Literature DB >> 32517620

Urban moth communities suggest that life in the city favours thermophilic multi-dimensional generalists.

Markus Franzén1, Per-Eric Betzholtz2, Lars B Pettersson3, Anders Forsman1.   

Abstract

Biodiversity is challenged worldwide by exploitation, global warming, changes in land use and increasing urbanization. It is hypothesized that communities in urban areas should consist primarily of generalist species with broad niches that are able to cope with novel, variable, fragmented, warmer and unpredictable environments shaped by human pressures. We surveyed moth communities in three cities in northern Europe and compared them with neighbouring moth assemblages constituting species pools of potential colonizers. We found that urban moth communities consisted of multi-dimensional generalist species that had larger distribution ranges, more variable colour patterns, longer reproductive seasons, broader diets, were more likely to overwinter as an egg, more thermophilic, and occupied more habitat types compared with moth communities in surrounding areas. When body size was analysed separately, results indicated that city occupancy was associated with larger size, but this effect disappeared when body size was analysed together with the other traits. Our findings indicate that urbanization imposes a spatial filtering process in favour of thermophilic species characterized by high intraspecific diversity and multi-dimensional generalist lifestyles over specialized species with narrow niches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  generalization; global change; moths; specialization; species traits; urbanization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32517620      PMCID: PMC7341934          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.3014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  27 in total

1.  Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities.

Authors:  Nathan J B Kraft; William K Cornwell; Campbell O Webb; David D Ackerly
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Ecological consequences of genetic diversity.

Authors:  A Randall Hughes; Brian D Inouye; Marc T J Johnson; Nora Underwood; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 3.  Effects of genotypic and phenotypic variation on establishment are important for conservation, invasion, and infection biology.

Authors:  Anders Forsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Life-history traits and landscape characteristics predict macro-moth responses to forest fragmentation.

Authors:  Eleanor M Slade; Thomas Merckx; Terhi Riutta; Daniel P Bebber; David Redhead; Philip Riordan; David W Macdonald
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Body-size shifts in aquatic and terrestrial urban communities.

Authors:  Thomas Merckx; Caroline Souffreau; Aurélien Kaiser; Lisa F Baardsen; Thierry Backeljau; Dries Bonte; Kristien I Brans; Marie Cours; Maxime Dahirel; Nicolas Debortoli; Katrien De Wolf; Jessie M T Engelen; Diego Fontaneto; Andros T Gianuca; Lynn Govaert; Frederik Hendrickx; Janet Higuti; Luc Lens; Koen Martens; Hans Matheve; Erik Matthysen; Elena Piano; Rose Sablon; Isa Schön; Karine Van Doninck; Luc De Meester; Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Nonnative plants reduce population growth of an insectivorous bird.

Authors:  Desirée L Narango; Douglas W Tallamy; Peter P Marra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Urban biodiversity: patterns and mechanisms.

Authors:  Stanley H Faeth; Christofer Bang; Susanna Saari
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  The ecological importance of intraspecific variation.

Authors:  Simone Des Roches; David M Post; Nash E Turley; Joseph K Bailey; Andrew P Hendry; Michael T Kinnison; Jennifer A Schweitzer; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 15.460

9.  Faster poleward range shifts in moths with more variable colour patterns.

Authors:  Anders Forsman; Per-Eric Betzholtz; Markus Franzén
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review.

Authors:  Callum J MacGregor; Michael J O Pocock; Richard Fox; Darren M Evans
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.465

View more
  2 in total

1.  A window to the world of global insect declines: Moth biodiversity trends are complex and heterogeneous.

Authors:  David L Wagner; Richard Fox; Danielle M Salcido; Lee A Dyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Individual variation in feeding morphology, not diet, can facilitate the success of generalist species in urban ecosystems.

Authors:  Piatã Marques; Eugenia Zandonà; Rosana Mazzoni; Rana El-Sabaawi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.