Literature DB >> 23951712

Life-history traits and landscape characteristics predict macro-moth responses to forest fragmentation.

Eleanor M Slade1, Thomas Merckx, Terhi Riutta, Daniel P Bebber, David Redhead, Philip Riordan, David W Macdonald.   

Abstract

How best to manage forest patches, mitigate the consequences of forest fragmentation, and enable landscape permeability are key questions facing conservation scientists and managers. Many temperate forests have become increasingly fragmented, resulting in reduced interior forest habitat, increased edge habitats, and reduced connectivity. Using a citizen science landscape-scale mark-release-recapture study on 87 macro-moth species, we investigated how both life-history traits and landscape characteristics predicted macro-moth responses to forest fragmentation. Wingspan, wing shape, adult feeding, and larval feeding guild predicted macro-moth mobility, although the predictive power of wingspan and wing shape depended on the species' affinity to the forest. Solitary trees and small fragments functioned as "stepping stones," especially when their landscape connectivity was increased, by being positioned within hedgerows or within a favorable matrix. Mobile forest specialists were most affected by forest fragmentation: despite their high intrinsic dispersal capability, these species were confined mostly to the largest of the forest patches due to their strong affinity for the forest habitat, and were also heavily dependent on forest connectivity in order to cross the agricultural matrix. Forest fragments need to be larger than five hectares and to have interior forest more than 100 m from the edge in order to sustain populations of forest specialists. Our study provides new insights into the movement patterns of a functionally important insect group, with implications for the landscape-scale management of forest patches within agricultural landscapes.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23951712     DOI: 10.1890/12-1366.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  16 in total

1.  Urban stress is associated with variation in microbial species composition-but not richness-in Manhattan.

Authors:  Aspen T Reese; Amy Savage; Elsa Youngsteadt; Krista L McGuire; Adam Koling; Olivia Watkins; Steven D Frank; Robert R Dunn
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Urban moth communities suggest that life in the city favours thermophilic multi-dimensional generalists.

Authors:  Markus Franzén; Per-Eric Betzholtz; Lars B Pettersson; Anders Forsman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  More winners than losers over 12 years of monitoring tiger moths (Erebidae: Arctiinae) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama.

Authors:  Greg P A Lamarre; Nicholas A Pardikes; Simon Segar; Charles N Hackforth; Michel Laguerre; Benoît Vincent; Yacksecari Lopez; Filonila Perez; Ricardo Bobadilla; José Alejandro Ramírez Silva; Yves Basset
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Phenotypic variation in a neotropical understory bird driven by environmental change in an urbanizing Amazonian landscape.

Authors:  Stefano Spiteri Avilla; Kathryn E Sieving; Marina Anciães; Cintia Cornelius
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Spatial patterns of movement of dung beetle species in a tropical forest suggest a new trap spacing for dung beetle biodiversity studies.

Authors:  Pedro Giovâni da Silva; Malva Isabel Medina Hernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Surveying moths using light traps: effects of weather and time of year.

Authors:  Dennis Jonason; Markus Franzén; Thomas Ranius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization.

Authors:  Sagrario Gámez-Virués; David J Perović; Martin M Gossner; Carmen Börschig; Nico Blüthgen; Heike de Jong; Nadja K Simons; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Jochen Krauss; Gwen Maier; Christoph Scherber; Juliane Steckel; Christoph Rothenwöhrer; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Christiane N Weiner; Wolfgang Weisser; Michael Werner; Teja Tscharntke; Catrin Westphal
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  The Saturniidae of Barro Colorado Island, Panama: A model taxon for studying the long-term effects of climate change?

Authors:  Yves Basset; Greg P A Lamarre; Tom Ratz; Simon T Segar; Thibaud Decaëns; Rodolphe Rougerie; Scott E Miller; Filonila Perez; Ricardo Bobadilla; Yacksecari Lopez; José Alejandro Ramirez; Annette Aiello; Héctor Barrios
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  BIOFRAG - a new database for analyzing BIOdiversity responses to forest FRAGmentation.

Authors:  Marion Pfeifer; Veronique Lefebvre; Toby A Gardner; Victor Arroyo-Rodriguez; Lander Baeten; Cristina Banks-Leite; Jos Barlow; Matthew G Betts; Joerg Brunet; Alexis Cerezo; Laura M Cisneros; Stuart Collard; Neil D'Cruze; Catarina da Silva Motta; Stephanie Duguay; Hilde Eggermont; Felix Eigenbrod; Adam S Hadley; Thor R Hanson; Joseph E Hawes; Tamara Heartsill Scalley; Brian T Klingbeil; Annette Kolb; Urs Kormann; Sunil Kumar; Thibault Lachat; Poppy Lakeman Fraser; Victoria Lantschner; William F Laurance; Inara R Leal; Luc Lens; Charles J Marsh; Guido F Medina-Rangel; Stephanie Melles; Dirk Mezger; Johan A Oldekop; William L Overal; Charlotte Owen; Carlos A Peres; Ben Phalan; Anna M Pidgeon; Oriana Pilia; Hugh P Possingham; Max L Possingham; Dinarzarde C Raheem; Danilo B Ribeiro; Jose D Ribeiro Neto; W Douglas Robinson; Richard Robinson; Trina Rytwinski; Christoph Scherber; Eleanor M Slade; Eduardo Somarriba; Philip C Stouffer; Matthew J Struebig; Jason M Tylianakis; Teja Tscharntke; Andrew J Tyre; Jose N Urbina Cardona; Heraldo L Vasconcelos; Oliver Wearn; Konstans Wells; Michael R Willig; Eric Wood; Richard P Young; Andrew V Bradley; Robert M Ewers
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Macrolepidoptera biodiversity in Wooster, Ohio from 2001 through 2009.

Authors:  Roger A Downer; Timothy A Ebert
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.