD neighborhoods (55%) compared with the OS group (24%) (P < .05). Girls in the RWC neighborhoods had lower MVPA levels (70 minutes per day) and were more likely to be obese (31%) than those in the OS neighborhoods (79 minutes per day MVPA, 21% obese) (Ps < .05). No differences were found for boys' MVPA or girls' sedentary time by the AREA profiles. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the complex relationships among environmental factors, activity levels, and obesity.nn.
Authors: R J Kuczmarski; C L Ogden; L M Grummer-Strawn; K M Flegal; S S Guo; R Wei; Z Mei; L R Curtin; A F Roche; C L Johnson Journal: Adv Data Date: 2000-06-08
Authors: Gregory J Norman; Marc A Adams; Karen J Calfas; Jennifer Covin; James F Sallis; Joseph S Rossi; Colleen A Redding; John Cella; Kevin Patrick Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2007-02
Authors: Russell R Pate; Natalie Colabianchi; Dwayne Porter; Maria J Almeida; Felipe Lobelo; Marsha Dowda Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Brian C Martinson; Gabriela VazquezBenitez; Carrie D Patnode; Mary O Hearst; Nancy E Sherwood; Emily D Parker; John Sirard; Keryn E Pasch; Leslie Lytle Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2011-10
Authors: Marc A Adams; James F Sallis; Terry L Conway; Lawrence D Frank; Brian E Saelens; Jacqueline Kerr; Kelli L Cain; Abby C King Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2012-11
Authors: Jonathan M Kurka; Marc A Adams; Michael Todd; Trina Colburn; James F Sallis; Kelli L Cain; Karen Glanz; Lawrence D Frank; Brian E Saelens Journal: Health Place Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Marc A Adams; James F Sallis; Jacqueline Kerr; Terry L Conway; Brian E Saelens; Lawrence D Frank; Gregory J Norman; Kelli L Cain Journal: Prev Med Date: 2011-03-05 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Carla P Bezold; James H Stark; Andrew Rundle; Kevin Konty; Sophia E Day; James Quinn; Kathryn Neckerman; Ana V Diez Roux Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Melanie M Wall; Nicole I Larson; Ann Forsyth; David C Van Riper; Dan J Graham; Mary T Story; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Marc A Adams; Michael Todd; Jonathan Kurka; Terry L Conway; Kelli L Cain; Lawrence D Frank; James F Sallis Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Robin S DeWeese; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati; Marc A Adams; Jonathan Kurka; Seung Yong Han; Michael Todd; Michael J Yedidia Journal: Health Place Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Salma Shariff-Marco; Mindy C DeRouen; Juan Yang; Jennifer Jain; David O Nelson; Margaret M Weden; Scarlett L Gomez Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Li Niu; Lindsay T Hoyt; Sarah Pickering; Anne Nucci-Sack; Anthony Salandy; Viswanathan Shankar; Elisa M Rodriguez; Robert D Burk; Nicolas F Schlecht; Angela Diaz Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2021-07-24 Impact factor: 5.012