| Literature DB >> 32514279 |
Luca Pangrazzi1,2, Erin Naismith1, Carina Miggitsch1,3, Jose' Antonio Carmona Arana1, Michael Keller1, Beatrix Grubeck-Loebenstein1, Birgit Weinberger1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity has been associated with chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. Both conditions play a determinant role in the pathogenesis of age-related diseases, such as immunosenescence. Adipose tissue can modulate the function of the immune system with the secretion of molecules influencing the phenotype of immune cells. The importance of the bone marrow (BM) in the maintenance of antigen-experienced adaptive immune cells has been documented in mice. Recently, some groups have investigated the survival of effector/memory T cells in the human BM. Despite this, whether high body mass index (BMI) may affect immune cells in the BM and the production of molecules supporting the maintenance of these cells it is unknown.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; Bone marrow; CMV; Human; Peripheral blood; T cells
Year: 2020 PMID: 32514279 PMCID: PMC7251898 DOI: 10.1186/s12979-020-00186-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Immun Ageing ISSN: 1742-4933 Impact factor: 6.400
Fig. 1Levels of cytokines and ROS in the BM are affected by BMI. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of (a) IL-15 and (b) IL-6 measured using flow cytometry in persons with BMI < 25 and BMI > 30 is shown. Unpaired t test, *p < 0.05. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. Relationship between ROS levels (=DHE MFI) (c), frequency of IFNγ+CD8+ T cells (d), TNF+CD8+ T cells (e) in BMMCs and BMI. Correlation between IFNγ+CD4+ T cells (f) and TNF+CD4+ T cells (g) in PBMCs and BMI. Spearman coefficient (rs), sample number (N), and p-values are reported in each graph. Representative histograms showing the intensity of IL-15, IL-6 and DHE in donors with BMI < 25 (BMI = 23.2) and BMI > 30 (BMI = 34.6) are shown
Correlations of immune cell populations in in the human BM with BMI
| All | CMV | CMV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | rs | rs | ||||
| NK cells | 0.05 | 0.72 | 0.16 | 0.46 | 0.08 | 0.69 |
| NKT cells | 0.07 | 0.64 | 0.13 | 0.55 | 0.03 | 0.89 |
| monocytes | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.22 |
| 0.10 | 0.34 | 0.19 | 0.20 | |||
| plasma cells | 0.30 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.57 | 0.39 | 0.16 |
| T cells | 0.09 | 0.57 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 0.95 |
| CD8+ T cells | 0.07 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 0.88 | 0.02 | 0.92 |
| 0.12 | 0.59 | |||||
Spearman correlation coefficients (rs) and p values for CMV− and CMV+ persons and for the whole cohort are shown. p < 0.05 was considered significant. For NK, NKT, monocytes, T cells, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells NCMV− = 30, NCMV+ = 35, Nall = 65, for B cells and plasma cells NCMV− = 19, NCMV+ = 22, Nall = 41 (part of the same cohort). NK cells are defined as CD3−CD56+, T cells as CD3+, NKT cells as CD3+CD56+, monocytes as CD14+ and B cells as CD19+ leukocytes. Plasma cells are defined as CD38hiCD138+ B cells. Detailed gating strategy is shown in Fig. 2
Statistically significant values are shown in bold
Fig. 2Gating strategy for the population of interest. Representative FACS plot with the gating strategy for monocytes, T cells, NKT cells, NK cells, B cells and plasma cells are shown
Correlations between CD4+ T cell subsets, expression of PD-1 and IL-7Rα within CD4+ T cell subsets in the BM and BMI
| All | CMV | CMV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | rs | rs | ||||
| 0.12 | 0.59 | |||||
| 0.23 | 0.35 | |||||
| − 0.18 | 0.46 | |||||
| − 0.03 | 0.87 | − 0.15 | 0.53 | |||
| CD4+CD28− | − 0.02 | 0.91 | − 0.16 | 0.50 | − 0.01 | 0.96 |
| CD4+CD57+ | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.42 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| −0.20 | 0.73 | − 0.39 | 0.08 | |||
| 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.91 | |||
| − 0.21 | 0.39 | − 0.22 | 0.34 | |||
| −0.16 | 0.48 | |||||
| CD57+CD4+TEM | −0.19 | 0.22 | −0.02 | 0.93 | 0.14 | 0.55 |
| PD-1+CD4+TEMRA | −0.33 | 0.10 | −0.19 | 0.44 | 0.01 | 0.97 |
| CD57+CD4+TEMRA | −0.03 | 0.85 | −0.01 | 0.98 | 0.19 | 0.39 |
Spearman correlation coefficients (rs) and p values for CMV− and CMV+ persons and for the whole cohort are shown. p < 0.05 was considered significant. For all subpopulations, NCMV− = 20, NCMV+ = 19, Nall = 39. Detailed gating strategy used to define the populations are shown in Fig. 3
Statistically significant values are shown in bold
Fig. 3Gating strategy for the subsets of interest within CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Representative FACS plot with the gating strategy for CD28+/−, CD57+, TN, TCM, TEM, TEMRA within CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and the CD28+CD57−, CD28+CD57+, CD28−CD57− and CD28−CD57+ subsets within CD8+ T cells are shown
Correlations of CD8+ T cell subsets in in the human BM with BMI
| All | CMV | CMV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | rs | rs | ||||
| CD8+ T cells | −0.07 | 0.58 | −0.03 | 0.88 | −0.02 | 0.92 |
| CCR7+ CD45RA+ (CD8+TN) | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.34 | 0.10 |
| −0.03 | 0.78 | −0.03 | 0.88 | |||
| −0.24 | 0.27 | |||||
| CCR7−CD45RA+ (CD8+TEMRA) | 0.08 | 0.61 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.94 |
| −0.27 | 0.19 | |||||
| CD8+CD28− | −0.18 | 0.23 | −0.06 | 0.78 | −0.11 | 0.62 |
| −0.21 | 0.13 | −0.16 | 0.44 | |||
| −0.19 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.67 | |||
| 0.25 | 0.22 | |||||
| CD8+CD28−CD57+ | −0.18 | 0.17 | −0.05 | 0.76 | −0.27 | 0.17 |
Spearman correlation coefficients (rs) and p values for CMV− and CMV+ persons and for the whole cohort are shown. p < 0.05 was considered significant. For all subpopulations, NCMV− = 33, NCMV+ = 26, Nall = 59. Detailed gating strategy used to define the populations is shown in Fig. 3
Statistically significant values are shown in bold
Correlations between expression of PD-1, IL-7Rα and KLRG-1 within CD8+ T cell subsets in the human BM with BMI
| all | CMV | CMV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | rs | rs | ||||
| −0.15 | 0.27 | −0.01 | 0.96 | |||
| −0.17 | 0.24 | −0.03 | 0.88 | |||
| CD8+ SLEC | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.11 |
| 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.13 | |||
| 0.21 | 0.37 | |||||
| PD-1+ CD8+TCM | −0.10 | 0.43 | −0.15 | 0.42 | −0.06 | 0.78 |
| −0.10 | 0.62 | |||||
| KLRG1+CD8+TEM | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.09 | 0.69 | 0.16 | 0.48 |
| − 0.32 | 0.07 | − 0.13 | 0.52 | |||
| PD-1+CD8+TEMRA | −0.08 | 0.86 | −0.15 | 0.68 | −0.07 | 0.92 |
| 0.32 | 0.15 | |||||
| CD57+CD8+TEMRA | −0.29 | 0.45 | − 0.28 | 0.19 | ||
| −0.20 | 0.34 | |||||
| CD28+CD57+ PD-1+ | −0.15 | 0.25 | −0.24 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.66 |
| CD28−CD57− PD-1+ | −0.07 | 0.56 | −0.24 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.70 |
| CD28−CD57+ PD-1+ | −0.08 | 0.96 | −0.18 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.42 |
Spearman correlation coefficients (rs) and p values for CMV− and CMV+ persons and for the whole cohort are shown. p < 0.05 was considered significant. For all subpopulations, NCMV− = 33, NCMV+ = 26, Nall = 59. Detailed gating strategy used to define the populations and representative FACS plots are shown in Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 3
Statistically significant values are shown in bold
Fig. 4Summary of the significant correlations in paired BM/PB samples. Relationship between (a) CD8+ TEM (CMV+), (b) CD8+CD57+ (CMV−), (c) CD8+CD28+CD57+ (CMV−) and (d) CD8+CD28+CD57+ (CMV−) T cells in BMMCs and PBMCs and BMI. Spearman coefficient (rs), sample number (N), and p-values are reported in each graph