Literature DB >> 32539386

Rigorous Free Energy Simulations in Virtual Screening.

Zoe Cournia1, Bryce K Allen2, Thijs Beuming3, David A Pearlman4, Brian K Radak2, Woody Sherman2.   

Abstract

Virtual high throughput screening (vHTS) in drug discovery is a powerful approach to identify hits: when applied successfully, it can be much faster and cheaper than experimental high-throughput screening approaches. However, mainstream vHTS tools have significant limitations: ligand-based methods depend on knowledge of existing chemical matter, while structure-based tools such as docking involve significant approximations that limit their accuracy. Recent advances in scientific methods coupled with dramatic speedups in computational processing with GPUs make this an opportune time to consider the role of more rigorous methods that could improve the predictive power of vHTS workflows. In this Perspective, we assert that alchemical binding free energy methods using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations have matured to the point where they can be applied in virtual screening campaigns as a final scoring stage to prioritize the top molecules for experimental testing. Specifically, we propose that alchemical absolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations offer the most direct and computationally efficient approach within a rigorous statistical thermodynamic framework for computing binding energies of diverse molecules, as is required for virtual screening. ABFE calculations are particularly attractive for drug discovery at this point in time, where the confluence of large-scale genomics data and insights from chemical biology have unveiled a large number of promising disease targets for which no small molecule binders are known, precluding ligand-based approaches, and where traditional docking approaches have foundered to find progressible chemical matter.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32539386     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  32 in total

1.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Application of Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation in Computer-Aided Drug Design.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Anthony Hazel; Wenbo Yu; Sunhwan Jo; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  New J Chem       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.591

3.  Estimation of binding rates and affinities from multiensemble Markov models and ligand decoupling.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Fast Equilibration of Water between Buried Sites and the Bulk by Molecular Dynamics with Parallel Monte Carlo Water Moves on Graphical Processing Units.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Charles Lin; Brian K Radak; Woody Sherman; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Zhixiong Lin; Brian K Radak; Charles Lin; Woody Sherman; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  CHARMM-GUI Free Energy Calculator for Absolute and Relative Ligand Solvation and Binding Free Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Seonghoon Kim; Hiraku Oshima; Han Zhang; Nathan R Kern; Suyong Re; Jumin Lee; Benoît Roux; Yuji Sugita; Wei Jiang; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Challenges Encountered Applying Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Hannah M Baumann; Vytautas Gapsys; Bert L de Groot; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Application of the alchemical transfer and potential of mean force methods to the SAMPL8 host-guest blinded challenge.

Authors:  Solmaz Azimi; Joe Z Wu; Sheenam Khuttan; Tom Kurtzman; Nanjie Deng; Emilio Gallicchio
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Identify potent SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors via accelerated free energy perturbation-based virtual screening of existing drugs.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Xin Li; Yi-You Huang; Yaoxing Wu; Runduo Liu; Lingli Zhou; Yuxi Lin; Deyan Wu; Lei Zhang; Hao Liu; Ximing Xu; Kunqian Yu; Yuxia Zhang; Jun Cui; Chang-Guo Zhan; Xin Wang; Hai-Bin Luo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Quantum simulations of SARS-CoV-2 main protease Mpro enable high-quality scoring of diverse ligands.

Authors:  Yuhang Wang; Sruthi Murlidaran; David A Pearlman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.