Literature DB >> 30348792

Nonnative plants reduce population growth of an insectivorous bird.

Desirée L Narango1,2, Douglas W Tallamy3, Peter P Marra2.   

Abstract

Human-dominated landscapes represent one of the most rapidly expanding and least-understood ecosystems on earth. Yet, we know little about which features in these landscapes promote sustainable wildlife populations. Historically, in urban areas, landowners have converted native plant communities into habitats dominated by nonnative species that are not susceptible to pest damage and require little maintenance. However, nonnative plants are also poor at supporting insects that are critical food resources for higher order consumers. Despite the logical connection, no study has examined the impact of nonnative plants on subsequent population responses of vertebrate consumers. Here, we demonstrate that residential yards dominated by nonnative plants have lower arthropod abundance, forcing resident Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis) to switch diets to less preferred prey and produce fewer young, or forgo reproduction in nonnative sites altogether. This leads to lower reproductive success and unsustainable population growth in these yards compared with those with >70% native plant biomass. Our results reveal that properties landscaped with nonnative plants function as population sinks for insectivorous birds. To promote sustainable food webs, urban planners and private landowners should prioritize native plant species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conservation; food webs; native plants; plant–animal interactions; urban ecology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30348792      PMCID: PMC6233133          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809259115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  The role of exotic species in homogenizing the North American flora.

Authors:  Hong Qian; Robert E Ricklefs
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities.

Authors:  Vincent Devictor; Romain Julliard; Denis Couvet; Alexandre Lee; Frédéric Jiguet
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Ranking lepidopteran use of native versus introduced plants.

Authors:  Douglas W Tallamy; Kimberley J Shropshire
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 4.  Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments.

Authors:  Mark A Goddard; Andrew J Dougill; Tim G Benton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  The potential conservation value of non-native species.

Authors:  Martin A Schlaepfer; Dov F Sax; Julian D Olden
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  The conservation value of residential yards: linking birds and people.

Authors:  Susannah B Lerman; Paige S Warren
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  The global distribution of diet breadth in insect herbivores.

Authors:  Matthew L Forister; Vojtech Novotny; Anna K Panorska; Leontine Baje; Yves Basset; Philip T Butterill; Lukas Cizek; Phyllis D Coley; Francesca Dem; Ivone R Diniz; Pavel Drozd; Mark Fox; Andrea E Glassmire; Rebecca Hazen; Jan Hrcek; Joshua P Jahner; Ondrej Kaman; Tomasz J Kozubowski; Thomas A Kursar; Owen T Lewis; John Lill; Robert J Marquis; Scott E Miller; Helena C Morais; Masashi Murakami; Herbert Nickel; Nicholas A Pardikes; Robert E Ricklefs; Michael S Singer; Angela M Smilanich; John O Stireman; Santiago Villamarín-Cortez; Stepan Vodka; Martin Volf; David L Wagner; Thomas Walla; George D Weiblen; Lee A Dyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Defaunation in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Rodolfo Dirzo; Hillary S Young; Mauro Galetti; Gerardo Ceballos; Nick J B Isaac; Ben Collen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Ecological homogenization of residential macrosystems.

Authors:  Peter M Groffman; Meghan Avolio; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Neil D Bettez; J Morgan Grove; Sharon J Hall; Sarah E Hobbie; Kelli L Larson; Susannah B Lerman; Dexter H Locke; James B Heffernan; Jennifer L Morse; Christopher Neill; Kristen C Nelson; Jarlath O'Neil-Dunne; Diane E Pataki; Colin Polsky; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; Tara L E Trammell
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 15.460

10.  More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas.

Authors:  Caspar A Hallmann; Martin Sorg; Eelke Jongejans; Henk Siepel; Nick Hofland; Heinz Schwan; Werner Stenmans; Andreas Müller; Hubert Sumser; Thomas Hörren; Dave Goulson; Hans de Kroon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  Opinion: Eight simple actions that individuals can take to save insects from global declines.

Authors:  Akito Y Kawahara; Lawrence E Reeves; Jesse R Barber; Scott H Black
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Urban moth communities suggest that life in the city favours thermophilic multi-dimensional generalists.

Authors:  Markus Franzén; Per-Eric Betzholtz; Lars B Pettersson; Anders Forsman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Local- and landscape-scale variables shape insect diversity in an urban biodiversity hot spot.

Authors:  Benjamin J Adams; Enjie Li; Christine A Bahlai; Emily K Meineke; Terrence P McGlynn; Brian V Brown
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.105

4.  Few keystone plant genera support the majority of Lepidoptera species.

Authors:  Desiree L Narango; Douglas W Tallamy; Kimberley J Shropshire
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Diet composition and diversity does not explain fewer, smaller urban nestlings.

Authors:  Erin E Grabarczyk; Sharon A Gill; Maarten J Vonhof; Magdy S Alabady; Zengyan Wang; Jason M Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bitter fruits of hard labour: diet metabarcoding and telemetry reveal that urban songbirds travel further for lower-quality food.

Authors:  Crinan Jarrett; Luke L Powell; Heather McDevitt; Barbara Helm; Andreanna J Welch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Vegetation communities on commercial developments are heterogenous and determined by development and landscaping decisions, not socioeconomics.

Authors:  Karen Dyson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Flower power in the city: Replacing roadside shrubs by wildflower meadows increases insect numbers and reduces maintenance costs.

Authors:  Karsten Mody; Doris Lerch; Ann-Kathrin Müller; Nadja K Simons; Nico Blüthgen; Matthias Harnisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The importance of street trees to urban avifauna.

Authors:  Eric M Wood; Sevan Esaian
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 6.105

10.  Non-Native Non-Apis Bees Are More Abundant on Non-Native Versus Native Flowering Woody Landscape Plants.

Authors:  Daniel A Potter; Bernadette M Mach
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.