Literature DB >> 29203921

The ecological importance of intraspecific variation.

Simone Des Roches1, David M Post2, Nash E Turley3, Joseph K Bailey4, Andrew P Hendry5, Michael T Kinnison6, Jennifer A Schweitzer4, Eric P Palkovacs7.   

Abstract

Human activity is causing wild populations to experience rapid trait change and local extirpation. The resulting effects on intraspecific variation could have substantial consequences for ecological processes and ecosystem services. Although researchers have long acknowledged that variation among species influences the surrounding environment, only recently has evidence accumulated for the ecological importance of variation within species. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing the ecological effects of variation within a species (intraspecific effects) with the effects of replacement or removal of that species (species effects). We evaluated direct and indirect ecological responses, including changes in abundance (or biomass), rates of ecological processes and changes in community composition. Our results show that intraspecific effects are often comparable to, and sometimes stronger than, species effects. Species effects tend to be larger for direct ecological responses (for example, through consumption), whereas intraspecific effects and species effects tend to be similar for indirect responses (for example, through trophic cascades). Intraspecific effects are especially strong when indirect interactions alter community composition. Our results summarize data from the first generation of studies examining the relative ecological effects of intraspecific variation. Our conclusions can help inform the design of future experiments and the formulation of strategies to quantify and conserve biodiversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29203921     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0402-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  76 in total

1.  Species-specific trait-environment relationships among populations of widespread grass species.

Authors:  Carla M Roybal; Bradley J Butterfield
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Evolutionary origins for ecological patterns in space.

Authors:  Mark C Urban; Sharon Y Strauss; Fanie Pelletier; Eric P Palkovacs; Mathew A Leibold; Andrew P Hendry; Luc De Meester; Stephanie M Carlson; Amy L Angert; Sean T Giery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Conserving intraspecific variation for nature's contributions to people.

Authors:  Simone Des Roches; Linwood H Pendleton; Beth Shapiro; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Sexual dimorphism in a top predator (Notophthalmus viridescens) drives aquatic prey community assembly.

Authors:  Denon Start; Stephen De Lisle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The importance of genomic variation for biodiversity, ecosystems and people.

Authors:  Madlen Stange; Rowan D H Barrett; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Plant traits alone are poor predictors of ecosystem properties and long-term ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Fons van der Plas; Thomas Schröder-Georgi; Alexandra Weigelt; Kathryn Barry; Sebastian Meyer; Adriana Alzate; Romain L Barnard; Nina Buchmann; Hans de Kroon; Anne Ebeling; Nico Eisenhauer; Christof Engels; Markus Fischer; Gerd Gleixner; Anke Hildebrandt; Eva Koller-France; Sophia Leimer; Alexandru Milcu; Liesje Mommer; Pascal A Niklaus; Yvonne Oelmann; Christiane Roscher; Christoph Scherber; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Stefan Scheu; Bernhard Schmid; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; Vicky Temperton; Teja Tscharntke; Winfried Voigt; Wolfgang Weisser; Wolfgang Wilcke; Christian Wirth
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  Repeatable ecological dynamics govern the response of experimental communities to antibiotic pulse perturbation.

Authors:  Johannes Cairns; Roosa Jokela; Lutz Becks; Ville Mustonen; Teppo Hiltunen
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 15.460

8.  Pelagic and benthic ecosystems drive differences in population and individual specializations in marine predators.

Authors:  Sabrina Riverón; Vincent Raoult; Alastair M M Baylis; Kayleigh A Jones; David J Slip; Robert G Harcourt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Condition-dependent responses of fish to motorboats.

Authors:  H R Harding; T A C Gordon; K Wong; M I McCormick; S D Simpson; A N Radford
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Eco-evolutionary feedbacks link prey adaptation to predator performance.

Authors:  David C Fryxell; Zachary T Wood; Rebecca Robinson; Michael T Kinnison; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.